Chitosan combined with humic applications during sensitive growth stages to drought improves nutritional status and water relations of sweet potato.

Ayman M S Elshamly, Rashid Iqbal, Mohamed S Elshikh, Yasmeen A Alwasel, Talha Chaudhary
Author Information
  1. Ayman M S Elshamly: Water Studies and Research Complex, National Water Research Center, Cairo, Egypt. ayman_saleh@nwrc.gov.eg.
  2. Rashid Iqbal: Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture and Environment, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Bahawalpur, 63100, Pakistan.
  3. Mohamed S Elshikh: Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  4. Yasmeen A Alwasel: Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, 11451, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
  5. Talha Chaudhary: Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Godollo, 2100, Hungary. Chaudhary.Talha@stud.uni-mate.hu.

Abstract

The current decline in freshwater resources presents a significant global challenge to crop production, a situation expected to intensify with ongoing climate change. This underscores the need for extensive research to enhance crop yields under drought conditions, a priority for scientists given its vital role in global food security. Our study explores the effects of using humic and chitosan treatments to alleviate drought stress during critical growth phases and their impact on crop yield and water efficiency. We employed four different irrigation strategies: full irrigation, 70% irrigation at the early vine development stage, 70% irrigation during the storage root bulking stage, and 85% irrigation across both stages, complemented by full irrigation in other periods. The plants received either humic treatments through foliar spray or soil application, or chitosan foliar applications, with tap water serving as a control. Our findings highlight that the early vine development stage is particularly vulnerable to drought, with a 42.0% decrease in yield observed under such conditions. In normal growth scenarios, foliar application of humic substances significantly improved growth parameters, resulting in a substantial increase in yield and water efficiency by 66.9% and 68.4%, respectively, compared to the control treatment under full irrigation. For sweet potatoes irrigated with 70% water at the storage root bulking stage, ground application of humic substances outperformed both foliar applications of chitosan and humic in terms of yield results. The highest tuber yield and water efficiency were attained by combining chitosan and humic ground applications, regardless of whether 70% irrigation was used at the storage root bulking stage or 85% irrigation during both the early vine development and storage root bulking stages.

References

  1. Front Plant Sci. 2019 Dec 20;10:1619 [PMID: 31921262]
  2. Plants (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;12(9): [PMID: 37176838]
  3. Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 31;13(1):14260 [PMID: 37653028]
  4. Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 3;9(1):8164 [PMID: 31160657]
  5. Molecules. 2022 Apr 28;27(9): [PMID: 35566152]
  6. Front Plant Sci. 2020 Sep 02;11:1307 [PMID: 32983197]
  7. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2023 Aug;201:107828 [PMID: 37329687]
  8. Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 10;13(1):12956 [PMID: 37563236]
  9. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Jun;29(6):1943-1850 [PMID: 29974705]
  10. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 2001 Nov-Dec;65(6):1744-50 [PMID: 11885604]
  11. Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 19;9(1):12014 [PMID: 31427666]
  12. J Med Food. 2014 Jul;17(7):733-41 [PMID: 24921903]
  13. Int J Biol Macromol. 2021 Jul 1;182:1670-1680 [PMID: 34022316]
  14. Plants (Basel). 2022 Jul 08;11(14): [PMID: 35890438]
  15. Plants (Basel). 2021 Jan 28;10(2): [PMID: 33525688]
  16. Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 18;10(1):13971 [PMID: 32811903]
  17. J Exp Bot. 2000 Sep;51(350):1595-616 [PMID: 11006310]
  18. PLoS One. 2017 Dec 18;12(12):e0189715 [PMID: 29253886]
  19. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Jan 14;21(2): [PMID: 31947682]
  20. Front Plant Sci. 2014 Dec 04;5:687 [PMID: 25538721]
  21. Sci Rep. 2020 May 12;10(1):7854 [PMID: 32398697]
  22. Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Sep;30(9):3155-3163 [PMID: 31529891]
  23. Heliyon. 2019 Apr 28;5(4):e01547 [PMID: 31183422]
  24. BMC Plant Biol. 2022 Jul 22;22(1):364 [PMID: 35869431]
  25. J Plant Physiol. 2016 Mar 15;192:56-63 [PMID: 26851887]
  26. Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Feb 22;21(4): [PMID: 32098434]

MeSH Term

Humic Substances
Ipomoea batatas
Chitosan
Water
Droughts
Nutritional Status

Chemicals

Humic Substances
Chitosan
Water

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0irrigationhumicwateryieldstagedroughtchitosangrowth70%storagerootbulkingfoliarapplicationscropefficiencyfullearlyvinedevelopmentstagesapplicationglobalconditionstreatments85%controlsubstancessweetgroundcurrentdeclinefreshwaterresourcespresentssignificantchallengeproductionsituationexpectedintensifyongoingclimatechangeunderscoresneedextensiveresearchenhanceyieldspriorityscientistsgivenvitalrolefoodsecuritystudyexploreseffectsusingalleviatestresscriticalphasesimpactemployedfourdifferentstrategies:acrosscomplementedperiodsplantsreceivedeitherspraysoiltapservingfindingshighlightparticularlyvulnerable420%decreaseobservednormalscenariossignificantlyimprovedparametersresultingsubstantialincrease669%684%respectivelycomparedtreatmentpotatoesirrigatedoutperformedtermsresultshighesttuberattainedcombiningregardlesswhetherusedChitosancombinedsensitiveimprovesnutritionalstatusrelationspotato

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.