Patients' preferences for delivering bad news in palliative care in Ethiopia: a qualitative study.

Ephrem Abathun Ayalew, Ditaba David Mphuthi, Kholofelo Lorraine Matlhaba
Author Information
  1. Ephrem Abathun Ayalew: Department of Health Studies, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa. 10342435@mylife.unisa.ac.za. ORCID
  2. Ditaba David Mphuthi: Department of Health Studies, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa. ORCID
  3. Kholofelo Lorraine Matlhaba: Department of Health Studies, University of South Africa, Pretoria, South Africa. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: One of the major challenges for healthcare professionals relates to awareness of patients' preferences relative to how and when to break bad news and how much information should be disclosed in the eventuality of a serious medical diagnosis or prognosis. On occasions, a serious medical diagnosis or prognosis is withheld from the patient. There is a scarcity of evidence about cultural preferences regarding breaking bad news in the palliative care setting in Ethiopia. Therefore, it is necessary to understand the surrounding cultural issues to properly convey bad news. The purpose of the study was to explore Ethiopian patients' cultural preferences for receiving bad news in a palliative care setting.
METHODS: A qualitative research approach and nonprobability, purposive sampling method were applied. In-depth interviews were employed to collect data from eight patients who were diagnosed with cancer and cancer with HIV/AIDS during the time of data collection. Thematic analysis was applied to identify themes and subthemes. The data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using ATLAS.ti 22 computer software.
RESULTS: The following three themes emerged and are reported in this study: (1) Perceptions about life-threatening illness: religious values and rituals are essential for establishing perspectives on life-threatening illnesses and preferences in receiving bad news. (2) Experiences with life-threatening illness: study participants' experience with the method of breaking bad news was sad, and they were not provided with sufficient details about their medical condition. Making appropriate decisions, fulfilling the ordinance of religious faith, and avoiding unnecessary costs were outlined as benefits of receiving bad news. (3) Preferred ways of breaking bad news; the findings revealed that incremental, amiable and empathic methods for delivering bad news were preferred. It was suggested that the presence of family members is crucial when receiving bad news.
CONCLUSION: Patients choose to be told about their medical conditions in the presence of their family. However, the patient's needs for receiving bad news were unmet. Patients should be involved in the treatment decision process. Delivery of bad news needs to tailor the preferred methods, cultural values, and religious beliefs. Delivering bad news according to the patients' preferences helps to fulfil their wishes in palliative care.

Keywords

References

  1. JCO Glob Oncol. 2021 Aug;7:1341-1348 [PMID: 34491813]
  2. Emerg (Tehran). 2016 Winter;4(1):34-7 [PMID: 26862548]
  3. Pain Res Manag. 2017;2017:5698640 [PMID: 28694715]
  4. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Apr 06;18:100564 [PMID: 32309673]
  5. J Glob Oncol. 2016 Apr 20;2(5):268-274 [PMID: 28717713]
  6. PLoS One. 2020 Mar 13;15(3):e0230309 [PMID: 32168353]
  7. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2017 May;27(3):255-262 [PMID: 29217924]
  8. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 22;16(4):e0248738 [PMID: 33886561]
  9. Folia Med Cracov. 2017;57(3):101-112 [PMID: 29263459]
  10. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2018 Feb 26;14(1):18 [PMID: 29482630]
  11. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2017 Dec 19;10:13 [PMID: 30275940]
  12. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2020 Nov;30(6):1017-1026 [PMID: 33883848]
  13. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018 Mar;28(2):111-116 [PMID: 29983508]
  14. J Relig Health. 2020 Apr;59(2):946-960 [PMID: 30406493]
  15. PLoS One. 2019 May 1;14(5):e0215563 [PMID: 31042777]
  16. J Palliat Med. 2018 May;21(5):622-630 [PMID: 29425055]
  17. Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Jul 23;10:2173-2181 [PMID: 30087577]
  18. Int Nurs Rev. 2017 Dec;64(4):486-493 [PMID: 28151559]
  19. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul;149(7):3859-3870 [PMID: 35999331]
  20. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 4;18(1):520 [PMID: 29973219]
  21. J Transcult Nurs. 2019 Jul;30(4):340-349 [PMID: 30526378]
  22. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Sep 03;12:1659-1666 [PMID: 30214168]
  23. J Glob Oncol. 2019 Nov;5:1-8 [PMID: 31834831]
  24. Palliat Support Care. 2018 Oct;16(5):566-579 [PMID: 28829011]

MeSH Term

Humans
Palliative Care
Patient Preference
Ethiopia
Neoplasms
Qualitative Research
Truth Disclosure
Physician-Patient Relations

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0badnewspreferencescarereceivingmedicalculturalpalliativepatients'breakingstudydatalife-threateningreligiousseriousdiagnosisprognosissettingEthiopiaqualitativemethodappliedcancerthemesillness:valuesmethodsdeliveringpreferredpresencefamilyPatientsneedsBACKGROUND:OnemajorchallengeshealthcareprofessionalsrelatesawarenessrelativebreakmuchinformationdisclosedeventualityoccasionswithheldpatientscarcityevidenceregardingThereforenecessaryunderstandsurroundingissuesproperlyconveypurposeexploreEthiopianMETHODS:researchapproachnonprobabilitypurposivesamplingIn-depthinterviewsemployedcollecteightpatientsdiagnosedHIV/AIDStimecollectionThematicanalysisidentifysubthemestranscribedverbatimanalysedusingATLASti22computersoftwareRESULTS:followingthreeemergedreportedstudy:1Perceptionsritualsessentialestablishingperspectivesillnesses2Experiencesparticipants'experiencesadprovidedsufficientdetailsconditionMakingappropriatedecisionsfulfillingordinancefaithavoidingunnecessarycostsoutlinedbenefits3PreferredwaysfindingsrevealedincrementalamiableempathicsuggestedmemberscrucialCONCLUSION:choosetoldconditionsHoweverpatient'sunmetinvolvedtreatmentdecisionprocessDeliverytailorbeliefsDeliveringaccordinghelpsfulfilwishesPatients'Ethiopia:BreakingLife-threateningillnessPalliativePreferences

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.