Student and caregiver acceptability of a school-based intervention to improve sugar-sweetened beverage behaviors: a mixed methods study.

Annie L Reid, Kathleen J Porter, Brittany M Kirkpatrick, Donna-Jean P Brock, Christopher J Altizer, Jamie M Zoellner
Author Information
  1. Annie L Reid: Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, 16 E. Main St., Christiansburg, VA 24073, USA.
  2. Kathleen J Porter: Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, 16 E. Main St., Christiansburg, VA 24073, USA.
  3. Brittany M Kirkpatrick: Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, 16 E. Main St., Christiansburg, VA 24073, USA.
  4. Donna-Jean P Brock: Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, 16 E. Main St., Christiansburg, VA 24073, USA.
  5. Christopher J Altizer: Tazewell County Public Schools, 506 Jeffersonville St., Tazewell, VA 24651, USA.
  6. Jamie M Zoellner: Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, 16 E. Main St., Christiansburg, VA 24073, USA.

Abstract

Kids SIPsmartER is a 6-month behavioral and health literacy intervention effective at reducing sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) intake among middle school students and their caregivers in the rural Appalachian region. This exploratory mixed methods study utilized a convergent parallel design to assess participant acceptability of a school-based curriculum for students and a text messaging program for caregivers. Acceptability was assessed using surveys (873 students and 453 caregivers), five focus groups (34 students) and telephone interviews (22 caregivers). Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, and qualitative data were content coded. On a 5-point scale, average quantitative survey acceptability ratings ranged from 2.7 to 3.3 among three student-rated questions and 4.1 to 4.2 among four caregiver-rated questions. Qualitative focus group findings suggested that students preferred curricular activities that were hands-on and involved social interaction, while caregiver interview results showed high acceptability of the text messaging program's design, including usability, content messages and personalization. Students and caregivers reported similar program benefits: increased knowledge of SSBs and health risks, increased awareness of SSB behaviors and support to make beverage behavior changes. Results from this study can be used to understand Kids SIPsmartER's effectiveness data, communicate the intervention's acceptability with stakeholders and plan for future implementation studies.

References

  1. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2008 Dec 1;65(23):2276-84 [PMID: 19020196]
  2. Health Promot Pract. 2019 Mar;20(2):258-268 [PMID: 29577771]
  3. Nutrients. 2023 Apr 19;15(8): [PMID: 37111178]
  4. Health Educ Res. 2015 Dec;30(6):811-39 [PMID: 26491072]
  5. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jul 30;7(7):e14785 [PMID: 31364600]
  6. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Mar;83(3):529-42 [PMID: 16522898]
  7. Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Aug;83:64-80 [PMID: 31233859]
  8. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2022 Mar;54(3):230-238 [PMID: 34953641]
  9. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2016 Aug;116(8):1295-1307.e6 [PMID: 27262383]
  10. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2018 Feb;50(2):173-179.e1 [PMID: 28818486]
  11. Health Commun. 2013;28(7):644-56 [PMID: 23980581]
  12. Health Educ Res. 2016 Aug;31(4):492-508 [PMID: 27173641]
  13. Obes Facts. 2020;13(4):397-417 [PMID: 32784303]
  14. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Mar 22;13:38 [PMID: 27000402]
  15. Health Educ Res. 2004 Jun;19(3):261-71 [PMID: 15140846]
  16. Lancet. 2022 Jan 8;399(10320):185-197 [PMID: 34856191]
  17. Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88 [PMID: 16204405]
  18. J Sch Health. 2021 Aug;91(8):608-616 [PMID: 34096052]
  19. Obes Rev. 2018 Nov;19(11):1504-1524 [PMID: 30019442]
  20. Am J Health Promot. 2018 Jul;32(6):1386-1401 [PMID: 28731385]
  21. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 May;117(5):683-697 [PMID: 28284525]
  22. Soc Sci Med. 2013 Nov;97:41-8 [PMID: 24161087]
  23. Ann Behav Med. 2013 Aug;46(1):81-95 [PMID: 23512568]
  24. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Jul;98(1):180-8 [PMID: 23676424]
  25. Public Health Nutr. 2017 Sep;20(13):2416-2431 [PMID: 28173882]
  26. Health Educ J. 2014 May;73(3):285-294 [PMID: 25242822]
  27. Eat Behav. 2018 Aug;30:42-48 [PMID: 29777969]
  28. Obes Rev. 2017 Nov;18(11):1350-1363 [PMID: 28721697]
  29. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Dec;115(12):1996-2002 [PMID: 26231057]
  30. Health Psychol. 2008 May;27(3):379-87 [PMID: 18624603]
  31. Int J Obes (Lond). 2019 Oct;43(10):1883-1890 [PMID: 31285521]
  32. Health Commun. 2007;22(1):37-48 [PMID: 17617012]
  33. Public Health Nutr. 2015 Aug;18(11):2055-66 [PMID: 25374257]
  34. Public Health Nutr. 2021 Aug;24(11):3242-3252 [PMID: 33427154]
  35. Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jan;58(1):142-151 [PMID: 31759805]
  36. Qual Health Res. 2019 Aug;29(10):1483-1496 [PMID: 30628545]
  37. Prev Sci. 2019 Aug;20(6):914-935 [PMID: 31152328]

Grants

  1. R01 MD012603/NIMHD NIH HHS
  2. R01MD012603/NIMHD NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Female
Sugar-Sweetened Beverages
Male
Caregivers
Focus Groups
Students
Adolescent
Text Messaging
Child
School Health Services
Appalachian Region
Adult
Health Promotion
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Middle Aged

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studentscaregiversacceptabilitybeverageamongstudydataKidshealthinterventionsugar-sweetenedSSBmixedmethodsdesignschool-basedtextmessagingprogramfocuscontent23questions4caregiverincreasedSIPsmartER6-monthbehavioralliteracyeffectivereducingintakemiddleschoolruralAppalachianregionexploratoryutilizedconvergentparallelassessparticipantcurriculumAcceptabilityassessedusingsurveys873453fivegroups34telephoneinterviews22Quantitativeanalyzeddescriptivelyqualitativecoded5-pointscaleaveragequantitativesurveyratingsranged7threestudent-rated1fourcaregiver-ratedQualitativegroupfindingssuggestedpreferredcurricularactivitieshands-oninvolvedsocialinteractioninterviewresultsshowedhighprogram'sincludingusabilitymessagespersonalizationStudentsreportedsimilarbenefits:knowledgeSSBsrisksawarenessbehaviorssupportmakebehaviorchangesResultscanusedunderstandSIPsmartER'seffectivenesscommunicateintervention'sstakeholdersplanfutureimplementationstudiesStudentimprovebehaviors:

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)