A qualitative analysis of perceived risks and benefits of mosquito abatement and bite prevention strategies in Northeastern U.S. communities.

Emily M Mader, Nia Clements, ��ine Lehane, Jody Gangloff-Kaufmann, Scott Crans, Chris Horton, Amelia Greiner Safi
Author Information
  1. Emily M Mader: Department of Entomology, Northeast Regional Center for Excellence in Vector-Borne Diseases, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. ORCID
  2. Nia Clements: Department of Public and Ecosystem Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
  3. ��ine Lehane: Department of Entomology, Northeast Regional Center for Excellence in Vector-Borne Diseases, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. ORCID
  4. Jody Gangloff-Kaufmann: New York State Integrated Pest Management, Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Babylon, NY, USA. ORCID
  5. Scott Crans: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Mosquito Control Coordination, Trenton, NJ, USA.
  6. Chris Horton: Berkshire Mosquito Control Project, Massachusetts Department of Agricultural Resources, Pittsfield, MA, USA.
  7. Amelia Greiner Safi: Department of Public and Ecosystem Health, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. ORCID

Abstract

Mosquito-borne disease (MBD) incidence is increasing in the United States (U.S.), presenting an evolving health threat. Assessments of public perceptions have revealed limited awareness of MBDs among the U.S. population. Our team used focus groups to gain an in-depth understanding of risk perceptions regarding mosquito exposure and pesticide use, and benefit perceptions and motivators for bite prevention strategies. A total of 37 individuals participated in focus groups across 3 states: New Jersey (n���=���14), New York (n���=���15), and Massachusetts (n���=���8). Most participants were unfamiliar with public mosquito control services and felt they were not at high exposure risk to any MBDs. Overall, participants were supportive of investing public funds for mosquito surveillance. However, participants across all focus groups expressed concerns over ecosystem health and long-term consequences of pesticide use for mosquito control. Participants in every focus group referenced a risk assessment that weighed the risk of MBD exposure against the use of chemical control: once participants perceived MBDs as negatively impacting human and/or animal health in their area, sentiment swung largely to supporting the use of pesticides. In the absence of an obvious MBD threat, participants preferred nonchemical control interventions. Participants felt communication from mosquito control agencies should be accessible, disseminated across multiple venues, and should include instructions for the public during spray events, resources for individual bite prevention, and information on control products used. Our research results can inform the development of improved, evidence-based MBD outreach and educational resources that are acceptable, actionable, and relevant to Northeast communities.

Keywords

References

  1. Pathogens. 2021 Nov 30;10(12): [PMID: 34959517]
  2. Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 07;10:919780 [PMID: 36419988]
  3. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2024 May 09;73(18):417-419 [PMID: 38722800]
  4. Pathog Glob Health. 2021 Feb;115(1):40-52 [PMID: 33161883]
  5. Fam Pract. 2022 Jul 19;39(4):785-789 [PMID: 34849754]
  6. Health Educ Q. 1988 Summer;15(2):175-83 [PMID: 3378902]
  7. Bioscience. 2013 Mar 1;63(3):164-175 [PMID: 25143635]
  8. Perspect Public Health. 2020 Jul;140(4):214-221 [PMID: 31755813]
  9. Health Educ Q. 1984 Spring;11(1):1-47 [PMID: 6392204]
  10. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2018 Mar;98(3):845-848 [PMID: 29405105]
  11. Vaccine. 2023 Mar 17;41(12):1994-2002 [PMID: 36803894]
  12. Indian J Psychol Med. 2020 Aug 27;42(5):478-481 [PMID: 33414597]
  13. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016 Oct 5;95(4):945-953 [PMID: 27527634]
  14. BMC Public Health. 2007 Jun 11;7:104 [PMID: 17561997]
  15. Health Promot Pract. 2005 Oct;6(4):482-90 [PMID: 16210691]
  16. J Med Entomol. 2022 Mar 16;59(2):401-411 [PMID: 35064260]
  17. Health Educ Behav. 2000 Oct;27(5):591-615 [PMID: 11009129]
  18. J Med Entomol. 2018 Jun 28;55(4):955-963 [PMID: 29471405]
  19. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2023 Apr 28;72(17):452-457 [PMID: 37104168]
  20. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2017 Dec;33(4):331-339 [PMID: 29369034]
  21. Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 08;11:1239874 [PMID: 38145086]
  22. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 May;8(5):1358-67 [PMID: 21655124]
  23. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 25;9(9):e108504 [PMID: 25255027]
  24. Risk Anal. 2018 Dec;38(12):2546-2560 [PMID: 29738625]
  25. PeerJ. 2022 Dec 2;10:e14188 [PMID: 36518270]
  26. J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Mar;59(3):e17-e19 [PMID: 28267109]
  27. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 23;19(1):987 [PMID: 31337359]
  28. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2003 Winter;3(4):157-73 [PMID: 14733669]
  29. Ecohealth. 2013 Mar;10(1):36-47 [PMID: 23377982]
  30. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2019 Feb;100(2):242-245 [PMID: 30499427]
  31. Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Apr;19(2):34-5 [PMID: 26872777]
  32. Psychol Bull. 2014 Mar;140(2):511-43 [PMID: 23731175]
  33. SAGE Open Med. 2019 Jan 02;7:2050312118822927 [PMID: 30637106]
  34. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022 Feb;28(2):425-428 [PMID: 35076377]
  35. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Jan 17;69(2):50-51 [PMID: 31945032]
  36. Ecohealth. 2009 Mar;6(1):42-51 [PMID: 19452223]
  37. Health Educ Behav. 2012 Aug;39(4):455-73 [PMID: 22002250]
  38. JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):223-224 [PMID: 33393964]
  39. J Community Health. 2024 Feb;49(1):78-85 [PMID: 37507524]
  40. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Sep;19(9):e302-e312 [PMID: 31227327]
  41. BMC Public Health. 2023 Sep 5;23(1):1730 [PMID: 37670248]

Grants

  1. U01 CK000509/NCEZID CDC HHS
  2. 2023-01/American Mosquito Control Association Research
  3. U01CK000509/CDC HHS

MeSH Term

Mosquito Control
Humans
Animals
Insect Bites and Stings
Risk Assessment
Focus Groups
Female
Adult
Male
Middle Aged
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Culicidae
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mosquitocontrolriskparticipantsMBDpublicfocususeUShealthperceptionsMBDsgroupsexposurebitepreventionacrossdiseasethreatusedpesticidestrategiesNewfeltParticipantsassessmentperceivedcommunicationresourcescommunitiesMosquito-borneincidenceincreasingUnitedStatespresentingevolvingAssessmentsrevealedlimitedawarenessamongpopulationteamgainin-depthunderstandingregardingbenefitmotivatorstotal37individualsparticipated3states:Jerseyn���=���14Yorkn���=���15Massachusettsn���=���8unfamiliarserviceshighOverallsupportiveinvestingfundssurveillanceHoweverexpressedconcernsecosystemlong-termconsequenceseverygroupreferencedweighedchemicalcontrol:negativelyimpactinghumanand/oranimalareasentimentswunglargelysupportingpesticidesabsenceobviouspreferrednonchemicalinterventionsagenciesaccessibledisseminatedmultiplevenuesincludeinstructionssprayeventsindividualinformationproductsresearchresultscaninformdevelopmentimprovedevidence-basedoutreacheducationalacceptableactionablerelevantNortheastqualitativeanalysisrisksbenefitsabatementNortheasternacceptabilitymosquito-borne

Similar Articles

Cited By (1)