Spatial analysis of future climate risk to stormwater infrastructure.

Jonathan B Butcher, Saumya Sarkar, Thomas E Johnson, Afshin Shabani
Author Information
  1. Jonathan B Butcher: Tetra Tech WTR, Tetra Tech, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA. ORCID
  2. Saumya Sarkar: Halff Associates, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  3. Thomas E Johnson: Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.
  4. Afshin Shabani: Tetra Tech WTR, Tetra Tech, Inc., Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.

Abstract

Climate change is expected to result in more intense precipitation events that will affect the performance and design requirements of stormwater infrastructure. Such changes will vary spatially, and climate models provide a range of estimates of the effects on events of different intensities and recurrence. Infrastructure performance should be evaluated against the expected range of events, not just rare extremes. We present a national-scale, spatially detailed screening assessment of the potential effects of climatic change on precipitation, stormwater runoff, and associated design requirements. This is accomplished through adjustment relative to multiple future climate scenarios of precipitation intensity-duration-frequency analyses presented in NOAA Atlas 14, which are commonly used in infrastructure design. Future precipitation results are estimated for each Atlas 14 station (these currently omit the Pacific Northwest). Results are interpolated using a geographically conditioned regression kriging approach to provide information about potential climate change impacts in a format more directly useful to local stormwater managers. The intensity of 24-h events with 2-year or greater recurrence is likely to increase in most areas of the United States leading to increased runoff and potential need for increased storage volumes. Changes in more frequent events (e.g., the 90th percentile event) commonly used in design of green infrastructure are relatively less.

Keywords

References

  1. Water Environ Res. 2020 Dec;92(12):2178-2192 [PMID: 31995847]
  2. Science. 2008 Feb 1;319(5863):573-4 [PMID: 18239110]
  3. J Water Clim Chang. 2022 Mar 22;13:1684-1705 [PMID: 36590233]
  4. J Environ Manage. 2020 Jun 15;264:110494 [PMID: 32250914]
  5. Sci Rep. 2014 Nov 18;4:7093 [PMID: 25403227]
  6. Clim Change. 2021 Jan 16;164(1-2):1-3 [PMID: 34334847]
  7. J Environ Manage. 2021 Jun 1;287:112300 [PMID: 33706090]

Grants

  1. EP-C-17-031/EPA
  2. EPA999999/Intramural EPA

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0precipitationeventsstormwaterclimatechangedesigninfrastructurepotentialrunoffexpectedwillperformancerequirementsspatiallyproviderangeeffectsrecurrencefutureAtlas14commonlyusedincreasedClimateresultintenseaffectchangesvarymodelsestimatesdifferentintensitiesInfrastructureevaluatedjustrareextremespresentnational-scaledetailedscreeningassessmentclimaticassociatedaccomplishedadjustmentrelativemultiplescenariosintensity-duration-frequencyanalysespresentedNOAAFutureresultsestimatedstationcurrentlyomitPacificNorthwestResultsinterpolatedusinggeographicallyconditionedregressionkrigingapproachinformationimpactsformatdirectlyusefullocalmanagersintensity24-h2-yeargreaterlikelyincreaseareasUnitedStatesleadingneedstoragevolumesChangesfrequenteg90thpercentileeventgreenrelativelylessSpatialanalysisriskextremestormcontrolmeasures

Similar Articles

Cited By