Do We Know the Long-Term Effects of the Most Popular Traditional Swallow Maneuvers on the Submental Muscles?

Ay��e K��bra S��yler, Nefati K��yl��o��lu, Selen Serel Arslan, Numan Demir, Mustafa G��k, Ersen Ertekin, T��lin D��ger
Author Information
  1. Ay��e K��bra S��yler: Faculty of Health Science, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Ayd��n Adnan Menderes University, Ayd��n, Turkey. ORCID
  2. Nefati K��yl��o��lu: Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Ayd��n Adnan Menderes University, Ayd��n, Turkey.
  3. Selen Serel Arslan: Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey. ORCID
  4. Numan Demir: Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
  5. Mustafa G��k: Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ayd��n Adnan Menderes University, Ayd��n, Turkey.
  6. Ersen Ertekin: Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Hitit University, Corum, Turkey.
  7. T��lin D��ger: Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various trainings focus on the submental muscles (SMs) for dysphagia rehabilitation because of their importance for swallowing safety and efficiency. According to the current literature, swallow-specific tasks may be optimal exercises for dysphagia. The effortful swallow (ES) and the Masako maneuver (MM) are the most commonly used swallow-specific tasks in the clinical settings for dysphagia for years, but long-term effects for these trainings is insufficient.
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to investigate and compare the effects of ES and MM on SM activity, strength and thickness.
METHODS: Thirty-seven healthy adults were randomised to ES, MM and control groups, and ES and MM groups completed 6���weeks of swallowing training. Participants in both training groups performed a total of 120 swallows in each session, while control group did not participate in any swallowing training. Surface electromyography was used to evaluate SM activity, digital dynamometer for SM strength and ultrasonography for SM thickness.
RESULTS: Both trainings did not change SM activity (p���>���0.05), but increased SM strength (p���<���0.05). MM increased the thickness of all SM (p���<���0.05), and ES increased the thickness of mylohyoid (right, left) and digastric muscle (right) (p���<���0.05), and there was no change in all evaluation parameters in the control group (p���>���0.05). Also, trainings were not superior to each other in any parameter (p���>���0.05).
CONCLUSION: The results of this study provided new evidence to the literature to show that ES and MM trainings are effective for improving SM strength and thickness. Considering that SM is important in terms of swallowing safety and effectiveness, it is thought that both trainings may be promising by increasing the strength and mass of SM, especially in individuals with reduced SM strength and mass.

Keywords

References

  1. Dysphagia. 2021 Apr;36(2):281-292 [PMID: 32445060]
  2. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Sep-Oct;66:127-33 [PMID: 27318884]
  3. Eur J Transl Myol. 2020 Sep 09;30(3):9311 [PMID: 33117512]
  4. Dysphagia. 2021 Feb;36(1):1-32 [PMID: 32140905]
  5. Dysphagia. 2022 Feb;37(1):158-167 [PMID: 33566219]
  6. Dysphagia. 2016 Oct;31(5):680-6 [PMID: 27461480]
  7. Med Ultrason. 2020 Sep 5;22(3):299-304 [PMID: 32399534]
  8. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2018 Nov;54(4):151-159 [PMID: 30302133]
  9. Dysphagia. 2007 Jul;22(3):251-65 [PMID: 17457549]
  10. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2019 May;54(3):479-484 [PMID: 30693627]
  11. Exp Gerontol. 2018 Sep;110:133-138 [PMID: 29894751]
  12. Dysphagia. 2015 Aug;30(4):392-403 [PMID: 25840788]
  13. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Sep 18;99(38):e22136 [PMID: 32957335]
  14. Front Physiol. 2022 Jun 08;13:881891 [PMID: 35755433]
  15. Dysphagia. 2020 Aug;35(4):717-724 [PMID: 31768618]
  16. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 May;95(5):867-74 [PMID: 24055575]
  17. Clin Interv Aging. 2019 Feb 11;14:283-288 [PMID: 30804667]
  18. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2002 Feb;34(2):364-80 [PMID: 11828249]
  19. Dysphagia. 2019 Jun;34(3):382-390 [PMID: 30251147]
  20. Springerplus. 2016 Jul 21;5(1):1144 [PMID: 27504242]
  21. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2013;231(3):223-8 [PMID: 24240663]
  22. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020 Aug 4;29(3):1655-1673 [PMID: 32463714]
  23. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 1;85(3):735-40 [PMID: 22995662]
  24. Dysphagia. 2021 Jun;36(3):465-473 [PMID: 32720053]
  25. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Jan 12;65(1):136-145 [PMID: 34929106]
  26. J Oral Rehabil. 2023 Jul;50(7):580-586 [PMID: 36932464]
  27. Dysphagia. 2021 Oct;36(5):936-943 [PMID: 33386483]
  28. Dysphagia. 2013 Dec;28(4):539-47 [PMID: 23576155]

MeSH Term

Humans
Deglutition
Male
Deglutition Disorders
Female
Electromyography
Neck Muscles
Adult
Muscle Strength
Healthy Volunteers
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography
Young Adult
Exercise Therapy

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0SMstrengthtrainingsESMMthickness05swallowingdysphagiaactivitycontrolgroupstrainingp���>���0increasedp���<���0musclesafetyliteratureswallow-specifictasksmayeffortfulswallowmaneuverusedeffectsstudygroupelectromyographychangerightmassBACKGROUND:VariousfocussubmentalmusclesSMsrehabilitationimportanceefficiencyAccordingcurrentoptimalexercisesMasakocommonlyclinicalsettingsyearslong-terminsufficientOBJECTIVES:aimsinvestigatecompareMETHODS:Thirty-sevenhealthyadultsrandomisedcompleted6���weeksParticipantsperformedtotal120swallowssessionparticipateSurfaceevaluatedigitaldynamometerultrasonographyRESULTS:mylohyoidleftdigastricevaluationparametersAlsosuperiorparameterCONCLUSION:resultsprovidednewevidenceshoweffectiveimprovingConsideringimportanttermseffectivenessthoughtpromisingincreasingespeciallyindividualsreducedKnowLong-TermEffectsPopularTraditionalSwallowManeuversSubmentalMuscles?Masakodeglutition

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.