Genetic diversity of the recovered populations of (Nematoda: Criconematidae) from orchards in Fars province, Southern Iran.

Ali Asghar Dehghan, Reza Ghaderi, Akbar Karegar, Abbas Mokaram Hesar
Author Information
  1. Ali Asghar Dehghan: Department of Plant Protection, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, 71441-65186, Shiraz, Iran.
  2. Reza Ghaderi: Department of Plant Protection, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, 71441-65186, Shiraz, Iran. ORCID
  3. Akbar Karegar: Department of Plant Protection, School of Agriculture, Shiraz University, 71441-65186, Shiraz, Iran. ORCID
  4. Abbas Mokaram Hesar: Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Afagh Higher Education Institute, Urmia 5756151818, Iran. ORCID

Abstract

In this survey, 14 populations of were collected from the rhizosphere of eight fruit and nut trees in Fars province, Southern Iran. The phylogenetic relationships of these populations with other representatives of the species were investigated using sequences of cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 mitochondrial gene () and D2-D3 expansion fragments of 28S rDNA. Phylogenetic studies indicated a close relationship of the currently sequenced populations with known haplotype groups (HG) in the tree and revealed two separate lineages in the 28S rDNA tree. Moreover, the genetic diversity of the populations was analyzed using seven ISSR primers as molecular markers. The estimated genetic diversity among populations regarding associated trees and geographic regions were low values of 3.3% and 5.9%, respectively, indicating high gene flow among the recovered nematode populations. On the other hand, the estimated fixation index (F) was higher for associated plants than for geographic regions (0.611 0.504) indicating that plant-based population segregation better explains genetic diversity in this species. This work expands our knowledge of the genetic structure of this cosmopolitan species of plant-parasitic nematodes.

Keywords

References

  1. Bioinformatics. 2012 Oct 1;28(19):2537-9 [PMID: 22820204]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Dec;70(12):3321-3 [PMID: 4519626]
  3. Genetics. 1978 Jul;89(3):583-90 [PMID: 17248844]
  4. Theor Appl Genet. 1993 Sep;86(8):927-34 [PMID: 24193999]
  5. J Nematol. 2020;52:1-13 [PMID: 32329291]
  6. J Nematol. 2012 Dec;44(4):399-426 [PMID: 23482878]
  7. J Nematol. 2004 Sep;36(3):193-201 [PMID: 19262807]
  8. Sci Rep. 2018 Sep 14;8(1):13816 [PMID: 30217984]
  9. Ecol Evol. 2020 Jun 01;10(12):5391-5401 [PMID: 32607161]
  10. Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4 [PMID: 12912839]
  11. Evolution. 1989 Nov;43(7):1349-1368 [PMID: 28564250]
  12. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009 Nov;17(11):1495-500 [PMID: 19367317]
  13. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876-82 [PMID: 9396791]
  14. Syst Parasitol. 2000 Jul;46(3):191-201 [PMID: 10845651]
  15. J Nematol. 1988 Jan;20(1):40-6 [PMID: 19290183]
  16. J Nematol. 1999 Dec;31(4S):624-34 [PMID: 19270927]
  17. J Nematol. 1987 Jul;19(3):296-303 [PMID: 19290147]
  18. Zootaxa. 2014 Jul 03;3827(2):101-46 [PMID: 25081151]
  19. Cancer Res. 1967 Feb;27(2):209-20 [PMID: 6018555]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0populationsdiversitygeneticspeciestreesFarsprovinceSouthernIranusinggene28SrDNAhaplotypetreeISSRestimatedamongassociatedgeographicregionsindicatingrecoverednematode0Geneticsurvey14collectedrhizosphereeightfruitnutphylogeneticrelationshipsrepresentativesinvestigatedsequencescytochromecoxidasesubunit1mitochondrialD2-D3expansionfragmentsPhylogeneticstudiesindicatedcloserelationshipcurrentlysequencedknowngroupsHGrevealedtwoseparatelineagesMoreoveranalyzedsevenprimersmolecularmarkersregardinglowvalues33%59%respectivelyhighflowhandfixationindexFhigherplants611504plant-basedpopulationsegregationbetterexplainsworkexpandsknowledgestructurecosmopolitanplant-parasiticnematodesNematoda:Criconematidaeorchardsmorphometricsphylogenyring

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.