Comparative effectiveness of self-learning and instructor-assisted pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training: A prospective randomized study.

Hye Ji Park, Daun Choi, Hoyoen Shim, Choung Ah Lee
Author Information
  1. Hye Ji Park: Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Republic of Korea.
  2. Daun Choi: Hallym Dongtan Simulation Center, 160, Samsung 1-ro, Hwaseong-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.
  3. Hoyoen Shim: Nursing Department, Hallym University College of Medicine, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Republic of Korea.
  4. Choung Ah Lee: Department of Emergency Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Republic of Korea. Electronic address: cuccum@hanmail.net.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Unlike that for adults, training for cardiopulmonary resuscitation of infant and child is scarce, and warrants efforts for greater accessibility. Effective self-learning could expand training accessibility and facilitate the development of effective infant and child cardiopulmonary resuscitation training methods.
AIM: This study was conducted to develop a pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation self-learning training program, implement nurse training, and evaluate training effectiveness by comparing trainees' achievement of self-efficacy in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation, with or without instructor assistance.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled study.
SETTINGS: General hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: Nurses working in a general hospital.
METHODS: Participants were randomly and sequentially assigned to either an instructor-assisted or a self-learning group and completed a pre-training survey, pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training, post-training survey and test, and a 1-year follow-up test. Pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training was divided into infant and child cardiopulmonary resuscitation training.
RESULTS: Among the 97 participants, instructor-assisted and self-learning groups trained in pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation showed no significant difference in correct chest compressions, ventilation performance, and self-efficacy at the post-training assessment. However compared to the pre-training assessment, these parameters increased significantly in both groups at the post-training assessment (self-efficacy: infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation: pre-training 15.48, post-training: 17.25 vs pre-training 19.74, post-training 20.05; child cardiopulmonary resuscitation: pre-training 15.78, post-training 17.90 vs pre-training 19.48, post-training 20.55; both p < 0.001), respectively. In the self-learning group, at the 1-year follow-up, the rate of correct infant resuscitation compression decreased significantly from 89 (immediate post-training score) to 76 (p = 0.07), without significant intergroup difference. Regarding the time of measurement, although the main effect was significant (p < 0.001), the interaction effect of instructor-assisted training and time of measurement on pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation self-efficacy was not.
CONCLUSION: Pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training did not differ significantly with training modality and improved self-efficacy, which changed significantly over time. These results aid the design of effective self-learning training programs for pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation training.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Humans
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Prospective Studies
Female
Male
Self Efficacy
Adult
Infant
Clinical Competence
Surveys and Questionnaires
Child
Child, Preschool
Educational Measurement

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trainingcardiopulmonaryresuscitationself-learningpediatricpost-trainingpre-traininginfantself-efficacychildinstructor-assistedsignificantlyCPRstudyPediatricsignificantassessmenttimeaccessibilityeffectiveeffectivenesswithoutrandomizedhospitalgroupsurveytest1-yearfollow-upgroupsdifferencecorrectperformanceresuscitation:154817vs1920p < 0001measurementeffectBACKGROUND:UnlikeadultsscarcewarrantseffortsgreaterEffectiveexpandfacilitatedevelopmentmethodsAIM:conducteddevelopprogramimplementnurseevaluatecomparingtrainees'achievementinstructorassistanceDESIGN:ProspectivecontrolledSETTINGS:GeneralPARTICIPANTS:NursesworkinggeneralMETHODS:ParticipantsrandomlysequentiallyassignedeithercompleteddividedRESULTS:Among97participantstrainedshowedchestcompressionsventilationHowevercomparedparametersincreasedself-efficacy:post-training:257405789055respectivelyratecompressiondecreased89immediatescore76p = 007intergroupRegardingalthoughmaininteractionnotCONCLUSION:differmodalityimprovedchangedresultsaiddesignprogramsComparativetraining:prospectiveSelf-learning

Similar Articles

Cited By