Qualitative evaluation of factors influencing adherence to virtual exercise programs for people with physical disabilities.

Madison Mintz, Christine Ferguson, Leigh Anne Bray Dayton, Jereme Wilroy, James H Rimmer
Author Information
  1. Madison Mintz: Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
  2. Christine Ferguson: Department of Physical Therapy, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
  3. Leigh Anne Bray Dayton: Capstone College of Nursing, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, United States.
  4. Jereme Wilroy: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Heersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.
  5. James H Rimmer: School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States.

Abstract

Virtual community-based programming for people with disabilities has become a popular method for advocating for health promotion, specifically exercise, for people with disabilities (PWD). Using theoretical frameworks to better understand the perspective of PWD who participate in virtual exercise programs allows strategies of implementation following completion of virtual exercise programs. The objective of this study was to examine the effect adherence had on perceptions, experiences, and post-program exercise maintenance in participants with disabilities. Eight qualitative interviews were conducted in highly adherent participants using the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT). Interviews were recorded on Zoom, transcribed using Microsoft 365, and analyzed using NVivo software. Data were analyzed by the primary author and an independent coder to increase rigor and reduce bias. Thirty-five unique codes were generated from transcribed interviews. Member-checking was employed to increase internal validity; 100% of participants agreed with the findings. Results demonstrate an overall positive experience in the virtual exercise program, noting specific facilitators (i.e., knowledgeable instructor, program provided equipment, etc.) and barriers (i.e., limited physical space at home to exercise, other participant's attitudes, etc.) of participating. Impressionably, 100% of participants maintained exercise following their time within the virtual exercise program.

Keywords

References

  1. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2016 Jul 14;3(2):e8 [PMID: 28582252]
  2. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 14;15(3): [PMID: 29538292]
  3. Prev Chronic Dis. 2024 Jan 04;21:E02 [PMID: 38176696]
  4. Health Educ Res. 2020 Aug 1;35(4):270-282 [PMID: 32535626]
  5. Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Apr;42(7):948-956 [PMID: 30512979]
  6. Disabil Health J. 2020 Jul;13(3):100888 [PMID: 32061542]
  7. J Rehabil Med. 2009 Nov;41(11):881-5 [PMID: 19841838]
  8. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018 Aug 17;67(32):882-887 [PMID: 30114005]
  9. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(1):1-10 [PMID: 25586798]
  10. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2018 Dec;15(12):731-743 [PMID: 30115967]
  11. Disabil Health J. 2012 Oct;5(4):254-60 [PMID: 23021736]
  12. Health Psychol Rev. 2017 Jun;11(2):179-196 [PMID: 28278003]
  13. Disabil Health J. 2024 Apr;17(2):101577 [PMID: 38184471]
  14. Am J Prev Med. 2004 Jun;26(5):419-25 [PMID: 15165658]
  15. Phys Ther. 2021 Apr 4;101(4): [PMID: 33439254]
  16. Lancet. 2021 Jul 31;398(10298):443-455 [PMID: 34302764]
  17. Ann Behav Med. 2011 Aug;42(1):127-33 [PMID: 21544701]
  18. PM R. 2015 Oct;7(10):1081-1088 [PMID: 25828205]
  19. BMC Neurol. 2017 Sep 16;17(1):185 [PMID: 28915856]
  20. Adapt Phys Activ Q. 2017 Oct 1;34(4):421-441 [PMID: 28985104]
  21. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Oct;96(10):748-761 [PMID: 28398967]
  22. Mhealth. 2022 Apr 20;8:15 [PMID: 35449508]
  23. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(26):2216-22 [PMID: 19903131]
  24. Rehabil Process Outcome. 2019 Apr 17;8:1179572719843257 [PMID: 34497459]
  25. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Mar 10;:1-11 [PMID: 38462813]
  26. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2017 May;29(5):282-293 [PMID: 28266148]
  27. Brain Inj. 2022 Feb 23;36(3):359-367 [PMID: 35377820]
  28. Disabil Health J. 2023 Jan;16(1):101395 [PMID: 36396586]
  29. Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Jun 10;3:917898 [PMID: 36189027]
  30. JMIR Aging. 2022 Dec 22;5(4):e40325 [PMID: 36548037]
  31. Health Psychol Rev. 2016 Dec;10(4):478-494 [PMID: 27265062]
  32. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 16;10(10):e0140596 [PMID: 26474157]

Grants

  1. P30 DK056336/NIDDK NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0exercisevirtualdisabilitiespeopleprogramsparticipantsprogramadherenceusingphysicalPWDfollowingqualitativeinterviewsSCTtranscribedanalyzedincrease100%ieetcevaluationVirtualcommunity-basedprogrammingbecomepopularmethodadvocatinghealthpromotionspecificallyUsingtheoreticalframeworksbetterunderstandperspectiveparticipateallowsstrategiesimplementationcompletionobjectivestudyexamineeffectperceptionsexperiencespost-programmaintenanceEightconductedhighlyadherentSocialCognitiveTheoryInterviewsrecordedZoomMicrosoft365NVivosoftwareDataprimaryauthorindependentcoderrigorreducebiasThirty-fiveuniquecodesgeneratedMember-checkingemployedinternalvalidityagreedfindingsResultsdemonstrateoverallpositiveexperiencenotingspecificfacilitatorsknowledgeableinstructorprovidedequipmentbarrierslimitedspacehomeparticipant'sattitudesparticipatingImpressionablymaintainedtimewithinQualitativefactorsinfluencingcommunitysocialcognitivetheory

Similar Articles

Cited By