Fatalism or vigilance? Exposure to infant and maternal deaths and subsequent use of maternal health services in Malawi.

Eric Lungu, Jeffrey Rozelle, Emily Smith-Greenaway
Author Information
  1. Eric Lungu: Partners in Hope.
  2. Jeffrey Rozelle: University of Southern California.
  3. Emily Smith-Greenaway: University of Southern California.

Abstract

In developing contexts, where formal health services are still expanding, understanding what factors discourage individuals from using health services is critical to advance population health. A long theorized, but rarely investigated, conjecture is that in high-mortality contexts, exposure to death can beget fatalism, or even foster distrust of formal healthcare, locking families into cycles of low use of health services. A counter perspective, however, suggests exposure to death can encourage individuals' health vigilance, corresponding with their higher use of health services. We test these competing ideas by analyzing the associations between women's intimate exposure to death in the context of pregnancy and delivery via (1) a sister's maternal death and (2) an infant child's neonatal death, and their subsequent use of maternal health services. We focus on the context of Malawi, a setting that features high maternal and infant mortality rates, similar to those observed across much of sub-Saharan Africa, as well as persistent gaps in service use. Specifically, we use Malawi Demographic and Health Survey (2015-16) data to examine if a sister's maternal death or a child's neonatal death corresponds with a woman's odds of attending full antenatal care during a subsequent pregnancy or delivering the pregnancy at a formal health facility. Given the qualitatively distinct nature of losing one's only or first child, we also assess if the effect of a child's neonatal death varies by birth order. The results show that maternal and neonate death exposures correspond generally with women's higher use of maternal health services, challenging the notion that exposure to death fosters fatalism or distrust. Although the results vary in significance, the nuanced findings highlight women's vigilance in the face of health threats, emphasizing their resilience amid a high burden of familial loss.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Public Health. 2011 Apr 13;11 Suppl 3:S11 [PMID: 21501428]
  2. PLoS One. 2020 Oct 14;15(10):e0236498 [PMID: 33052952]
  3. Soc Sci Med. 2019 Jan;220:441-449 [PMID: 30467084]
  4. Demography. 2022 Apr 1;59(2):563-585 [PMID: 35262689]
  5. Demogr Res. 2009 Jun 23;20:817-874 [PMID: 19946378]
  6. PLoS One. 2016 Apr 21;11(4):e0154103 [PMID: 27101407]
  7. Lancet. 2014 Aug 2;384(9941):438-54 [PMID: 24853600]
  8. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Feb 11;13:55 [PMID: 23394591]
  9. Health Policy Plan. 1996 Mar;11(1):1-15 [PMID: 10155875]
  10. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015 Sep;100(5):F439-47 [PMID: 25972443]
  11. Soc Sci Med. 2020 Jan 9;250:112795 [PMID: 32145482]
  12. Demography. 2019 Jun;56(3):935-968 [PMID: 31062199]
  13. Lancet. 2001 May 19;357(9268):1551-64 [PMID: 11377642]
  14. BMC Public Health. 2014 May 29;14:521 [PMID: 24886517]
  15. Lancet. 2014 Jul 26;384(9940):347-70 [PMID: 24853604]
  16. PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e52110 [PMID: 23300599]
  17. Afr J Reprod Health. 2013 Sep;17(3):30-43 [PMID: 24069765]
  18. PLoS Med. 2016 Oct 18;13(10):e1002151 [PMID: 27755547]
  19. Etude Popul Afr. 2011;25(2):419-439 [PMID: 26430294]
  20. PLoS Med. 2021 Dec 1;18(12):e1003843 [PMID: 34851947]
  21. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009 Oct;107 Suppl 1:S47-62, S63-4 [PMID: 19815203]
  22. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 May 22;14:234 [PMID: 24884788]
  23. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Mar 6;21(1):192 [PMID: 33676440]
  24. BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Apr;6(4): [PMID: 33824177]
  25. Demography. 2015 Feb;52(1):15-38 [PMID: 25585644]
  26. J Risk Uncertain. 2022;64(2):147-190 [PMID: 35669928]
  27. Glob Public Health. 2017 Jun;12(6):757-779 [PMID: 27696987]
  28. Demography. 2016 Jun;53(3):805-34 [PMID: 27150965]
  29. Lancet. 2005 Mar 12-18;365(9463):977-88 [PMID: 15767001]
  30. BMJ Glob Health. 2016 Aug 16;1(2):e000085 [PMID: 28588940]
  31. Demography. 2020 Feb;57(1):347-371 [PMID: 31989537]
  32. Health Policy Plan. 2016 Sep;31(7):844-52 [PMID: 26864163]
  33. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 28;11(12):e0168743 [PMID: 28030594]
  34. PLoS One. 2022 Dec 30;17(12):e0279613 [PMID: 36584165]
  35. BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 18;3(12):e004150 [PMID: 24353257]
  36. Lancet. 2006 Apr 1;367(9516):1066-1074 [PMID: 16581405]
  37. Death Stud. 1997 Sep-Oct;21(5):477-99 [PMID: 10175164]
  38. Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Sep;84(9):699-705 [PMID: 17128339]

Grants

  1. R03 HD105834/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthdeathusematernalservicesexposureformalwomen'spregnancyinfantchild'sneonatalsubsequentMalawimortalitycontextscanfatalismdistrustvigilancehighercontextsister'shighserviceHealthresultsdevelopingstillexpandingunderstandingfactorsdiscourageindividualsusingcriticaladvancepopulationlongtheorizedrarelyinvestigatedconjecturehigh-mortalitybegetevenfosterhealthcarelockingfamiliescycleslowcounterperspectivehoweversuggestsencourageindividuals'correspondingtestcompetingideasanalyzingassociationsintimatedeliveryvia12focussettingfeaturesratessimilarobservedacrossmuchsub-SaharanAfricawellpersistentgapsSpecificallyDemographicSurvey2015-16dataexaminecorrespondswoman'soddsattendingfullantenatalcaredeliveringfacilityGivenqualitativelydistinctnaturelosingone'sfirstchildalsoassesseffectvariesbirthordershowneonateexposurescorrespondgenerallychallengingnotionfostersAlthoughvarysignificancenuancedfindingshighlightfacethreatsemphasizingresilienceamidburdenfamiliallossFatalismvigilance?ExposuredeathsBereavementInfantLossMaternalReproductive

Similar Articles

Cited By