Utilization of Artificial Intelligence to Improve Equitable Healthcare Access for Breast Implant Patients.

Louisa B Ragsdale, Aurora M Kareh, Rohun Gupta, Peter K Firouzbakht, Christina M Plikaitis, Katherine A Rodby
Author Information

Abstract

Recently, mandated FDA patient decision checklists were developed with the goal of improving the informed decision-making process for patients considering breast implants. However, these checklists are written at reading levels far higher than recommended by the National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association. This study aims to improve the accessibility, and therefore, the utility of the mandated FDA patient literature for the average breast implant patient using the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI). patient decision checklists were obtained from the 3 most utilized breast implant manufacturers in the United States-Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra. A novel patient decision checklist was synthesized by AI, written at the sixth grade reading level, using these checklists as source material. The AI-assisted checklist was edited by plastic surgeons for both formatting and content. The overall readability of Allergan, Mentor, and Sientra patient checklists correlated with the college reading level. These documents were of a statistically significantly higher reading level than the AI-assisted checklist, which was written at the recommended sixth grade level. Text composition analysis similarly demonstrated substantial differences between the AI-assisted and FDA-mandated literature. The currently mandated breast implant patient checklists are written at a college reading level and are inaccessible to the average patient. The authors propose a new patient decision checklist, generated with the assistance of AI, to improve healthcare access within plastic surgery. This simplified material can be used as an adjunct to the current checklists to improve shared decision making.

References

  1. Urol Pract. 2024 Jan;11(1):87-94 [PMID: 37914380]
  2. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2015 Jun;29(2):133-9 [PMID: 26095483]
  3. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Mar-Apr 01;40(2):212-216 [PMID: 37972974]
  4. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 May;117(5):1160-1166 [PMID: 21508756]
  5. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jan;90(1):199-204 [PMID: 18171975]
  6. Ann Plast Surg. 2021 Aug 1;87(2):123-125 [PMID: 33346559]
  7. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992 Jan-Feb;19(1):51-5 [PMID: 1538988]
  8. Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Jul 15;43(8):NP670-NP672 [PMID: 37154801]
  9. Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Jun 14;43(7):NP591-NP592 [PMID: 36905162]
  10. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2023 May;80:145-147 [PMID: 37023599]
  11. Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Aug 17;43(9):NP726-NP727 [PMID: 37227006]
  12. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Apr;125(4):1271-1278 [PMID: 20072085]
  13. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1573-1579 [PMID: 26017593]
  14. J Hand Surg Am. 2009 Sep;34(7):1308-15 [PMID: 19596175]
  15. Aesthet Surg J. 2023 Jul 15;43(8):NP663-NP665 [PMID: 37082940]
  16. Patient Educ Couns. 2016 Sep;99(9):1511-8 [PMID: 27378079]
  17. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Jul 19;155(2):97-107 [PMID: 21768583]
  18. Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Dec 1;91(6):651-655 [PMID: 37856237]
  19. Trauma Mon. 2016 Feb 06;21(1):e20141 [PMID: 27218045]
  20. Pediatrics. 1994 Mar;93(3):460-8 [PMID: 8115206]
  21. Ann Plast Surg. 2023 Oct 1;91(4):409-412 [PMID: 37713147]
  22. Surgery. 2016 Feb;159(2):580-90 [PMID: 26444326]
  23. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Feb;281(2):985-993 [PMID: 37917165]
  24. J Cancer Educ. 1990;5(1):55-61 [PMID: 2400672]
  25. Ann Plast Surg. 2020 Apr;84(4):346-350 [PMID: 31977528]
  26. Cancer. 2018 Feb 15;124(4):769-774 [PMID: 29178322]
  27. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Oct 26;11(10):e5305 [PMID: 37900984]
  28. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Dec;134(6):1405-1414 [PMID: 25415103]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientchecklistsdecisionreadinglevelbreastwrittenchecklistmandatedimproveimplantAIAI-assistedFDAhigherrecommendedliteratureaverageusingassistanceMentorSientrasixthgradematerialplasticcollegeRecentlydevelopedgoalimprovinginformeddecision-makingprocesspatientsconsideringimplantsHoweverlevelsfarNationalInstitutesHealthAmericanMedicalAssociationstudyaimsaccessibilitythereforeutilityartificialintelligencePatientobtained3utilizedmanufacturersUnitedStates-AllergannovelsynthesizedsourceeditedsurgeonsformattingcontentoverallreadabilityAllergancorrelateddocumentsstatisticallysignificantlyTextcompositionanalysissimilarlydemonstratedsubstantialdifferencesFDA-mandatedcurrentlyinaccessibleauthorsproposenewgeneratedhealthcareaccesswithinsurgerysimplifiedcanusedadjunctcurrentsharedmakingUtilizationArtificialIntelligenceImproveEquitableHealthcareAccessBreastImplantPatients

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.