Letter: Does a Screening Trial for Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Pain of Neuropathic Origin Have Clinical Utility (TRIAL-STIM)? 36-Month Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Peng-Bo Zhou, Hong-Tao Sun
Author Information
  1. Peng-Bo Zhou: The First School of Clinical Medical, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, People's Republic of China. ORCID
  2. Hong-Tao Sun: The First School of Clinical Medical, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

No abstract text available.

References

  1. Eldabe S, Nevitt S, Griffiths S, et al. Does a screening trial for spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain of neuropathic origin have clinical utility (TRIAL-STIM)? 36-Month results from a randomized controlled trial. Neurosurgery. 2023;92(1):75-82.
  2. Eldabe S, Gulve A, Thomson S, et al. Does a screening trial for spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain of neuropathic origin have clinical utility and cost-effectiveness? (TRIAL-STIM Study): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial [published correction appears in Trials. 2019;20(1):610]. Trials. 2018;19(1):633.
  3. Eldabe S, Duarte RV, Gulve A, et al. Does a screening trial for spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic pain of neuropathic origin have clinical utility and cost-effectiveness (TRIAL-STIM)? A randomised controlled trial. Pain. 2020;161(12):2820-2829.

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0TrialLetter:ScreeningSpinalCordStimulationPatientsChronicPainNeuropathicOriginClinicalUtilityTRIAL-STIM?36-MonthResultsRandomizedControlled

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)