Embedded Ethics in Practice: A Toolbox for Integrating the Analysis of Ethical and Social Issues into Healthcare AI Research.

Theresa Willem, Marie-Christine Fritzsche, Bettina M Zimmermann, Anna Sierawska, Svenja Breuer, Maximilian Braun, Anja K Ruess, Marieke Bak, Franziska B Sch��nweitz, Lukas J Meier, Amelia Fiske, Daniel Tigard, Ruth M��ller, Stuart McLennan, Alena Buyx
Author Information
  1. Theresa Willem: Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Department of Preclinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Stra��e 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. theresa.willem@tum.de. ORCID
  2. Marie-Christine Fritzsche: Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Department of Preclinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Stra��e 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  3. Bettina M Zimmermann: Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Department of Preclinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Stra��e 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  4. Anna Sierawska: Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Department of Preclinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Stra��e 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  5. Svenja Breuer: Department of Science, Technology and Society (STS), School of Social Science and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  6. Maximilian Braun: Department of Science, Technology and Society (STS), School of Social Science and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  7. Anja K Ruess: Department of Science, Technology and Society (STS), School of Social Science and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  8. Marieke Bak: Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Department of Preclinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Stra��e 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  9. Franziska B Sch��nweitz: Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Department of Preclinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Stra��e 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  10. Lukas J Meier: Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Department of Preclinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Stra��e 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  11. Amelia Fiske: Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Department of Preclinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Stra��e 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  12. Daniel Tigard: Department of Philosophy, University of San Diego, San Diego, USA.
  13. Ruth M��ller: Department of Science, Technology and Society (STS), School of Social Science and Technology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  14. Stuart McLennan: Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Department of Preclinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Stra��e 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
  15. Alena Buyx: Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, Department of Preclinical Medicine, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Ismaninger Stra��e 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.

Abstract

Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into critical domains such as healthcare holds immense promise. Nevertheless, significant challenges must be addressed to avoid harm, promote the well-being of individuals and societies, and ensure ethically sound and socially just technology development. Innovative approaches like Embedded Ethics, which refers to integrating ethics and social science into technology development based on interdisciplinary collaboration, are emerging to address issues of bias, transparency, misrepresentation, and more. This paper aims to develop this approach further to enable future projects to effectively deploy it. Based on the practical experience of using ethics and social science methodology in interdisciplinary AI-related healthcare consortia, this paper presents several methods that have proven helpful for embedding ethical and social science analysis and inquiry. They include (1) stakeholder analyses, (2) literature reviews, (3) ethnographic approaches, (4) peer-to-peer interviews, (5) focus groups, (6) interviews with affected groups and external stakeholders, (7) bias analyses, (8) workshops, and (9) interdisciplinary results dissemination. We believe that applying Embedded Ethics offers a pathway to stimulate reflexivity, proactively anticipate social and ethical concerns, and foster interdisciplinary inquiry into such concerns at every stage of technology development. This approach can help shape responsible, inclusive, and ethically aware technology innovation in healthcare and beyond.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Bioeth. 2022 Jul;22(7):4-20 [PMID: 35293841]
  2. Science. 2021 Oct 29;374(6567):542 [PMID: 34709921]
  3. Nature. 2017 Feb 2;542(7639):115-118 [PMID: 28117445]
  4. Minerva. 2016;54:175-200 [PMID: 27340295]
  5. J Med Philos. 2014 Feb;39(1):89-97 [PMID: 24334289]
  6. Nature. 2015 Sep 17;525(7569):291 [PMID: 26381948]
  7. Philos Technol. 2021;34(2):215-222 [PMID: 34104628]
  8. Heliyon. 2024 Jun 24;10(13):e31723 [PMID: 39040296]
  9. J Radiol Nurs. 2023 Dec;42(4):493-495 [PMID: 39830782]
  10. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Aug;36(8):1201-1213 [PMID: 35366351]
  11. Sci Eng Ethics. 2023 May 26;29(3):21 [PMID: 37237246]
  12. Am J Bioeth. 2020 Nov;20(11):20-22 [PMID: 33103983]
  13. Invest Radiol. 2020 Sep;55(9):619-627 [PMID: 32776769]
  14. Nat Neurosci. 2014 Nov;17(11):1440-1 [PMID: 25349909]
  15. BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Jan 26;23(1):6 [PMID: 35081955]
  16. Bioethics. 2024 Mar;38(3):177-186 [PMID: 38009318]
  17. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Apr 01;30(3):161-168 [PMID: 29394354]
  18. Cell Genom. 2022 Jul 13;2(7): [PMID: 35935917]
  19. PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Jun 22;2(6):e0000278 [PMID: 37347721]
  20. BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Sep 30;15:71 [PMID: 25267434]
  21. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 06;9:795957 [PMID: 35872767]
  22. Nanoethics. 2011 Aug;5(2):129-141 [PMID: 21957435]
  23. Arch Surg. 2000 Jan;135(1):39-45 [PMID: 10636345]
  24. J Med Ethics. 2012 Feb;38(2):121-6 [PMID: 22080465]
  25. Health Policy. 2020 Oct;124(10):1083-1099 [PMID: 32829927]
  26. Am J Bioeth. 2020 Nov;20(11):7-17 [PMID: 33103967]
  27. Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 31;13:1161118 [PMID: 37064106]
  28. Health Policy Plan. 2000 Sep;15(3):338-45 [PMID: 11012410]
  29. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Sep;36(9):1660-1668 [PMID: 35490413]
  30. Sci Technol Human Values. 2018 May;43(3):487-517 [PMID: 29657348]
  31. BMC Med. 2016 Oct 3;14(1):152 [PMID: 27716264]
  32. EBioMedicine. 2024 Mar;101:105002 [PMID: 38335791]
  33. Bioethics. 2024 Mar;38(3):241-251 [PMID: 37366555]
  34. PLoS Med. 2018 Nov 6;15(11):e1002689 [PMID: 30399149]
  35. J Med Ethics. 2010 Apr;36(4):207-10 [PMID: 20338930]
  36. Am J Bioeth. 2020 Nov;20(11):32-35 [PMID: 33103978]
  37. Hastings Cent Rep. 2021 Sep;51(5):6-7 [PMID: 34159617]

MeSH Term

Humans
Artificial Intelligence
Social Sciences
Delivery of Health Care
Stakeholder Participation
Ethics, Research
Anthropology, Cultural
Focus Groups
Bias

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0technologyEthicssocialscienceinterdisciplinaryAIhealthcaredevelopmentEmbeddedIntegratingethicallyapproachesethicsbiaspaperapproachethicalinquiryanalysesinterviewsgroupsconcernsSocialartificialintelligencecriticaldomainsholdsimmensepromiseNeverthelesssignificantchallengesmustaddressedavoidharmpromotewell-beingindividualssocietiesensuresoundsociallyjustInnovativelikerefersintegratingbasedcollaborationemergingaddressissuestransparencymisrepresentationaimsdevelopfurther toenablefutureprojectseffectivelydeployBasedpracticalexperienceusingmethodologyAI-relatedconsortiapresentsseveralmethodsprovenhelpfulembeddinganalysisinclude1stakeholder2literaturereviews3ethnographic4peer-to-peer5focus6affectedexternalstakeholders78workshops9resultsdisseminationbelieveapplyingofferspathwaystimulatereflexivityproactivelyanticipatefostereverystagecanhelpshaperesponsibleinclusiveawareinnovationbeyondPractice:ToolboxAnalysisEthicalIssuesHealthcareResearchHealthInterdisciplinarycollaborationsTechnology

Similar Articles

Cited By