Editorial Comment on Anatomical outcomes and complications of sacrocolpopexy using surelift uplift mesh: A multicentric observational study.

Elisabetta Costantini, Ester Illiano
Author Information
  1. Elisabetta Costantini: Andrological and Urogynaecological Clinic, Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Perugia, Santa Maria Terni Hospital, Perugia, Italy. ORCID
  2. Ester Illiano: Andrological and Urogynaecological Clinic, Department of Medicine and Surgery University of Perugia, Santa Maria Terni Hospital, Perugia, Italy.

Abstract

No abstract text available.

References

  1. Maher C, Feiner B, Baessler K, Schmid C. Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;CD004014.
  2. Hermosa PC, Guerrero CS. Anatomical outcomes and complications of sacrocolpopexy using Surelift Uplift mesh: a multicentric observational study. Int J Urol. 2024;31:852–858.
  3. Costantini M, Lazzeri V, Del Bini M, Zingaro A, Zucchi MP. Pelvic organ prolapse repair with and without prophylactic concomitant Burch colposuspension in continent women: a randomized, controlled trial with 8‐year followup. J Urol. 2011;185:2234–2236.
  4. Illiano E, Ditonno P, Giannitsas K, De Rienzo G, Bini V, Costantini E. Robot‐assisted vs laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for high‐stage pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective, randomized, single‐center study. Urology. 2019;134:116–123.
  5. Illiano E, Giannitsas K, Costantini E. Comparison between laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy and hysteropexy in advanced urogenital prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2020;31:2069–2074.

MeSH Term

Humans
Surgical Mesh
Female
Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Postoperative Complications
Treatment Outcome
Observational Studies as Topic
Gynecologic Surgical Procedures
Vagina
Multicenter Studies as Topic

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EditorialCommentAnatomicaloutcomescomplicationssacrocolpopexyusingsureliftupliftmesh:multicentricobservationalstudy

Similar Articles

Cited By