Preliminary Analysis of Gut Microbiome and Gastrointestinal Symptom Burden in Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy Compared to Healthy Controls.

Jemmie Hoang, Stephanie Gilbertson-White, Nicole Cady, Meeta Yadav, Shailesh Shahi, Leeann Aguilar, Ashutosh K Mangalam, Catherine Cherwin
Author Information
  1. Jemmie Hoang: College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  2. Stephanie Gilbertson-White: College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. ORCID
  3. Nicole Cady: Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  4. Meeta Yadav: Department of Pathology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  5. Shailesh Shahi: Department of Pathology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  6. Leeann Aguilar: Department of Pathology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  7. Ashutosh K Mangalam: Department of Pathology, Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  8. Catherine Cherwin: College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alterations in the naturally occurring bacteria of the gut, known as the gastrointestinal (GI) microbiome, may influence GI symptoms in women with breast cancer.
OBJECTIVE: This work aims to describe GI symptom occurrence, duration, severity, and distress and measures of the GI microbiome among women with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy compared to age- and sex-matched healthy controls.
INTERVENTIONS/METHODS: 22 women with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy and 17 healthy control women provided stool specimens and GI symptom data using the modified Memorial Symptom Assessment Scale (MSAS). The fecal microbiome was profiled by metagenomic sequencing of 16S Ribosomal RNA (rRNA). GI microbiome was compared between groups using alpha-diversity (Observed OTU number and Shannon index), beta-diversity (UniFrac distances), and relative abundance of select genera.
RESULTS: GI symptoms with high symptom reports among breast cancer patients included nausea, diarrhea, flatulence, dry mouth, taste change, and poor appetite. Indices of differential abundance (beta diversity) significantly distinguished between breast cancer patients and healthy controls. Unique bacterial features differentiating the 2 groups were , , , , , and .
CONCLUSIONS: Gut bacteria are associated with GI inflammation and mucus degradation, suggesting the potential role of the GI microbiome in GI symptom burden. Understanding the influence of GI bacteria on gut health and symptoms will help harness the enormous potential of the GI microbiome as a future diagnostic and therapeutic agent to reduce the symptom burden associated with chemotherapy.

Keywords

References

  1. Adv Cancer Res. 2022;155:131-166 [PMID: 35779873]
  2. Adv Immunol. 2014;121:91-119 [PMID: 24388214]
  3. Cancer Nurs. 2022 May-Jun 01;45(3):181-189 [PMID: 34183520]
  4. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2016;21:183-94 [PMID: 26776185]
  5. Am J Transplant. 2019 Feb;19(2):488-500 [PMID: 29920927]
  6. Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 15;10(1):21954 [PMID: 33319851]
  7. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;33(11):1844-1852 [PMID: 29744928]
  8. J Support Oncol. 2003 Jul-Aug;1(2):89-103 [PMID: 15352652]
  9. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jan;55(1):39-55 [PMID: 28838866]
  10. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2022 Jul 23;614:34-40 [PMID: 35567942]
  11. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Dec;73(23):7767-70 [PMID: 17933936]
  12. Food Res Int. 2021 Sep;147:110569 [PMID: 34399543]
  13. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2021 May 8;2021:9835654 [PMID: 34061119]
  14. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2017 Jan;61(1): [PMID: 27500859]
  15. PLoS One. 2022 Apr 26;17(4):e0264556 [PMID: 35472144]
  16. Neurochem Int. 2019 Oct;129:104468 [PMID: 31108132]
  17. Front Immunol. 2021 Mar 24;12:618150 [PMID: 33841399]
  18. Eur J Cancer. 1994;30A(9):1326-36 [PMID: 7999421]
  19. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2017 Jun;28:122-132 [PMID: 28478849]
  20. Biomedicines. 2021 Feb 13;9(2): [PMID: 33668580]
  21. Nutrients. 2021 Jun 28;13(7): [PMID: 34203292]
  22. Semin Oncol. 2006 Feb;33(1):106-20 [PMID: 16473649]
  23. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 May 14;25(18):2204-2216 [PMID: 31143071]
  24. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2022 Jul 29;8(1):89 [PMID: 35906259]
  25. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012 Mar;39(2):157-65 [PMID: 22374489]
  26. Eur J Breast Health. 2018 Jul 01;14(3):148-155 [PMID: 30123880]
  27. Gastroenterology. 2022 Sep;163(3):685-698 [PMID: 35643175]
  28. J Vis Exp. 2019 Oct 15;(152): [PMID: 31680682]
  29. Bioinformatics. 2022 Aug 10;38(16):4027-4029 [PMID: 35771644]
  30. Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 11;13(1):526 [PMID: 36631533]
  31. Animals (Basel). 2020 Jul 07;10(7): [PMID: 32645998]
  32. Pharmacol Res. 2019 Dec;150:104489 [PMID: 31689519]
  33. Eur J Pharmacol. 2022 Dec 5;936:175379 [PMID: 36356927]
  34. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2022 Dec 09;14:433-451 [PMID: 36532254]
  35. Nutrients. 2022 Jun 14;14(12): [PMID: 35745186]
  36. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Aug;106(2):217-26 [PMID: 18554960]
  37. Br J Nutr. 2013 Mar 14;109(5):894-7 [PMID: 22691288]
  38. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014 Sep;40(5):409-21 [PMID: 25040088]
  39. BMC Med. 2023 May 11;21(1):178 [PMID: 37170273]
  40. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Jul;35(7):1541-1555 [PMID: 37253948]
  41. Nat Protoc. 2020 Mar;15(3):799-821 [PMID: 31942082]
  42. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2012;:235-46 [PMID: 22174279]
  43. Gastroenterology. 2017 Jan;152(1):111-123.e8 [PMID: 27725146]
  44. PLoS Genet. 2021 May 4;17(5):e1009557 [PMID: 33945534]
  45. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Sep 2;2018:1394379 [PMID: 30246002]
  46. Cell Rep. 2017 Aug 8;20(6):1269-1277 [PMID: 28793252]
  47. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 Jul 3;45(W1):W180-W188 [PMID: 28449106]
  48. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2022 Feb;59(2):106502 [PMID: 34929293]

Grants

  1. P20 NR018081/NINR NIH HHS
  2. P30 ES005605/NIEHS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Gastrointestinal Microbiome
Breast Neoplasms
Symptom Burden
Gastrointestinal Tract
Feces
Bacteria

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0GImicrobiomebreastcancersymptomsymptomswomenbacteriachemotherapyhealthygutgastrointestinalinfluenceamongreceivingcomparedcontrolsusingSymptomgroupsabundancepatientsGutassociatedpotentialburdenBACKGROUND:AlterationsnaturallyoccurringknownmayOBJECTIVE:workaimsdescribeoccurrencedurationseveritydistressmeasuresage-sex-matchedINTERVENTIONS/METHODS:2217controlprovidedstoolspecimensdatamodifiedMemorialAssessmentScaleMSASfecalprofiledmetagenomicsequencing16SRibosomalRNArRNAalpha-diversityObservedOTUnumberShannonindexbeta-diversityUniFracdistancesrelativeselectgeneraRESULTS:highreportsincludednauseadiarrheaflatulencedrymouthtastechangepoorappetiteIndicesdifferentialbetadiversitysignificantlydistinguishedUniquebacterialfeaturesdifferentiating2CONCLUSIONS:inflammationmucusdegradationsuggestingroleUnderstandinghealthwillhelpharnessenormousfuturediagnostictherapeuticagentreducePreliminaryAnalysisMicrobiomeGastrointestinalBurdenBreastCancerPatientsReceivingChemotherapyComparedHealthyControlsantineoplasticagents

Similar Articles

Cited By