Use of camel urine is of no benefit to cancer patients: observational study and literature review.

Ali Al Zahrani, Ali Alfakeeh, Waleed Alghareeb, Hatoon Bakhribah, Bassam Basulaiman, Abdullah Alsuhail, Abdullah Alsharm
Author Information
  1. Ali Al Zahrani: Medical Oncology Department, Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  2. Ali Alfakeeh: Medical Oncology Department, Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  3. Waleed Alghareeb: Medical Oncology Department, Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  4. Hatoon Bakhribah: Medical Oncology Department, Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  5. Bassam Basulaiman: Medical Oncology Department, Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  6. Abdullah Alsuhail: Palliative Care Medicine Department, Comprehensive Cancer Center King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  7. Abdullah Alsharm: Medical Oncology Department, Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

Background: Complementary and alternative medicine is widely used in Saudi Arabia. One of the common practices is the use of camel urine alone or mixed with camel milk for the treatment of cancer, which is often supported by religious beliefs.
Aims: To observe and follow-up cancer patients who insisted on using camel urine, and to offer some clinically relevant recommendations.
Methods: We observed 20 cancer patients (15 male, 5 female) from September 2020 to January 2022 who insisted on using camel urine for treatment. We documented the demographics of each patient, the method of administering the urine, reasons for refusing conventional treatment, period of follow-up, and the outcome and side effects.
Results: All the patients had radiological investigations before and after their treatment with camel urine. All of them used a combination of camel urine and camel milk, and treatment ranged from a few days to 6 months. They consumed an average of 60 ml urine/milk per day. No clinical benefit was observed after the treatment; 2 patients developed brucellosis. Eleven patients changed their mind and accepted conventional antineoplastic treatment and 7 were too weak to receive further treatment; they died from the disease.
Conclusion: Camel urine had no clinical benefits for any of the cancer patients, it may even have caused zoonotic infection. The promotion of camel urine as a traditional medicine should be stopped because there is no scientific evidence to support it.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Female
Male
Humans
Animals
Camelus
Neoplasms
Medicine, Traditional
Brucellosis
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions
Observational Studies, Veterinary as Topic

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0camelurinetreatmentcancerpatientsmedicinemilkalternativeusedSaudiArabiareligiousfollow-upinsistedusingobservedconventionalclinicalbenefitBackground:ComplementarywidelyOnecommonpracticesusealonemixedoftensupportedbeliefsAims:observeofferclinicallyrelevantrecommendationsMethods:2015male5femaleSeptember2020January2022documenteddemographicspatientmethodadministeringreasonsrefusingperiodoutcomesideeffectsResults:radiologicalinvestigationscombinationrangeddays6monthsconsumedaverage60mlurine/milkperday2developedbrucellosisElevenchangedmindacceptedantineoplastic7weakreceivedieddiseaseConclusion:CamelbenefitsmayevencausedzoonoticinfectionpromotiontraditionalstoppedscientificevidencesupportitUsepatients:observationalstudyliteraturereviewcomplementarybelief

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)