Comparison of Older Related versus Younger Unrelated Donors for Older Recipients of Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or Myelodysplastic Syndrome: A Large Single-Center Analysis.

Haesook T Kim, Vincent T Ho, Sarah Nikiforow, Corey Cutler, John Koreth, Roman M Shapiro, Mahasweta Gooptu, Rizwan Romee, Catherine J Wu, Joseph H Antin, Jerome Ritz, Robert J Soiffer
Author Information
  1. Haesook T Kim: Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: htkimc@jimmy.harvard.edu.
  2. Vincent T Ho: Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  3. Sarah Nikiforow: Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  4. Corey Cutler: Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  5. John Koreth: Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  6. Roman M Shapiro: Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  7. Mahasweta Gooptu: Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  8. Rizwan Romee: Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  9. Catherine J Wu: Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  10. Joseph H Antin: Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  11. Jerome Ritz: Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  12. Robert J Soiffer: Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Abstract

For patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), HLA-matched related donors (MRDs) have traditionally been the preferred donor source. However, as the age of recipients increases, their sibling donors are aging as well. In this study, we investigated whether younger matched unrelated donors (MUDs) might be a better donor source than similarly aged sibling donors for patients age >60 years with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). A total of 499 patients age 60 to 70 years with AML or MDS who underwent alloHCT from an older MRD (donor age ���50 years) or a younger MUD (donor age ���35 years) between 2010 and 2022 were evaluated. Of these, 360 patients (72%) received an MUD graft and 139 (28%) received an MRD graft. The median recipient age was 64 years in the MRD group and 66 years in the MUD group. With a median follow-up among survivors of 53 months (range, 9 to 147 months ), the 4-year progression-free survival was 40% in the MRD group and 41% in the MUD group (P = .79) and the 4-year overall survival was 50% and 44%, respectively (P = .15), with no between-group differences in nonrelapse mortality, relapse, and acute or chronic graft-versus-host disease. In the MUD group, we also compared the effect of donor age 18 to 24 years and donor age 25 to 35 years and found no differences in outcomes between the groups. We conclude that outcomes are comparable between the use of older MRDs and use of younger MUDs for elderly patients with AML or MDS, that there is no donor age effect among younger MUDs, and that the use of either donor type is reasonable.

Keywords

References

  1. Blood. 2022 Sep 22;140(12):1345-1377 [PMID: 35797463]
  2. Blood Adv. 2021 Dec 14;5(23):5140-5149 [PMID: 34581754]
  3. FEBS J. 2021 Dec;288(24):7123-7142 [PMID: 33590946]
  4. Blood. 2013 Mar 28;121(13):2567-73 [PMID: 23361908]
  5. Nat Rev Immunol. 2022 Aug;22(8):484-498 [PMID: 34815556]
  6. Blood. 2001 Oct 1;98(7):2043-51 [PMID: 11567988]
  7. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2017 Jan;23(1):165-171 [PMID: 27751935]
  8. J Intern Med. 2019 Apr;285(4):407-418 [PMID: 30372796]
  9. Blood. 2018 May 24;131(21):2393-2398 [PMID: 29632022]
  10. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2021 Dec 10;2021(1):264-274 [PMID: 34889391]
  11. N Engl J Med. 2010 Nov 25;363(22):2091-101 [PMID: 21105791]
  12. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2018 Apr;53(4):383-391 [PMID: 29269807]
  13. Semin Immunol. 2023 Nov;70:101834 [PMID: 37659169]
  14. Clin Transl Immunology. 2019 Nov 18;8(11):e01091 [PMID: 31832191]
  15. Transplant Cell Ther. 2023 Sep;29(9):578.e1-578.e9 [PMID: 37406882]
  16. Blood Adv. 2021 Mar 9;5(5):1360-1368 [PMID: 33661299]
  17. Front Genet. 2021 Jan 21;11:630186 [PMID: 33552142]
  18. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Jan;21(1):105-12 [PMID: 25278458]
  19. Blood. 2016 Jan 14;127(2):260-7 [PMID: 26527675]
  20. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2018 May;24(5):1049-1056 [PMID: 29454040]
  21. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2019 Oct 15;29(3):030501 [PMID: 31379458]
  22. Blood. 2020 Dec 24;136(26):2972-2973 [PMID: 33367550]
  23. Blood. 2010 Sep 16;116(11):1839-48 [PMID: 20538804]
  24. Blood. 2013 Sep 12;122(11):1974-82 [PMID: 23847196]
  25. Blood Adv. 2023 Aug 8;7(15):3903-3915 [PMID: 37156098]
  26. Blood Adv. 2023 Jun 13;7(11):2431-2435 [PMID: 36595453]
  27. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019 Apr;25(4):699-711 [PMID: 30423480]
  28. Leukemia. 2013 Mar;27(3):604-9 [PMID: 22821073]
  29. Blood. 2012 Apr 26;119(17):3908-16 [PMID: 22327226]
  30. Blood. 2020 Dec 24;136(26):3070-3081 [PMID: 33367544]

Grants

  1. P01 CA229092/NCI NIH HHS
  2. P01 HL158505/NHLBI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
Middle Aged
Female
Aged
Male
Unrelated Donors
Transplantation, Homologous
Age Factors
Adult
Graft vs Host Disease

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0donorageyearspatientsMUDgroupdonorsyoungerAMLMDSMRDmatchedMUDsuseOldertransplantationalloHCTrelatedMRDssourcesiblingunrelatedacuteolderreceivedgraftmedianamongmonths4-yearsurvivalP=differenceseffectoutcomesYoungerAllogeneicundergoingallogeneichematopoieticcellHLA-matchedtraditionallypreferredHoweverrecipientsincreasesagingwellstudyinvestigatedwhethermightbettersimilarlyaged>60myeloidleukemiamyelodysplasticsyndrometotal4996070underwent���50���3520102022evaluated36072%13928%recipient6466follow-upsurvivors53range9147progression-free40%41%79overall50%44%respectively15between-groupnonrelapsemortalityrelapsechronicgraft-versus-hostdiseasealsocompared18242535foundgroupsconcludecomparableelderlyeithertypereasonableComparisonRelatedversusUnrelatedDonorsRecipientsHematopoieticCellTransplantationAcuteMyeloidLeukemiaMyelodysplasticSyndrome:LargeSingle-CenterAnalysisDonor

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)