The impact of digital finance on technological innovation across enterprise life cycles in China.

Yanhong Mou
Author Information
  1. Yanhong Mou: Chongqing City Management College, Chongqing, China.

Abstract

This study aims to fill a gap in our knowledge by analyzing how digital financing has affected technological innovation in China's firms across different growth phases. This article investigates the relationship between technological innovation efficiency and digital finance in China's A-share listed corporations between 2012 and 2022 using basic logistic modelling. Its main goal is to comprehend how digital finance affects these businesses' technological innovation efficiency from various angles. The study concludes that digital finance significantly improves the efficiency of technological innovation; more importantly, the Digital Finance Adoption Rate (DFAR) has a more significant influence than the Digital Finance Level (DFL). According to the Digital Transformation Maturity (DTM) scale, digital finance helps businesses transform digitally, increasing the effectiveness of technological innovation. State-owned businesses are more affected by the influence of digital finance on innovation efficiency than non-state-owned businesses. Other factors, including enterprise lifecycle, innovation investment, digital leadership, revenue strategies, and market rivalry, also shape the relationship between digital finance and technical innovation efficiency. To increase innovation efficiency, particularly in state-owned businesses, the study suggests expanding access to and adoption of digital finance. It also means leveraging elements such as enterprise lifecycle, innovation investment, digital leadership, revenue strategies, and market competition to spur more technological innovation. The impact of digital finance on technological innovation at different phases of organizational growth in China highlights the need for customized methods to harness its potential.

Keywords

References

  1. J Environ Manage. 2023 Jun 1;335:117554 [PMID: 36863147]
  2. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(58):87884-87900 [PMID: 35819670]
  3. Int J Equity Health. 2019 May 31;18(1):79 [PMID: 31151447]
  4. J Environ Manage. 2022 Oct 15;320:115833 [PMID: 35940011]
  5. Sci Total Environ. 2022 Sep 10;838(Pt 3):156463 [PMID: 35660603]
  6. PLoS One. 2022 Aug 29;17(8):e0273680 [PMID: 36037191]
  7. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 28;19(21): [PMID: 36360975]
  8. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar;28(9):10642-10653 [PMID: 33098557]
  9. J Environ Manage. 2023 Mar 15;330:117125 [PMID: 36603250]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0innovationdigitalfinancetechnologicalefficiencyDigitalbusinessesstudyenterpriseaffectedChina'sacrossdifferentgrowthphasesrelationshipFinanceinfluencelifecycleinvestmentleadershiprevenuestrategiesmarketalsoimpactChinalifecyclesaimsfillgapknowledgeanalyzingfinancingfirmsarticleinvestigatesA-sharelistedcorporations20122022usingbasiclogisticmodellingmaingoalcomprehendaffectsbusinesses'variousanglesconcludessignificantlyimprovesimportantlyAdoptionRateDFARsignificantLevelDFLAccordingTransformationMaturityDTMscalehelpstransformdigitallyincreasingeffectivenessState-ownednon-state-ownedfactorsincludingrivalryshapetechnicalincreaseparticularlystate-ownedsuggestsexpandingaccessadoptionmeansleveragingelementscompetitionspurorganizationalhighlightsneedcustomizedmethodsharnesspotentialtransformationEnterpriseInnovationTechnological

Similar Articles

Cited By