Genetic and environmental contributions to adult attachment styles: Evidence from the Minnesota Twin Registry.

Keely A Dugan, Jacob J Kunkel, R Chris Fraley, D A Briley, Matt McGue, Robert F Krueger, Glenn I Roisman
Author Information
  1. Keely A Dugan: Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri-Columbia. ORCID
  2. Jacob J Kunkel: Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
  3. R Chris Fraley: Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
  4. D A Briley: Department of Psychology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.
  5. Matt McGue: Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
  6. Robert F Krueger: Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.
  7. Glenn I Roisman: Institute of Child Development, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.

Abstract

Attachment theory, as originally outlined by Bowlby (1973, 1980, 1969/1982), suggests that the ways people think, feel, and behave in close relationships are shaped by the dynamic interplay between their genes and their social environment. Research on adult attachment, however, has largely focused on the latter, providing only a partial picture of how attachment styles emerge and develop throughout life. The present research leveraged data from the Minnesota Twin Registry, a large sample of older adult twins ( = 1,377 twins; 678 pairs; = 70.40 years, = 5.42), to examine the relative contributions of genetic and environmental factors to adult attachment styles. Participants reported on both their attachment styles and attachments to their mothers, fathers, partners, and best friends. The results suggest that attachment styles are partly heritable (���36%) and partly attributable to environmental factors that are not shared between twins (���64%). Heritability estimates were somewhat higher for parent-specific attachment styles (���51%), whereas nonshared environmental factors accounted for larger proportions of the variance in partner- and best friend-specific attachment styles. Using multivariate biometric models, we also examined the genetic and environmental factors underlying the covariation among people's relationship-specific attachment styles. The findings indicate that the similarities among people's avoidant tendencies in different relationships can be explained by a single, higher order latent factor (e.g., global avoidance). In contrast, the genetic and environmental factors underlying attachment anxiety appear to be more differentiated across specific close relationships. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

References

  1. Child Dev. 2003 Nov-Dec;74(6):1769-82 [PMID: 14669895]
  2. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1990;39(1):35-70 [PMID: 2392892]
  3. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Apr;32(4):552-60 [PMID: 16513806]
  4. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Jan;90(1):78-93 [PMID: 16448311]
  5. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Sep;95(3):628-47 [PMID: 18729699]
  6. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Jan;34(1):3-16 [PMID: 18162654]
  7. Psychol Bull. 2014 Mar;140(2):544-86 [PMID: 24016230]
  8. Dev Psychol. 2014 Nov;50(11):2526-2538 [PMID: 25264703]
  9. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1995;60(2-3):179-96 [PMID: 8559156]
  10. J Fam Psychol. 2016 Sep;30(6):698-707 [PMID: 27336180]
  11. Psychol Bull. 2014 Sep;140(5):1303-31 [PMID: 24956122]
  12. Behav Genet. 2013 Jan;43(1):71-84 [PMID: 23090766]
  13. Psychol Bull. 2018 May;144(5):532-555 [PMID: 29494194]
  14. Behav Genet. 2004 Nov;34(6):593-610 [PMID: 15520516]
  15. Psychol Bull. 2017 Jan;143(1):107-113 [PMID: 28004961]
  16. Psychol Assess. 2011 Sep;23(3):615-25 [PMID: 21443364]
  17. Behav Genet. 2015 Mar;45(2):137-56 [PMID: 25715755]
  18. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Apr 1;233:109378 [PMID: 35248999]
  19. Psychol Sci. 2016 Feb;27(2):138-149 [PMID: 26671911]
  20. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Dec;31(12):1665-82 [PMID: 16254087]
  21. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014 Sep;55(9):1033-41 [PMID: 24256475]
  22. Child Dev. 1999 Sep-Oct;70(5):1151-62 [PMID: 10546338]
  23. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Oct;63(10):1113-20 [PMID: 17015813]
  24. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Dec;91(6):1045-65 [PMID: 17144764]
  25. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2020 May;112:254-269 [PMID: 32014527]
  26. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Apr;58(4):644-63 [PMID: 14570079]
  27. Behav Genet. 2012 Sep;42(5):743-63 [PMID: 22695681]
  28. Behav Genet. 1984 Jul;14(4):325-43 [PMID: 6542356]
  29. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2022 Nov;123(5):1089-1137 [PMID: 36201836]
  30. Acta Genet Med Gemellol (Roma). 1992;41(1):43-7 [PMID: 1488855]
  31. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Mar;38(3):308-16 [PMID: 22357709]
  32. Attach Hum Dev. 2015;17(3):288-301 [PMID: 25939396]
  33. Behav Genet. 2017 Mar;47(2):255-261 [PMID: 27866285]
  34. Child Dev. 1983 Apr;54(2):424-35 [PMID: 6683622]
  35. Behav Genet. 1990 Sep;20(5):569-608 [PMID: 2288547]
  36. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013 May;104(5):817-38 [PMID: 23397970]
  37. Behav Genet. 2015 Sep;45(5):581-96 [PMID: 26318287]
  38. Am J Psychiatry. 2019 May 1;176(5):376-387 [PMID: 30845820]
  39. Attach Hum Dev. 2007 Dec;9(4):375-91 [PMID: 18049934]
  40. Psychol Med. 2007 May;37(5):615-26 [PMID: 17176502]
  41. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Oct;85(4):709-22 [PMID: 14561124]
  42. Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Feb;25:6-10 [PMID: 29494853]
  43. J Pers. 2013 Apr;81(2):171-83 [PMID: 22583036]
  44. Attach Hum Dev. 2017 Aug;19(4):382-406 [PMID: 28440709]
  45. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013 Feb;16(1):476-80 [PMID: 23088829]
  46. Nord J Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;64(5):340-9 [PMID: 20337569]
  47. Attach Hum Dev. 2022 Jun;24(3):392-422 [PMID: 34528474]
  48. Attach Hum Dev. 2014;16(1):58-76 [PMID: 24215182]
  49. J Pers. 2017 Feb;85(1):51-64 [PMID: 26045299]
  50. Curr Opin Psychol. 2017 Jun;15:131-136 [PMID: 28813253]
  51. Dev Psychol. 2018 Dec;54(12):2356-2370 [PMID: 30335430]
  52. J Pers. 2008 Dec;76(6):1485-522 [PMID: 19012656]
  53. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2015 Jul 1;24(4):304-312 [PMID: 26556960]
  54. J Pers. 2011 Oct;79(5):965-91 [PMID: 21204839]
  55. Behav Genet. 2011 Jul;41(4):488-98 [PMID: 21213033]
  56. Dev Psychol. 2008 Jul;44(4):939-956 [PMID: 18605826]
  57. Attach Hum Dev. 2007 Jun;9(2):127-38 [PMID: 17508313]
  58. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2019 Apr;116(4):598-611 [PMID: 28771022]
  59. Behav Genet. 2016 Jul;46(4):552-72 [PMID: 26833465]
  60. Twin Res. 2002 Dec;5(6):554-71 [PMID: 12573187]
  61. Death Stud. 2005 May;29(4):277-99 [PMID: 15849880]
  62. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2007 Dec;48(12):1160-73 [PMID: 18093021]
  63. J Fam Psychol. 2004 Sep;18(3):545-9 [PMID: 15382980]
  64. Aging Ment Health. 2018 Jan;22(1):135-140 [PMID: 27624519]
  65. Behav Genet. 2012 Jan;42(1):170-86 [PMID: 21748401]
  66. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2003 Dec;29(12):1479-93 [PMID: 15018680]
  67. Psychol Bull. 2014 Jul;140(4):949-79 [PMID: 24611582]
  68. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015 Jan;10(1):37-59 [PMID: 25620996]
  69. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:401-422 [PMID: 30609910]
  70. World J Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 19;11(9):530-542 [PMID: 34631458]
  71. Behav Genet. 2014 Nov;44(6):591-604 [PMID: 24162101]
  72. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2007 Jun;10(3):423-33 [PMID: 17564500]
  73. Front Psychol. 2015 Mar 18;6:296 [PMID: 25852613]
  74. Child Dev. 2001 Sep-Oct;72(5):1501-11 [PMID: 11699684]
  75. Dev Psychopathol. 2018 Aug;30(3):891-903 [PMID: 30068421]
  76. Dev Psychol. 2006 Nov;42(6):1026-40 [PMID: 17087539]
  77. Psychol Sci. 2013 Sep;24(9):1704-13 [PMID: 23818655]
  78. Science. 1971 Dec 24;174(4016):1285-95 [PMID: 5167501]
  79. Struct Equ Modeling. 2018;25(4):621-638 [PMID: 30083048]
  80. Psychometrika. 2010 Jun;75(2):243-248 [PMID: 20640194]
  81. Twin Res. 2002 Oct;5(5):488-92 [PMID: 12537882]
  82. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1987 May;44(5):451-7 [PMID: 3579496]
  83. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2014 Feb;18(1):42-58 [PMID: 24026179]
  84. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2001 May;80(5):754-65 [PMID: 11374747]
  85. Dev Psychol. 2008 May;44(3):831-9 [PMID: 18473647]
  86. Behav Genet. 2024 Jul;54(4):321-332 [PMID: 38811431]
  87. Twin Res. 2000 Dec;3(4):242-50 [PMID: 11463145]

Grants

  1. R01 AG053217/NIA NIH HHS
  2. T32 MH015755/NIMH NIH HHS
  3. /NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Humans
Object Attachment
Female
Male
Minnesota
Registries
Aged
Middle Aged
Gene-Environment Interaction
Twins
Interpersonal Relations
Social Environment
Friends

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0attachmentstylesenvironmentalfactorsadultrelationshipstwins=geneticcloseMinnesotaTwinRegistrycontributionsbestpartlyhigherunderlyingamongpeople'sAttachmenttheoryoriginallyoutlinedBowlby197319801969/1982suggestswayspeoplethinkfeelbehaveshapeddynamicinterplaygenessocialenvironmentResearchhoweverlargelyfocusedlatterprovidingpartialpictureemergedevelopthroughoutlifepresentresearchleverageddatalargesampleolder1377678pairs7040years542examinerelativeParticipantsreportedattachmentsmothersfatherspartnersfriendsresultssuggestheritable���36%attributableshared���64%Heritabilityestimatessomewhatparent-specific���51%whereasnonsharedaccountedlargerproportionsvariancepartner-friend-specificUsingmultivariatebiometricmodelsalsoexaminedcovariationrelationship-specificfindingsindicatesimilaritiesavoidanttendenciesdifferentcanexplainedsingleorderlatentfactoregglobalavoidancecontrastanxietyappeardifferentiatedacrossspecificPsycInfoDatabaseRecordc2025APArightsreservedGeneticstyles:Evidence

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.