Measuring the Complexity of Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Challenges for Adolescents in Canada.

Meng Qi Wu, Violet V Cieslik, Safoura Askari, Allyson F Hadwin, Moira Hood
Author Information
  1. Meng Qi Wu: Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada. ORCID
  2. Violet V Cieslik: Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
  3. Safoura Askari: Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
  4. Allyson F Hadwin: Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
  5. Moira Hood: Department of Educational Psychology and Leadership Studies, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.

Abstract

Research that uses self-report measures to examine the complexity of self-regulated learning (SRL) and academic challenges for adolescents is limited. This study examined the psychometric property of the Self-Regulated Learning Profile and Self-Diagnostic (SRL-PSD) instrument and addressed the multi-components of SRL and academic challenges for adolescents. Participants were 358 adolescents from a Canadian middle school. The subscales of SRL-PSD were administered to students through LimeSurvey during a 25-min instructional session over two days. Results demonstrated the SRL-PSD was a reliable and valid self-report instrument to measure adolescents' SRL practices and academic challenges. Also, all types of SRL practices and academic challenges were significantly intercorrelated. Additionally, all types of SRL practices were positively associated with school engagement, whereas all types of academic challenges were negatively associated with school engagement. Overall, this study provides a validated self-report measure for educators and researchers to examine adolescents' SRL practices and academic challenges.

Keywords

References

  1. Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135 [PMID: 20550733]
  2. J Youth Adolesc. 2018 Jan;47(1):194-206 [PMID: 28555291]
  3. Multivariate Behav Res. 1990 Apr 1;25(2):173-80 [PMID: 26794479]
  4. Emotion. 2014 Apr;14(2):227-34 [PMID: 24512251]
  5. Child Dev. 2007 Jan-Feb;78(1):246-63 [PMID: 17328703]
  6. Horm Behav. 2013 Jul;64(2):323-32 [PMID: 23998675]
  7. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):69-74 [PMID: 15668099]
  8. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2005 Mar;34(1):49-61 [PMID: 15677280]
  9. Psychol Bull. 1990 Mar;107(2):238-46 [PMID: 2320703]
  10. Annu Rev Psychol. 2010;61:653-78 [PMID: 19575616]
  11. Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 16;13:813529 [PMID: 35369150]
  12. Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 14;13:813632 [PMID: 35774935]
  13. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:83-110 [PMID: 11148300]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0academicchallengesSRLpracticesself-reportadolescentsSRL-PSDschooltypesengagementexamineself-regulatedlearningstudySelf-RegulatedLearninginstrumentmeasureadolescents'associatedResearchusesmeasurescomplexitylimitedexaminedpsychometricpropertyProfileSelf-Diagnosticaddressedmulti-componentsParticipants358CanadianmiddlesubscalesadministeredstudentsLimeSurvey25-mininstructionalsessiontwodaysResultsdemonstratedreliablevalidAlsosignificantlyintercorrelatedAdditionallypositivelywhereasnegativelyOverallprovidesvalidatededucatorsresearchersMeasuringComplexityAcademicChallengesAdolescentsCanadaeducationprogramleadershipmeasurementsecondaryeducation/adolescencesocialeducationalenvironmentstudent

Similar Articles

Cited By