E-learning Interventions for Quality Improvement Continuing Medical Education-A Scoping Review.

Michael J Roth, Lauren A Maggio, Joseph A Costello, Anita Samuel
Author Information
  1. Michael J Roth: Dr. Roth: Assistant Professor of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD. Dr. Maggio: Professor of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD. Mr. Costello: Research Associate, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD. Dr. Samuel: Associate Professor of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Improving health care quality and patient safety are top priorities for the medical field. Robust continuing medical education (CME) programs represent major interventions to effectively teach quality improvement (QI) principles to practicing physicians. In particular, eLearning, a term describing online and distance learning interventions using digital tools, provides a means for CME interventions to reach broader audiences. Although there has been a focus on CME addressing QI, no knowledge synthesis has focused specifically on eLearning interventions. The purpose of this review was to examine the current landscape of eLearning interventions in QI-focused CME.
METHODS: We conducted a scoping review using the framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley as revised by Levac. We searched five databases and identified 2467 prospective publications, which two authors independently screened for inclusion. From each included article, two authors independently extracted data on the instructional modalities and QI tools used and met regularly to achieve consensus.
RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were included. Most studies used blended instruction ( n = 12) rather than solely eLearning interventions. Salient findings included the importance of coaching from QI experts and institutional support for planning and implementing eLearning interventions. Lack of protected time and resources for participants were identified as barriers to participation in CME activities, with small practices being disproportionately affected.
DISCUSSION: Partnerships between CME developers and sponsoring organizations are vital in creating sustainable eLearning interventions for QI-focused CME. Remote coaching can be an effective strategy to provide ongoing support to geographically separated learners.

References

  1. Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.
  2. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.
  3. Elliott RA, Camacho E, Jankovic D, et al. Economic analysis of the prevalence and clinical and economic burden of medication error in England. BMJ Qual Saf. 2021;30:96–105.
  4. Bates DW, Singh H. Two decades since To Err is Human: an assessment of progress and emerging priorities in patient safety. Health Aff. 2018;37:1736–1743.
  5. Dzau VJ, Shine KI. Two decades since To Err is Human: progress, but still a “chasm.” JAMA. 2020;324:2489–2490.
  6. Levinson W, Wong B. Aligning continuing professional development with quality improvement. CMAJ. 2021;193:E647–E648.
  7. Shojania KG, Silver I, Levinson W. Continuing medical education and quality improvement: a match made in heaven? Ann Intern Med. 2012;156:305–308.
  8. Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education. The ACCME Accreditation Requirements; 2021. Available at: https://www.accme.org/sites/default/files/2021-12/626_20211221_Accreditation_Requirements.pdf . Accessed July 20, 2022.
  9. Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME). ACCME 2013 Annual Report; 2013. Available at: https://www.accme.org/sites/default/files/2019-07/630_20140715_2013_Annual_Report.pdf . Accessed August 23, 2023.
  10. Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME). ACCME Data Report: Renewal and Growth in Accredited Continuing Education—2022; 2023. Available at: https://www.accme.org/sites/default/files/2023-07/2022%20ACCME%20Annual%20Data%20Report%201003_20230713.pdf . Accessed August 23, 2023.
  11. Dost S, Hossain A, Shehab M, et al. Perceptions of medical students towards online teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national cross-sectional survey of 2721 UK medical students. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e042378.
  12. Mortagy M, Abdelhameed A, Sexton P, et al. Online medical education in Egypt during the COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide assessment of medical students' usage and perceptions. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22:218.
  13. Alsoufi A, Alsuyihili A, Msherghi A, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical education: medical students' knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding electronic learning. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0242905.
  14. McLean R. Continuing professional development for rural physicians: an oxymoron or just non-existent? Intern Med J. 2006;36:661–664.
  15. Curran V, Rourke L, Snow P. A framework for enhancing continuing medical education for rural physicians: a summary of the literature. Med Teach. 2010;32:e501–e508.
  16. Berndt A, Murray CM, Kennedy K, et al. Effectiveness of distance learning strategies for continuing professional development (CPD) for rural allied health practitioners: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ. 2017;17:117.
  17. Maloney S, Haas R, Keating JL, et al. Breakeven, cost benefit, cost effectiveness, and willingness to pay for web-based versus face-to-face education delivery for health professionals. J Med Internet Res. 2012;14:e47.
  18. O'Doherty D, Dromey M, Lougheed J, et al. Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education—an integrative review. BMC Med Educ. 2018;18:130.
  19. Khurshid Z, De Brún A, Martin J, et al. A systematic review and narrative synthesis: determinants of the effectiveness and sustainability of measurement-focused quality improvement trainings. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2021;41:210–220.
  20. Cervero RM, Gaines JK. The impact of CME on physician performance and patient health outcomes: an updated synthesis of systematic reviews. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2015;35:131–138.
  21. Samuel A, Cervero RM, Durning SJ, et al. Effect of continuing professional development on health professionals' performance and patient outcomes: a scoping review of knowledge syntheses. Acad Med. 2021;96:913–923.
  22. Cook DA. Web-based learning: pros, cons and controversies. Clin Med (Lond). 2007;7:37–42.
  23. Rouleau G, Gagnon MP, Côté J, et al. Effects of E-learning in a continuing education context on nursing care: systematic review of systematic qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-studies reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2019;21:e15118.
  24. Sinclair PM, Kable A, Levett-Jones T, et al. The effectiveness of Internet-based e-learning on clinician behaviour and patient outcomes: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2016;57:70–81.
  25. Williams E, Fernandes RD, Choi K, et al. Learning outcomes and educational effectiveness of E-learning as a continuing professional development intervention for practicing surgeons and proceduralists: a systematic review. J Surg Educ. 2023;80:1139–1149.
  26. K Zhang K, Thompson AW. Effectiveness of electronic learning for continuing interprofessional education on behavior change of healthcare professionals: a scoping review. J Interprof Care. 2023;37:807–817.
  27. Cook DA, Garside S, Levinson AJ, et al. What do we mean by web-based learning? A systematic review of the variability of interventions. Med Educ. 2010;44:765–774.
  28. Regmi K, Jones L. A systematic review of the factors—enablers and barriers—affecting e-learning in health sciences education. BMC Med Educ. 2020;20:91.
  29. Boonyasai RT, Windish DM, Chakraborti C, et al. Effectiveness of teaching quality improvement to clinicians: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298:1023–1037.
  30. Starr SR, Kautz JM, Sorita A, et al. Quality improvement education for health professionals: a systematic review. Am J Med Qual. 2016;31:209–216.
  31. Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.
  32. Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:69.
  33. Thomas A, Lubarsky S, Durning SJ, et al. Knowledge syntheses in medical education: demystifying scoping reviews. Acad Med. 2017;92:161–166.
  34. Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMAScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169:467–473.
  35. Covidence Systematic Review Software. Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia. 2022. Available at: www.covidence.org .
  36. Holmboe ES, Meehan TP, Lynn L, et al. Promoting physicians' self-assessment and quality improvement: the ABIM diabetes practice improvement module. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:109–119.
  37. Duffy FD, Lynn LA, Didura H, et al. Self-assessment of practice performance: development of the ABIM Practice Improvement Module (PIM). J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008;28:38–46.
  38. Lazorick S, Crowe VL, Dolins JC, et al. Structured intervention utilizing state professional societies to foster quality improvement in practice. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2008;28:131–139.
  39. Benn J, Burnett S, Parand A, et al. Perceptions of the impact of a large-scale collaborative improvement programme: experience in the UK Safer Patients Initiative. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15:524–540.
  40. Slater BL, Lawton R, Armitage G, et al. Training and action for patient safety: embedding interprofessional education for patient safety within an improvement methodology. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2012;32:80–89.
  41. Rodrigue C, Seoane L, Gala RB, et al. Implementation of a faculty development curriculum emphasizing quality improvement and patient safety: results of a qualitative study. Ochsner J. 2013;13:319–321.
  42. Bundy DG, Morawski LF, Lazorick S, et al. Education in Quality Improvement for Pediatric Practice: an online program to teach clinicians QI. Acad Pediatr. 2014;14:517–525.
  43. John T, Morton M, Weissman M, et al. Feasibility of a virtual learning collaborative to implement an obesity QI project in 29 pediatric practices. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014;26:205–213.
  44. Butler A, Canamucio A, Macpherson D, et al. Primary care staff perspectives on a virtual learning collaborative to support medical home implementation. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(suppl 2):S579–S588.
  45. Peterson LE, Blackburn BE, Puffer JC, et al. Family physicians' quality interventions and performance improvement through the ABFM diabetes performance in practice module. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12:17–20.
  46. Peterson LE, Eden A, Cochrane A, et al. Physician satisfaction with and practice changes resulting from American board of family medicine maintenance of certification performance in practice modules. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2016;36:55–60.
  47. Wiggins RE Jr, Etz R. Assessment of the American Board of Ophthalmology's Maintenance of Certification Part 4 (Improvement in Medical Practice). JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134:967–974.
  48. Bhalla R, Jalon HS, Ryan L. The clinical quality fellowship program: developing clinical quality leadership in the greater New York region. Am J Med Qual. 2018;33:119–126.
  49. Gregory ME, Bryan JL, Hysong SJ, et al. Evaluation of a distance learning curriculum for interprofessional quality improvement leaders. Am J Med Qual. 2018;33:590–597.
  50. Baernholdt M, Feldman M, Davis-Ajami ML, et al. An interprofessional quality improvement training program that improves educational and quality outcomes. Am J Med Qual. 2019;34:577–584.
  51. O'Leary KJ, Fant AL, Thurk J, et al. Immediate and long-term effects of a team-based quality improvement training programme. BMJ Qual Saf. 2019;28:366–373.
  52. Ray MK, Gelmon SB, DiVeronica M, et al. Faculty development in improvement science: building capacity and expanding curricula across an academic health center. J Grad Med Educ. 2019;11:678–684.
  53. Scott E, Downs S, Pottenger A, et al. Quality improvement learning collaborative improves timely newborn follow-up appointments. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2019;45:808–813.
  54. Rinke ML, Bundy DG, Stein REK, et al. Increasing recognition and diagnosis of adolescent depression: project RedDE: a cluster randomized trial. Pediatr Qual Saf. 2019;4:e217.
  55. Nowicki M, Berg BW, Okada Y, et al. A patient safety champion program for interprofessional health care educators: implementation and outcomes. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2022;42:211–218.
  56. Thienprayoon R, Jones E, Humphrey L, et al. The pediatric palliative improvement network: a national healthcare learning collaborative. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2022;63:131–139.
  57. Tarpada SP, Hsueh WD, Gibber MJ. Resident and student education in otolaryngology: a 10-year update on e-learning. Laryngoscope. 2017;127:E219–E224.
  58. Curran VR, Fleet LJ, Kirby F. A comparative evaluation of the effect of Internet-based CME delivery format on satisfaction, knowledge and confidence. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10:10.
  59. Shaikh U, Yin HS, Mistry KB, et al. Leveraging medical conferences and webinars for hands-on clinical quality improvement: an intervention to improve health literacy-informed communication in pediatrics. Am J Med Qual. 2018;33:213–215.
  60. Vai M, Sosulski K. Essentials of Online Course Design: A Standards-Based Guide. Routledge; 2015.
  61. Reed JE, Card AJ. The problem with Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25:147–152.
  62. Taylor MJ, McNicholas C, Nicolay C, et al. Systematic review of the application of the plan-do-study-act method to improve quality in healthcare. BMJ Qual Saf. 2014;23:290–298.
  63. Wasfy NF, Abouzeid E, Nasser AA, et al. A guide for evaluation of online learning in medical education: a qualitative reflective analysis. BMC Med Educ. 2021;21:339.
  64. Yee M, Simpson-Young V, Paton R, et al. How do GPs want to learn in the digital era? Aust Fam Physician. 2014;43:399–402.
  65. Sargeant J, Mann K, Sinclair D, et al. Learning in practice: experiences and perceptions of high-scoring physicians. Acad Med. 2006;81:655–660.
  66. Zamboni K, Baker U, Tyagi M, et al. How and under what circumstances do quality improvement collaboratives lead to better outcomes? A systematic review. Implement Sci. 2020;15:27.
  67. Knight AW, Tam CWM, Dennis S, et al. The role of quality improvement collaboratives in general practice: a qualitative systematic review. BMJ Open Qual. 2022;11:e001800.
  68. Maggio LA, Bynum WE IV, Schreiber-Gregory DN, et al. When will I get my paper back? A replication study of publication timelines for health professions education research. Perspect Med Educ. 2020;9:139–146.
  69. Hrastinski S. Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Q. 2008;31:51–55.
  70. Rayburn WF, Davis DA, Turco M, eds. Continuing Professional Development in Medicine and Health Care: Better Education, Better Patient Outcomes. Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer; 2018.
  71. Graham CR. Emerging practice and research in blended learning. In: Moore MG, ed. Handbook of Distance Education. 3rd ed. England, United Kingdom: Routledge; 2013:333–350.
  72. Myers JS, Jaeger J. Faculty development in quality improvement: crossing the educational chasm. Am J Med Qual. 2012;27:96–97.
  73. Santiesteban L, Young E, Tiarks GC, et al. Defining advising, coaching, and mentoring for student development in medical education. Cureus. 2022;14:e27356.
  74. Northern Illinois University Center for Innovative Teaching and Learning. Experiential Learning. 2012. Available at: https://www.niu.edu/citl/resources/guides/instructional-guide/experiential-learning.shtml . Accessed November 2, 2023.
  75. Johnson SM. Online Course Module Structure. Vanderbilt University Course Development Resources. 2020. Available at: https://www.vanderbilt.edu/cdr/module1/online-course-module-structure/ . Accessed August 6, 2023.
  76. Surgical Collaborative of Wisconsin. What Is a Quality Improvement Collaborative? Available at: https://www.scwisconsin.org/about/what-is-a-quality-collaborative/ . Accessed August 6, 2023.
  77. Barron B. What Is a Webinar (Definition)? +How Does it Work? Envato. 2020. Available at: https://tinyurl.com/54nxmv9m . Accessed August 6, 2023.
  78. “Webinar.”. Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Merriam-Webster. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/webinar . Accessed August 16, 2023.

MeSH Term

Humans
Quality Improvement
Education, Medical, Continuing
Education, Distance

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0interventionsCMEeLearningQIincludedqualitymedicalusingtoolsreviewQI-focusedidentifiedtwoauthorsindependentlyusedstudiescoachingsupportINTRODUCTION:ImprovinghealthcarepatientsafetytopprioritiesfieldRobustcontinuingeducationprogramsrepresentmajoreffectivelyteachimprovementprinciplespracticingphysiciansparticulartermdescribingonlinedistancelearningdigitalprovidesmeansreachbroaderaudiencesAlthoughfocusaddressingknowledgesynthesisfocusedspecificallypurposeexaminecurrentlandscapeMETHODS:conductedscopingframeworkdevelopedArkseyO'MalleyrevisedLevacsearchedfivedatabases2467prospectivepublicationsscreenedinclusionarticleextracteddatainstructionalmodalitiesmetregularlyachieveconsensusRESULTS:Twenty-oneblendedinstructionn=12rathersolelySalientfindingsimportanceexpertsinstitutionalplanningimplementingLackprotectedtimeresourcesparticipantsbarriersparticipationactivitiessmallpracticesdisproportionatelyaffectedDISCUSSION:PartnershipsdeveloperssponsoringorganizationsvitalcreatingsustainableRemotecaneffectivestrategyprovideongoinggeographicallyseparatedlearnersE-learningInterventionsQualityImprovementContinuingMedicalEducation-AScopingReview

Similar Articles

Cited By