Optimizing photovoltaic thermal (PVT) collector selection: A multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach for renewable energy systems.

Sahand Hosouli, Nachiket Gaikwad, Shabahat Hasnain Qamar, Joao Gomes
Author Information
  1. Sahand Hosouli: Kingston University London, UK.
  2. Nachiket Gaikwad: MG Sustainable Engineering AB, Sweden.
  3. Shabahat Hasnain Qamar: MG Sustainable Engineering AB, Sweden.
  4. Joao Gomes: University of Gavle, Sweden.

Abstract

In the realm of renewable energy systems, the effective selection of Photovoltaic Thermal (PVT) collectors is important. This study delves into the intricacies of choosing optimal PVT collectors available in the market, emphasizing the utility of Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methodologies. PVT collectors are differentiated based on various aspects such as their transparent front cover presence and the medium-liquid or air-used for heat transfer. The study methodologically identifies commercially available PVT collectors and establishes key performance indicators for comparison. Using an 11-point fuzzy scale, a weight matrix is determined. Subsequently, advanced MCDM techniques, including PROMETHEE II, TOPSIS, EDAS, and VIKOR, are employed to rank the alternatives. This research not only provides a systematic approach to PVT collector selection but also extends to a MATLAB-based tool for facilitating the process. The results underscore the value of the proposed methodologies in refining the selection of PVT collectors and their potential adaptability to other applications, such as PVT collector design.

Keywords

References

  1. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2022;13(12):5491-5504 [PMID: 33868508]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0PVTselectioncollectorsMCDMcollectorrenewableenergysystemsstudyavailablemethodologiesbasedTOPSISVIKORapproachrealmeffectivePhotovoltaicThermalimportantdelvesintricacieschoosingoptimalmarketemphasizingutilityMultipleCriteriaDecisionMakingdifferentiatedvariousaspectstransparentfrontcoverpresencemedium-liquidair-usedheattransfermethodologicallyidentifiescommerciallyestablisheskeyperformanceindicatorscomparisonUsing11-pointfuzzyscaleweightmatrixdeterminedSubsequentlyadvancedtechniquesincludingPROMETHEEIIEDASemployedrankalternativesresearchprovidessystematicalsoextendsMATLAB-basedtoolfacilitatingprocessresultsunderscorevalueproposedrefiningpotentialadaptabilityapplicationsdesignOptimizingphotovoltaicthermalselection:multi-criteriadecision-makingTarget

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.