Dermoscopy of Scabies: Utility of Polarised and Ultraviolet-Induced Fluorescence Examination in Fair and Dark Skin.

Enzo Errichetti, Noemi Plozner, Nkechi A Enechukwu, Yasmeen J Bhat, Pawe�� Pietkiewicz, Natalia Salwowska, Iris Zalaudek, Giuseppe Stinco
Author Information
  1. Enzo Errichetti: Department of Medical Area, Institute of Dermatology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy. ORCID
  2. Noemi Plozner: Department of Medical Area, Institute of Dermatology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
  3. Nkechi A Enechukwu: Department of Internal Medicine, Nnamdi Azikiwe University/Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital, Nnewi, Nigeria.
  4. Yasmeen J Bhat: Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, Government Medical College, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
  5. Pawe�� Pietkiewicz: Independent Researcher, Pozna��, Poland.
  6. Natalia Salwowska: Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
  7. Iris Zalaudek: Department of Dermatology, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
  8. Giuseppe Stinco: Department of Medical Area, Institute of Dermatology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ultraviolet-based dermoscopy may support the recognition of scabies, yet neither accuracy analyses nor data on skin of colour are available. The aim of this multicentric observational retrospective was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of polarised and ultraviolet-induced fluorescence (UVF) dermoscopic examination in both fair and dark skin, also assessing possible differences according to the skin tone.
METHODS: Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of scabies were eligible. All the images were randomly evaluated by two independent experienced investigators to identify scabietic findings reported in the literature. Interobserver agreement was evaluated for both polarised and UVF dermoscopic pictures through Cohen's kappa coefficient, while Fisher's exact test with p-value set at 0.05 was used for comparative analyses between the two settings.
RESULTS: A total of 97 lesions from 43 patients (21 with fair skin and 22 with dark skin) were included. The comparative analysis highlighted a superiority of UVF dermoscopy to detect the burrow (p���=���0.003) and scabietic eggs (p���=���0.012) in skin of colour, while polarised dermoscopy was more accurate to show the mite in fair skin (p���=���0.042). Additionally, a general higher accuracy of both settings in light phototypes was also found, with a higher prevalence (p���<���0.05) of typical scabietic findings (i.e., serpiginous white tract, 'triangle' sign and grey-brown outlines of the burrow for polarised dermoscopy and green dot for UVF dermoscopy) compared to dark skin. Kappa values were 0.87 and 0.83 for polarised and UVF-dermoscopy, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: UVF dermoscopy improves the recognition of scabies, though it should be considered complimentary to polarised light dermoscopic examination to increase diagnostic performance.

Keywords

References

  1. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Dec 08;7(12): [PMID: 36548678]
  2. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Feb;14(2):361-390 [PMID: 38358617]
  3. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat. 2018 Jun;27(2):75-78 [PMID: 29945263]
  4. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023 Oct 01;13(4 S1): [PMID: 37874989]
  5. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2024 Jan 01;14(1): [PMID: 38364437]
  6. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2025 Jan;39(1):97-108 [PMID: 38288676]
  7. Cureus. 2023 Jan 30;15(1):e34390 [PMID: 36874720]
  8. Int J Dermatol. 2022 Apr;61(4):461-471 [PMID: 34216025]
  9. Exp Dermatol. 2023 Nov;32(11):1996-1999 [PMID: 37702268]
  10. Eur J Dermatol. 2020 Dec 1;30(6):688-698 [PMID: 33319764]

MeSH Term

Humans
Dermoscopy
Scabies
Female
Male
Ultraviolet Rays
Retrospective Studies
Adult
Middle Aged
Skin Pigmentation
Fluorescence
Aged
Young Adult
Adolescent

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0skindermoscopypolarisedUVFscabiesaccuracycolourdermoscopicfairdarkdiagnosisscabietic0p���=���0recognitionanalysesdiagnosticexaminationalsopatientsevaluatedtwofindings05comparativesettingsburrowhigherlightINTRODUCTION:Ultraviolet-basedmaysupportyetneitherdataavailableaimmulticentricobservationalretrospectiveinvestigateultraviolet-inducedfluorescenceassessingpossibledifferencesaccordingtoneMETHODS:ConsecutiveeligibleimagesrandomlyindependentexperiencedinvestigatorsidentifyreportedliteratureInterobserveragreementpicturesCohen'skappacoefficientFisher'sexacttestp-valuesetusedRESULTS:total97lesions432122includedanalysishighlightedsuperioritydetect003eggs012accurateshowmite042Additionallygeneralphototypesfoundprevalencep���<���0typicalieserpiginouswhitetract'triangle'signgrey-brownoutlinesgreendotcomparedKappavalues8783UVF-dermoscopyrespectivelyCONCLUSIONS:improvesthoughconsideredcomplimentaryincreaseperformanceDermoscopyScabies:UtilityPolarisedUltraviolet-InducedFluorescenceExaminationFairDarkSkinUVdifferential

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.