The Effect of Light on Wellbeing: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

A Landvreugd, M G Nivard, M Bartels
Author Information
  1. A Landvreugd: Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van Der Boechorstraat 7-9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ORCID
  2. M G Nivard: Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van Der Boechorstraat 7-9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  3. M Bartels: Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van Der Boechorstraat 7-9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Due to the dominant presence of studies and reviews exploring the impact of light on physical and mental illness, studies specifically investigating the effect of light on wellbeing are often overshadowed. The aim of this review is to give an overview of specifically these studies conducted on light and wellbeing, and to summarize the reported effects. After a literature search in , and , 74 studies were found eligible to be included in this systematic review, i.e. they included surveys assessing wellbeing, happiness, life satisfaction, positive affect, or quality of life. Of these 74 studies, 30 were included in the meta-analysis and assessed for their risk of bias. The meta-analysis showed a pooled effect size of 0.46 (���=���0.29-0.62), indicating that light has a small-to-moderate positive effect on wellbeing. After removing outliers and studies with a high risk of bias, the sensitivity analysis showed the pooled effect size to be robust (0.53, ���=���0.35-0.72). Although the sensitivity analysis indicated a robust effect, the results might still be biased due to the relatively small sample sizes, risk of bias in the designs (due to e.g. difficulties handling confounders and the reporting of the outcomes), and publication bias. We encourage future studies to replicate these positive results in larger samples, and to give extensive details about the light design and statistical outcomes, to increase the number of studies that can be included in these types of systematic reviews.
Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10902-024-00838-4.

Keywords

References

  1. Front Physiol. 2018 Nov 05;9:1530 [PMID: 30455647]
  2. J Neurosci Methods. 2010 Feb 15;186(2):165-70 [PMID: 19932714]
  3. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014 Jul;15(7):443-54 [PMID: 24917305]
  4. Chronobiol Int. 2009 Jul;26(5):854-66 [PMID: 19637047]
  5. Chronobiol Int. 2015;32(8):1049-60 [PMID: 26181467]
  6. Sleep Med Rev. 2016 Oct;29:52-62 [PMID: 26606319]
  7. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2018 Sep;34(5):288-297 [PMID: 29855075]
  8. Psychosom Med. 2022 Jan 1;84(1):123-130 [PMID: 34581703]
  9. J Affect Disord. 2021 Dec 1;295:347-352 [PMID: 34488088]
  10. Res Synth Methods. 2012 Sep;3(3):214-23 [PMID: 26062164]
  11. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Feb 24;106(8):2490-4 [PMID: 19202078]
  12. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2012;65(11):2271-9 [PMID: 22853650]
  13. JAMA Neurol. 2014 Apr;71(4):463-9 [PMID: 24566763]
  14. Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1539-58 [PMID: 12111919]
  15. Nature. 2012 Nov 22;491(7425):594-8 [PMID: 23151476]
  16. J Biol Rhythms. 2017 Aug;32(4):359-368 [PMID: 28631524]
  17. Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 07;18(3):91-93 [PMID: 30191186]
  18. Psychiatry Res. 1993 Aug;48(2):153-78 [PMID: 8416024]
  19. BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71 [PMID: 33782057]
  20. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2018;46(5-6):371-384 [PMID: 30537760]
  21. Neurology. 2015 Jul 14;85(2):162-8 [PMID: 26085603]
  22. PLoS One. 2016 Nov 9;11(11):e0165331 [PMID: 27829040]
  23. Res Synth Methods. 2010 Apr;1(2):112-25 [PMID: 26061377]
  24. Chronobiol Int. 2014 Nov;31(9):976-82 [PMID: 25025617]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Mar 8;113(10):E1402-11 [PMID: 26858430]
  26. Front Psychol. 2020 Jul 14;11:1396 [PMID: 32760311]
  27. Clocks Sleep. 2020 Dec 14;2(4):557-576 [PMID: 33327499]
  28. J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5 [PMID: 16367493]
  29. Depress Res Treat. 2011;2011:543906 [PMID: 21747994]
  30. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Nov;92(11):1439-44 [PMID: 18757473]
  31. Ann Neurol. 2011 Nov;70(5):722-32 [PMID: 22162057]
  32. Diabetes. 2014 Jun;63(6):1860-9 [PMID: 24458353]
  33. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 2;111(48):17302-7 [PMID: 25404342]
  34. BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919 [PMID: 27733354]
  35. JAMA Neurol. 2020 Oct 1;77(10):1270-1278 [PMID: 32539075]
  36. Psychother Psychosom. 2020;89(1):17-24 [PMID: 31574513]
  37. PLoS Med. 2011 Dec;8(12):e1001141 [PMID: 22162955]
  38. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 29;9(7):e102827 [PMID: 25072880]
  39. Somnologie (Berl). 2019 Sep;23(3):147-156 [PMID: 31534436]
  40. BMJ. 1997 Sep 13;315(7109):629-34 [PMID: 9310563]
  41. BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898 [PMID: 31462531]
  42. Sleep. 2023 Mar 9;46(3): [PMID: 35729737]
  43. N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 11;384(6):550-561 [PMID: 33567194]
  44. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2015 Dec;38(4):645-65 [PMID: 26600101]
  45. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020 Apr;74(4):247-256 [PMID: 31917880]
  46. Biosci Trends. 2016 Feb;10(1):34-41 [PMID: 26853813]
  47. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 07;17(23): [PMID: 33297521]
  48. J Sleep Res. 2022 Apr;31(2):e13471 [PMID: 34549481]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0studieslighteffectwellbeingincludedbiaslifepositiveriskreviewsspecificallyreviewgive74systematicemeta-analysisshowedpooledsize0���=���0sensitivityanalysisrobustresultsdueoutcomesLightMeta-analysisDuedominantpresenceexploringimpactphysicalmentalillnessinvestigatingoftenovershadowedaimoverviewconductedsummarizereportedeffectsliteraturesearchfoundeligibleisurveysassessinghappinesssatisfactionaffectquality30assessed4629-062indicatingsmall-to-moderateremovingoutliershigh5335-072AlthoughindicatedmightstillbiasedrelativelysmallsamplesizesdesignsgdifficultieshandlingconfoundersreportingpublicationencouragefuturereplicatelargersamplesextensivedetailsdesignstatisticalincreasenumbercantypesSupplementaryInformation:onlineversioncontainssupplementarymaterialavailable101007/s10902-024-00838-4EffectWellbeing:SystematicReviewHappinessQualityWellbeing

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.