Commercial insurers' market power and hospital prices in Medicaid managed care.

Yang Wang, Jeffrey Marr, Jianhui Xu, Mark Katz Meiselbach
Author Information
  1. Yang Wang: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. ORCID
  2. Jeffrey Marr: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. ORCID
  3. Jianhui Xu: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. ORCID
  4. Mark Katz Meiselbach: Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationship between insurers' commercial market power and negotiated prices in Medicaid Managed Care (MMC) plans for hospital care.
DATA SOURCES: MMC prices from hospital-disclosed price transparency data as of July 2023 compiled by Turquoise Health, insurance enrollment information from the 2021 Clarivate InterStudy enrollment data.
STUDY DESIGN: Log-transformed linear regression with hospital and procedure fixed effects estimating the within-hospital MMC price variation as a function of insurers' commercial market share quartile and MMC market share for 15 common outpatient hospital services.
DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: A total of 39,049���MMC price samples measured at hospital-procedure-MMC insurer level are merged with county-insurer level market share data.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Around 25% of price variation in MMC plans are driven by within-hospital factors. Compared with MMC insurers from the lowest commercial market share quartile (<0.8%), those from the highest commercial market share quartile (>17%) are associated with negotiating 4.6% (95% confidence interval: [2.8%-6.4%], p���<���0.001) lower MMC prices for outpatient hospital care, including 3.6% (p���<���0.05) for medical/surgical procedures, 3.6% (p���<���0.01) for radiology, and 6.7% (p���<���0.001) for emergency department visits.
CONCLUSIONS: MMC insurers with substantial commercial market share negotiate lower MMC prices for multiple outpatient hospital services.

Keywords

References

  1. JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Dec 1;4(12):e234025 [PMID: 38100094]
  2. Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Aug;34(8):1289-95 [PMID: 26240241]
  3. Med Care Res Rev. 2024 Feb;81(1):78-84 [PMID: 37594219]
  4. Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Aug;42(8):1110-1118 [PMID: 37549324]
  5. Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb;60(1):e14407 [PMID: 39520269]
  6. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jan 1;36(1):141-148 [PMID: 28069857]
  7. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2344841 [PMID: 38015509]
  8. Q J Econ. 2019 Feb;134(1):51-107 [PMID: 32981974]
  9. Health Aff (Millwood). 2024 Jul;43(7):1032-1037 [PMID: 38950299]
  10. Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Jul;41(7):1029-1035 [PMID: 35787085]
  11. Am Econ Rev. 2019 Feb;109(2):473-522 [PMID: 30707004]
  12. Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 May;42(5):615-621 [PMID: 37126743]
  13. Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Sep 1;36(9):1539-1546 [PMID: 28874479]

Grants

  1. /Arnold Ventures

MeSH Term

United States
Managed Care Programs
Humans
Medicaid
Insurance Carriers
Economic Competition
Negotiating
Insurance, Health

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0MMCmarketcommercialhospitalsharepricespricep���<���0insurers'Medicaidcaredataquartileoutpatient6%powerplansDATAtransparencyinsuranceenrollmentwithin-hospitalvariationserviceslevelinsurers001lower3OBJECTIVE:examinerelationshipnegotiatedManagedCareSOURCES:hospital-disclosedJuly2023compiledTurquoiseHealthinformation2021ClarivateInterStudySTUDYDESIGN:Log-transformedlinearregressionprocedurefixedeffectsestimatingfunction15commonCOLLECTION/EXTRACTIONMETHODS:total39049���MMCsamplesmeasuredhospital-procedure-MMCinsurermergedcounty-insurerPRINCIPALFINDINGS:Around25%drivenfactorsComparedlowest<08%highest>17%associatednegotiating495%confidenceinterval:[28%-64%]including05medical/surgicalprocedures01radiology67%emergencydepartmentvisitsCONCLUSIONS:substantialnegotiatemultipleCommercialmanagedhealthhospitals

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)