Service Engagement Among People Experiencing Homelessness and Mental Disorders: A Call for Person-centred Innovations.

Vicky Stergiopoulos, Nick Kerman, Nadine Reid
Author Information
  1. Vicky Stergiopoulos: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada. Vicky.Stergiopoulos@camh.ca. ORCID
  2. Nick Kerman: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  3. Nadine Reid: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Abstract

In recent years, there has been increased support for the use of coercive policies to address the seemingly intractable problem of Homelessness among People with Mental Disorders in North America. Although these policy approaches respond to a critical issue, rising rates of unsheltered Homelessness, low service engagement and concerns about disruptive behaviors in public settings, they are unlikely on their own to be successful. To avoid coercive practices, there is an urgent need to consider alternative, person-centred approaches to promote service engagement among People experiencing Homelessness and Mental Disorders, with input from those with lived experience and frontline homeless service providers. Three person-centred approaches are proposed for consideration: (1) cross-sectoral service delivery models, (2) peer-led services, and (3) financial incentives. These approaches merit further study to support voluntary treatment engagement and exits from Homelessness among People with mental and substance use disorders and safeguard the human rights of this population.

Keywords

References

  1. Barker, S. L., & Maguire, N. (2017). Experts by experience: Peer support and its use with the homeless. Community Mental Health Journal, 53, 598���612. [DOI: 10.1007/s10597-017-0102-2]
  2. Behavioral Health Information Notice No. 22���056. Sacramento, CA, State of California���Health and Human Services Agency, 2022. https://www.dhcs.ca.gov/Documents/BHIN-22-056-The-Recovery-Incentives-Program-Californias-Contingency-Management-Benefit.pdf . Accessed on March 9, 2023
  3. Benishek, L. A., Dugosh, K. L., Kirby, K. C., et al. (2014). Prize-based contingency management for the treatment of substance abusers: A meta-analysis. Addiction, 109, 1426���1436. [DOI: 10.1111/add.12589]
  4. Bromley, E., Koushkaki, S. R., Davis, L. G., et al. (2024). Addressing mental health disability in unsheltered homelessness: Outpatient conservatorship in Los Angeles. Psychiatric Services, 75, 689���698. [DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20230235]
  5. Carver, H., Ring, N., Miler, J., et al. (2020). What constitutes effective problematic substance use treatment from the perspective of people who are homeless? A systematic review and meta-ethnography. Harm Reduction Journal, 17, 10. [DOI: 10.1186/s12954-020-0356-9]
  6. Cocozza, J. J., Steadman, H. J., Dennis, D. L., et al. (2000). Successful systems integration strategies: The ACCESS program for persons who are homeless and mentally ill. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 27, 395���407. [DOI: 10.1023/A]
  7. Davidson, L., Bellamy, C., Guy, K., et al. (2012). Peer support among persons with severe mental illness: A review of evidence and experience. World Psychiatry, 11, 123���128. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wpsyc.2012.05.009]
  8. Dixon, L. B., Holoshitz, Y., & Nossel, I. (2016). Treatment engagement of individuals experiencing mental illness: Review and update. World Psychiatry, 15, 13���20. [DOI: 10.1002/wps.20306]
  9. Gelberg, L., Gallagher, T. C., Andersen, R. M., et al. (1997). Competing priorities as a barrier to medical care among homeless adults in Los Angeles. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 217���220. [DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.87.2.217]
  10. Goldman, H. H., Morrissey, J. P., Rosenheck, R. A., et al. (2002). Lessons from the evaluation of the ACCESS program. Psychiatric Services, 53, 967���970. [DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.53.8.967]
  11. Hollenberg, E., Bani-Fatemi, A., Durbin, A., et al. (2022). Using financial incentives to improve health service engagement and outcomes of adults experiencing homelessness: A scoping review of the literature. Health and Social Care in the Community, 30, e3406���e3434. [DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13944]
  12. Kerman, N., Kidd, S. A., & Stergiopoulos, V. (2024). Involuntary hospitalization and coercive treatment of people with mental illness experiencing homelessness���going backward with foreseeable harms. JAMA Psychiatry, 80, 531���532. [DOI: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2023.0537]
  13. Kerman, N., Nisenbaum, R., Durbin, A., et al. (2023). A pragmatic randomized controlled trial of financial incentives in case management for homeless adults with mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 74, 823���829. [DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.20220392]
  14. Kerman, N., & Stergiopoulos, V. (2024). Addressing health needs in people with mental illness experiencing homelessness. Nat Mental Health, 2, 354���366. [DOI: 10.1038/s44220-024-00218-0]
  15. Lalibert��, V., Roussel-Bergeron, D., Latimer, E. A., et al. (2022). PRISM: A shelter-based partnership for people experiencing homelessness and service mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 73, 467���469. [DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000682]
  16. Magwood, O., Leki, V. Y., Kpade, V., et al. (2019). Common trust and personal safety issues: A systematic review on the acceptability of health and social interventions for persons with lived experience of homelessness. PLoS One, 14, e0226306. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226306]
  17. Reid, N., Brown, R., Pedersen, C., et al. (2022a). Using financial incentives to support service engagement of adults experiencing homelessness and mental illness: A qualitative analysis of key stakeholder perspectives. Health Expectations, 25, 984���993. [DOI: 10.1111/hex.13442]
  18. Reid, N., Buchman, D., Brown, R., et al. (2022b). The acceptability of financial incentives to support service engagement of adults experiencing homelessness and mental illness: A qualitative study of key stakeholder perspectives. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 49, 1060���1071. [DOI: 10.1007/s10488-022-01217-y]
  19. Reid, N., Kron, A., Lamanna, D., et al. (2021). Building Bridges to Housing for homeless adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Outcomes of a cross-sector intervention. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 34, 16���27. [DOI: 10.1111/jar.12779]
  20. Schueller, S. M., Hunter, J. F., Figueroa, C., et al. (2019). Use of digital mental health for marginalized and underserved populations. Curr Treat Options Psychiatry, 6, 243���255. [DOI: 10.1007/s40501-019-00181-z]
  21. Skosireva, A., O���Campo, P., Zerger, S., et al. (2014). Different faces of discrimination: Perceived discrimination among homeless adults with mental illness in healthcare settings. BMC Health Services Research, 14, 376. [DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-376]
  22. Yamin, S., Aubry, T., Volk, J., et al. (2014). Peer supportive housing for consuemrs of housing first who experience ongoing housing instability. Canadian Journal of Community Mental Health, 33, 61���76. [DOI: 10.7870/cjcmh-2014-034]

MeSH Term

Humans
Ill-Housed Persons
Mental Disorders
Patient-Centered Care
Mental Health Services
Peer Group
Motivation
Coercion

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0homelessnessapproachesserviceengagementamongpeoplementaldisorderssupportusecoerciveperson-centredServiceHomelessnessrecentyearsincreasedpoliciesaddressseeminglyintractableproblemNorthAmericaAlthoughpolicyrespondcriticalissuerisingratesunshelteredlowconcernsdisruptivebehaviorspublicsettingsunlikelysuccessfulavoidpracticesurgentneedconsideralternativepromoteexperiencinginputlivedexperiencefrontlinehomelessprovidersThreeproposedconsideration:1cross-sectoraldeliverymodels2peer-ledservices3financialincentivesmeritstudyvoluntarytreatmentexitssubstancesafeguardhumanrightspopulationEngagementAmongPeopleExperiencingMentalDisorders:CallPerson-centredInnovationsCoercion

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.