Analyzing the Psychometric Properties of Infant (0-24 Months) Developmental Assessments: A Scoping Review.

Sambidha Ghimire, Eva Ang, Morgan Deibert, Emily Hartvich, Sandra Fucile
Author Information
  1. Sambidha Ghimire: School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  2. Eva Ang: School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  3. Morgan Deibert: School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  4. Emily Hartvich: School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
  5. Sandra Fucile: School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the psychometric properties of available developmental assessments for infants, aged 0-24���months.
METHODS: A scoping review was conducted using the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews as a guideline. The following four databases: Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science were used to retrieve articles. Assessments were analyzed for psychometric properties of reliability and validity. : Fifteen developmental assessments were identified and evaluated based on their psychometric properties from 20 number of articles.
RESULTS: Three assessments including Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development 3rd Edition (BSID-III), Caregiver Reported Early Development Instruments (CREDI), and Ages and Stages Questionnaire 3rd Edition (ASQ-3), were identified to have the most supporting evidence.
CONCLUSION: This study provided clinicians with an updated list of all-encompassing infant developmental assessments. Certain assessments require additional evidence regarding their psychometric properties to substantiate their clinical utility.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Humans
Infant
Psychometrics
Child Development
Infant, Newborn
Reproducibility of Results
Child, Preschool
Developmental Disabilities

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0assessmentspsychometricpropertiesdevelopmentalInfantScopingarticlesreliabilityvalidityidentifiedDevelopment3rdEditionevidencePURPOSE:assessavailableinfantsaged0-24���monthsMETHODS:scopingreviewconductedusingPRISMAExtensionReviewsguidelinefollowingfourdatabases:MedlineCINAHLEmbaseWebScienceusedretrieveAssessmentsanalyzed:Fifteenevaluatedbased20numberRESULTS:ThreeincludingBayleyScalesToddlerBSID-IIICaregiverReportedEarlyInstrumentsCREDIAgesStagesQuestionnaireASQ-3supportingCONCLUSION:studyprovidedcliniciansupdatedlistall-encompassinginfantCertainrequireadditionalregardingsubstantiateclinicalutilityAnalyzingPsychometricProperties0-24MonthsDevelopmentalAssessments:Reviewassessmentneurodevelopment

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.