Evaluating Social Protection Policies With an Implementation Science Framework: India's Direct Benefit Transfer for Tuberculosis Comment on "Does Direct Benefit Transfer Improve Outcomes Among People With Tuberculosis? - A Mixed-Methods Study on the Need for a Review of the Cash Transfer Policy in India".

Ann M Schraufnagel, Priya B Shete
Author Information
  1. Ann M Schraufnagel: Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. ORCID
  2. Priya B Shete: Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA. ORCID

Abstract

Addressing the social and structural determinants of tuberculosis (TB) through social protection programs is a central feature of global public health policy and disease elimination strategies. However, how best to implement such programs remains unknown. India's direct benefit transfer (DBT) program is the largest cash transfer program in the world dedicated to supporting individuals affected by TB. Despite several studies aimed at evaluating the impact of DBT, many questions remain about its implementation, mechanisms of action, and effectiveness. Dave and Rupani's mixed-methods evaluation of this program previously published in this journal offers valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of the DBT program in improving TB treatment outcomes. Their results also provide an opportunity for demonstrating how systematically collected data may be further analyzed and presented using implementation science, a field of study using methods to promote the systematic uptake of evidence-based interventions to support sustainable program scale-up.

Keywords

References

  1. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 29;9(12):e033158 [PMID: 31888934]
  2. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 21;16:307 [PMID: 27329161]
  3. Implement Sci. 2015 Aug 07;10:109 [PMID: 26249843]
  4. Glob Health Action. 2019;12(1):1633725 [PMID: 31328678]
  5. J Family Med Prim Care. 2020 Aug 25;9(8):3955-3964 [PMID: 33110793]
  6. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2022 Dec 6;11(11):2552-2562 [PMID: 35174676]
  7. Bull World Health Organ. 2018 Jul 01;96(7):471-483 [PMID: 29962550]
  8. Indian J Tuberc. 2020 Apr;67(2):231-237 [PMID: 32553317]
  9. J Public Health Policy. 2019 Mar;40(1):126-141 [PMID: 30353132]
  10. Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50 [PMID: 19664226]

Grants

  1. T32 HL007185/NHLBI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Disease Eradication
Implementation Science
India
Public Policy
Tuberculosis

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0programTransferTBDBTsocialprogramsIndia'stransferimplementationusingSocialProtectionImplementationScienceDirectBenefitTuberculosisCashAddressingstructuraldeterminantstuberculosisprotectioncentralfeatureglobalpublichealthpolicydiseaseeliminationstrategiesHoweverbestimplementremainsunknowndirectbenefitlargestcashworlddedicatedsupportingindividualsaffectedDespiteseveralstudiesaimedevaluatingimpactmanyquestionsremainmechanismsactioneffectivenessDaveRupani'smixed-methodsevaluationpreviouslypublishedjournaloffersvaluableinsightsstrengthslimitationsimprovingtreatmentoutcomesresultsalsoprovideopportunitydemonstratingsystematicallycollecteddatamayanalyzedpresentedsciencefieldstudymethodspromotesystematicuptakeevidence-basedinterventionssupportsustainablescale-upEvaluatingPoliciesFramework:Comment"DoesImproveOutcomesAmongPeopleTuberculosis?-Mixed-MethodsStudyNeedReviewPolicyIndia"India

Similar Articles

Cited By