Navigating food price shocks in a pandemic: Food insecurity and coping mechanisms in Burkina Faso.

Shamma Adeeb Alam, Shi Xi Liu, Claus C P��rtner
Author Information
  1. Shamma Adeeb Alam: Department of Economics, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA, United States.
  2. Shi Xi Liu: Department of Economics, Dickinson College, Carlisle, PA, United States.
  3. Claus C P��rtner: Albers School of Business and Economics, Seattle University, Seattle, WA, United States.

Abstract

Global food prices rose substantially after the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. This paper examines the impact of rising food prices during the pandemic on food security in Burkina Faso. We aim to answer two primary questions. First, how do food price shocks affect household food insecurity? Second, what coping strategies do households adopt in response to these price shocks? Leveraging country-wide high-frequency longitudinal data, we employ household fixed effect models to examine the effects. In the absence of direct information on local food prices, we use household-reported price shocks to capture province-level price increases and show that the results are consistent with national-level price increases. We find significant and immediate increases in food insecurity following the price shocks, and this effect persists for at least two months. The price shocks most acutely affected the poorest households. Furthermore, food insecurity increased more in rural areas than in urban areas. The higher proportion of poorer households in rural areas explains part of this difference. We find that households primarily cope with the shock by relying on increased assistance from relatives in Burkina Faso and abroad. This study is the first to use panel data with household fixed effects to examine the repercussions of the rise in food prices during the pandemic on food insecurity in a developing country and to examine the coping mechanisms employed by households. Given that food prices are likely to remain high globally for an extended period, our findings carry implications for the broader developing world. Furthermore, given the disproportionate effect on the poorest and those living in rural areas, the findings highlight the need for policies to mitigate the negative impacts of the price shocks and enhance overall food security in countries like Burkina Faso.

Keywords

References

  1. Soc Sci Med. 2012 Dec;75(12):2412-9 [PMID: 23062966]
  2. Agric Syst. 2021 May;190:103092 [PMID: 36567889]
  3. Soc Sci Med. 2011 Nov;73(10):1534-42 [PMID: 21996022]
  4. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2021 Jun 23;105(2):295-309 [PMID: 34161300]
  5. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 10;17(16): [PMID: 32785155]
  6. World Dev. 2021 Jan;137:105199 [PMID: 32982018]
  7. J Health Econ. 2015 Dec;44:161-75 [PMID: 26499960]
  8. Sci Rep. 2022 Jan 31;12(1):1638 [PMID: 35102220]
  9. Sci Adv. 2021 Feb 5;7(6): [PMID: 33547077]

Grants

  1. P2C HD042828/NICHD NIH HHS
  2. R24 HD042828/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0foodpriceshockspricesBurkinaFasohouseholdsinsecuritycopingareaspandemichouseholdeffectexamineincreasesruralmechanismsCOVID-19securitytwodatafixedeffectsusefindpoorestFurthermoreincreaseddevelopingfindingsFoodGlobalrosesubstantiallystartpaperexaminesimpactrisingaimanswerprimaryquestionsFirstaffectinsecurity?Secondstrategiesadoptresponseshocks?Leveragingcountry-widehigh-frequencylongitudinalemploymodelsabsencedirectinformationlocalhousehold-reportedcaptureprovince-levelshowresultsconsistentnational-levelsignificantimmediatefollowingpersistsleastmonthsacutelyaffectedurbanhigherproportionpoorerexplainspartdifferenceprimarilycopeshockrelyingassistancerelativesabroadstudyfirstpanelrepercussionsrisecountryemployedGivenlikelyremainhighgloballyextendedperiodcarryimplicationsbroaderworldgivendisproportionatelivinghighlightneedpoliciesmitigatenegativeimpactsenhanceoverallcountrieslikeNavigatingpandemic:E31O12Q18

Similar Articles

Cited By