Region-based evidential deep learning to quantify uncertainty and improve robustness of brain tumor segmentation.

Hao Li, Yang Nan, Javier Del Ser, Guang Yang
Author Information
  1. Hao Li: National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  2. Yang Nan: National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK.
  3. Javier Del Ser: TECNALIA, Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA), Derio, Spain.
  4. Guang Yang: National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK. ORCID

Abstract

Despite recent advances in the accuracy of brain tumor segmentation, the results still suffer from low reliability and robustness. Uncertainty estimation is an efficient solution to this problem, as it provides a measure of confidence in the segmentation results. The current uncertainty estimation methods based on quantile regression, Bayesian neural network, ensemble, and Monte Carlo dropout are limited by their high computational cost and inconsistency. In order to overcome these challenges, Evidential Deep Learning (EDL) was developed in recent work but primarily for natural image classification and showed inferior segmentation results. In this paper, we proposed a region-based EDL segmentation framework that can generate reliable uncertainty maps and accurate segmentation results, which is robust to noise and image corruption. We used the Theory of Evidence to interpret the output of a neural network as evidence values gathered from input features. Following Subjective Logic, evidence was parameterized as a Dirichlet distribution, and predicted probabilities were treated as subjective opinions. To evaluate the performance of our model on segmentation and uncertainty estimation, we conducted quantitative and qualitative experiments on the BraTS 2020 dataset. The results demonstrated the top performance of the proposed method in quantifying segmentation uncertainty and robustly segmenting tumors. Furthermore, our proposed new framework maintained the advantages of low computational cost and easy implementation and showed the potential for clinical application.

Keywords

References

  1. Neural Netw. 2021 Mar;135:105-114 [PMID: 33383525]
  2. Nat Methods. 2019 Jun;16(6):451-452 [PMID: 31147637]
  3. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2021 Feb;32(2):507-522 [PMID: 32603291]
  4. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2020 Nov;7(6):064006 [PMID: 33415178]
  5. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2017 Apr;39(4):640-651 [PMID: 27244717]
  6. Sci Data. 2017 Sep 05;4:170117 [PMID: 28872634]
  7. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Oct;34(10):1993-2024 [PMID: 25494501]
  8. Cognit Comput. 2024;16(4):2063-2077 [PMID: 38974012]
  9. Med Image Anal. 2020 Jan;59:101557 [PMID: 31677438]
  10. J Mach Learn Biomed Imaging. 2022 Aug;2022: [PMID: 36998700]
  11. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020 Dec;39(12):3868-3878 [PMID: 32746129]
  12. Front Neurosci. 2020 Apr 08;14:282 [PMID: 32322186]

Grants

  1. MC_PC_21013/Medical Research Council
  2. MR/V023799/1/Medical Research Council

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0segmentationresultsuncertaintytumorestimationproposedrecentbrainlowrobustnessUncertaintyneuralnetworkcomputationalcostEvidentialEDLimageshowedframeworkevidenceperformancedeeplearningDespiteadvancesaccuracystillsufferreliabilityefficientsolutionproblemprovidesmeasureconfidencecurrentmethodsbasedquantileregressionBayesianensembleMonteCarlodropoutlimitedhighinconsistencyorderovercomechallengesDeepLearningdevelopedworkprimarilynaturalclassificationinferiorpaperregion-basedcangeneratereliablemapsaccuraterobustnoisecorruptionusedTheoryEvidenceinterpretoutputvaluesgatheredinputfeaturesFollowingSubjectiveLogicparameterizedDirichletdistributionpredictedprobabilitiestreatedsubjectiveopinionsevaluatemodelconductedquantitativequalitativeexperimentsBraTS2020datasetdemonstratedtopmethodquantifyingrobustlysegmentingtumorsFurthermorenewmaintainedadvantageseasyimplementationpotentialclinicalapplicationRegion-basedevidentialquantifyimproveBrainRobustnessquantification

Similar Articles

Cited By