Tobacco Quitline utilization compared with cigarette smoking prevalence in Virginia across rurality and Appalachian Status, 2011-2019.

Asal Pilehvari, Rebecca Anne Krukowski, Kara Philips Wiseman, Melissa Ashley Little
Author Information
  1. Asal Pilehvari: Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  2. Rebecca Anne Krukowski: Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  3. Kara Philips Wiseman: Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  4. Melissa Ashley Little: Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Abstract

Introduction: While cigarette smoking rates have declined, rural and Appalachian populations in the United States have not seen similar decreases. quitline programs are promising strategies in reducing disparities in these areas, but research on their usage is limited.
Methods: We employed Small Area Estimation on the Virginia Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (2011-2019) to estimate county-level smoking prevalence and utilized The Quit Now Virginia quitline data (2011-2019) to estimate quitline users. We analyzed differences in quitline utilization by rurality and Appalachian status using statistical t-tests. Stepwise regression assessed the absolute estimate of county features, including poverty rate, tobacco retailer density, physician availability, coal mining industry, and tobacco agriculture, on quitline usage.
Results: While the average smoking rate overall was 15.3 %, only 7.4 % of smokers accessed quitline services from 2011 to 2019. Appalachian regions exhibited higher smoking rates (20.9 %) and lower quitline usage (4.8 %) compared to non-Appalachian areas (14 % smoking prevalence, 8 % quitline usage). Rural regions had higher smoking prevalence (19.0 %) than urban areas (12.9 %), but no significant difference in quitline utilization (7.6 % vs. 7.2 %, p = 0.7). Stepwise regression revealed counties with more tobacco agriculture had 3.2 % (p = 0.04) lower quitline utilization. Also, more physicians availability in the county was associated with 3.9 % higher quitline usage (p = 0.03) and Appalachian counties exhibited a 3.6 % lower quitline usage rate compared to non-Appalachian counties.
Conclusion: A significant gap exists between cigarette smoking prevalence and quitline utilization, particularly in underserved rural and Appalachian areas, despite no clear barriers to accessing this remote cessation resource.
Implication: The study underscores persistent disparities in smoking rates, with rural and Appalachian regions in the United States facing higher smoking prevalence and limited utilization of quitline services. Despite no clear barriers to access, the gap between smoking prevalence and quitline usage remains significant, particularly in underserved areas. Tailoring interventions to address regional disparities and factors like tobacco agriculture and physician availability is essential to reduce smoking rates and improve quitline utilization in these communities.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0207818 [PMID: 30485376]
  2. Tob Control. 2007 Dec;16 Suppl 1:i81-6 [PMID: 18048638]
  3. Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Apr 15;179(8):1025-33 [PMID: 24598867]
  4. Contemp Clin Trials. 2023 Nov;134:107335 [PMID: 37730197]
  5. Am J Prev Med. 2020 Feb;58(2):261-269 [PMID: 31740013]
  6. Am J Public Health. 2023 Jul;113(7):811-814 [PMID: 37141556]
  7. BMC Public Health. 2021 Feb 2;21(1):270 [PMID: 33530976]
  8. Am J Ind Med. 2015 Sep;58(9):996-1007 [PMID: 26179203]
  9. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023 May 05;72(18):475-483 [PMID: 37141154]

Grants

  1. P30 CA044579/NCI NIH HHS
  2. R01 CA267963/NCI NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0QuitlinesmokingprevalenceAppalachianusageutilizationareasratestobacco7highercigaretteruraldisparitiesVirginia2011-2019estimateStepwiserateavailabilityagricultureregions9 %lowercomparedsignificantp = 0counties3UnitedStatesprogramslimitedSmallArearuralityregressioncountyphysicianservicesexhibitedquitline8 %non-Appalachian6 %2 %gapparticularlyunderservedclearbarrierscessationCigaretteIntroduction:declinedpopulationsseensimilardecreasespromisingstrategiesreducingresearchMethods:employedEstimationBehavioralRiskFactorSurveillanceSystemcounty-levelutilizedQuitNowdatausersanalyzeddifferencesstatususingstatisticalt-testsassessedabsolutefeaturesincludingpovertyretailerdensitycoalminingindustryResults:averageoverall153 %4 %smokersaccessed2011201920414 %Rural190 %urban12differencevsrevealed04Alsophysiciansassociated03Conclusion:existsdespiteaccessingremoteresourceImplication:studyunderscorespersistentfacingDespiteaccessremainsTailoringinterventionsaddressregionalfactorslikeessentialreduceimprovecommunitiesTobaccoacrossStatusDatavisualizationDisparitiesRuralityestimationsanalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.