Exploring health equity integration among health service and delivery systems in Nova Scotia: perspectives of health system partners.

Joshua Yusuf, Ninoshka J D'Souza, Hilary A T Caldwell, Sarah Meaghan Sim, Mark Embrett, Sara F L Kirk
Author Information
  1. Joshua Yusuf: School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, 6230 South St, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada.
  2. Ninoshka J D'Souza: Healthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University, 1318 Robie St, Halifax, Halifax, NS, B3H 3E2, Canada.
  3. Hilary A T Caldwell: Healthy Populations Institute, Dalhousie University, 1318 Robie St, Halifax, Halifax, NS, B3H 3E2, Canada.
  4. Sarah Meaghan Sim: Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada.
  5. Mark Embrett: Nova Scotia Health, Halifax, Canada.
  6. Sara F L Kirk: School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, 6230 South St, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada. Sara.Kirk@dal.ca.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Achieving health equity is important to improve population health; however, health equity is not typically well defined, integrated, or measured within health service and delivery systems. To improve population health, it is necessary to understand barriers and facilitators to health equity integration within health service and delivery systems. This study aimed to explore health equity integration among health systems workers and identify key barriers and facilitators to implementing health equity strategies within the health service and delivery system in Nova Scotia, ahead of the release of a Health Equity Framework, focused on addressing inequities within publicly funded institutions.
METHODS: Purposive sampling was used to recruit individuals working on health equity initiatives including those in high-level leadership positions within the Nova Scotia health system. Individual interviews and a joint interview session were conducted. Topics of discussion included current integration of health equity through existing strategies and perceptions within participant roles. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was used to guide coding and analysis, with interviews transcribed and deductively analyzed in NVivo. Qualitative description was employed to describe study findings as barriers and facilitators to health equity integration.
RESULTS: Eleven individual interviews and one joint interview (n���=���5 participants) were conducted, a total of 16 participants. Half (n���=���8) of the participants were High-level Leaders (i.e., manager or higher) within the health system. We found that existing strategies within the health system were inadequate to address inequities, and variation in the use of indicators of health equity was indicative of a lack of health equity integration. Applying the CFIR allowed us to identify barriers to and facilitators of health equity integration, with the power of legislation to implement a Health Equity Framework, alongside the value of partnerships and engagement both being seen as key facilitators to support health equity integration. Barriers to health equity integration included inadequate resources devoted to health equity work, a lack of diversity among senior system leaders and concerns that existing efforts to integrate health equity were siloed.
CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that health equity integration needs to be prioritized within the health service and delivery system within Nova Scotia and identifies possible strategies for implementation. Appropriate measures, resources and partnerships need to be put in place to support health equity integration following the introduction of the Health Equity Framework, which was viewed as a key driver for action. Greater diversity within health system leadership was also identified as an important strategy to support integration. Our findings have implications for other jurisdictions seeking to advance health equity across health service and delivery systems.

Keywords

References

  1. J Adv Nurs. 2008 Apr;62(1):107-15 [PMID: 18352969]
  2. JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Aug 9;20(1):249-259 [PMID: 34374690]
  3. Implement Sci. 2021 Mar 19;16(1):28 [PMID: 33740999]
  4. Can J Public Health. 2021 Dec;112(6):1059-1068 [PMID: 34105113]
  5. JBI Evid Synth. 2024 Jun 01;22(6):949-1070 [PMID: 38632975]
  6. Health Promot Int. 2019 Dec 1;34(6):e71-e83 [PMID: 30107463]
  7. Acad Med. 2022 Dec 1;97(12):1746-1752 [PMID: 35904425]
  8. Int J Equity Health. 2020 Oct 28;19(1):192 [PMID: 33115482]
  9. Am J Public Health. 2015 Apr;105(4):670-9 [PMID: 24922130]
  10. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 15;(6):CD009905 [PMID: 26075988]
  11. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Sep;44(9):545-551 [PMID: 30166038]
  12. Implement Sci. 2016 May 17;11:72 [PMID: 27189233]
  13. Transl Behav Med. 2017 Sep;7(3):467-477 [PMID: 28573356]
  14. JAMA. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):521-522 [PMID: 35061006]
  15. Public Health Rep. 2014 Jan-Feb;129 Suppl 2:9-14 [PMID: 24385659]
  16. J Natl Med Assoc. 2020 Jun;112(3):247-249 [PMID: 32336480]
  17. Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75 [PMID: 36309746]
  18. Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Nov;7(6):A118 [PMID: 20950525]
  19. Int J Equity Health. 2020 Sep 15;19(1):162 [PMID: 32933539]
  20. Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec;58 Suppl 3:289-299 [PMID: 38015859]
  21. Learn Health Syst. 2021 Jun 22;5(3):e10279 [PMID: 34277945]
  22. J Urban Health. 2021 Aug;98(Suppl 1):4-14 [PMID: 34414512]
  23. AIMS Public Health. 2017 Nov 15;4(5):490-512 [PMID: 30155500]
  24. Int J Equity Health. 2016 Aug 19;15(1):129 [PMID: 27539080]
  25. Int J Equity Health. 2023 Nov 21;22(1):243 [PMID: 37990326]

Grants

  1. RPH170322/CIHR
  2. RPH170322/CIHR
  3. RPH170322/CIHR
  4. RPH170322/CIHR
  5. RPH170322/CIHR
  6. RPH170322/CIHR

MeSH Term

Humans
Nova Scotia
Health Equity
Delivery of Health Care
Qualitative Research
Interviews as Topic
Leadership
Male
Female

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthequityintegrationwithinsystemHealthservicedeliverysystemsfacilitatorsbarriersstrategiesNovaFrameworkamongkeyScotiaEquityinterviewsexistingfindingsparticipantssupportimportantimprovepopulationstudyidentifyinequitiesusedleadershipjointinterviewconductedincludedCFIRinadequatelackpartnershipsresourcesdiversityBACKGROUND:AchievinghowevertypicallywelldefinedintegratedmeasurednecessaryunderstandaimedexploreworkersimplementingaheadreleasefocusedaddressingpubliclyfundedinstitutionsMETHODS:Purposivesamplingrecruitindividualsworkinginitiativesincludinghigh-levelpositionsIndividualsessionTopicsdiscussioncurrentperceptionsparticipantrolesConsolidatedImplementationResearchguidecodinganalysistranscribeddeductivelyanalyzedNVivoQualitativedescriptionemployeddescribeRESULTS:Elevenindividualonen���=���5total16Halfn���=���8High-levelLeadersiemanagerhigherfoundaddressvariationuseindicatorsindicativeApplyingalloweduspowerlegislationimplementalongsidevalueengagementseenBarriersdevotedworkseniorleadersconcernseffortsintegratesiloedCONCLUSION:suggestneedsprioritizedidentifiespossibleimplementationAppropriatemeasuresneedputplacefollowingintroductionvieweddriveractionGreateralsoidentifiedstrategyimplicationsjurisdictionsseekingadvanceacrossExploringScotia:perspectivespartnersAttitudepersonnelDeliveryCarepriorities

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.