Barriers and enablers to measuring resting metabolic rate in the high-performance sporting system: A qualitative exploratory study.

Megan A Kuikman, Alannah Ka McKay, Helen Brown, Nicole Townsend, Rachel McCormick, Aimee Morabito, Nikolay Pichshev, Gary Slater, Louise M Burke
Author Information
  1. Megan A Kuikman: Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  2. Alannah Ka McKay: Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  3. Helen Brown: School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  4. Nicole Townsend: Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
  5. Rachel McCormick: Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
  6. Aimee Morabito: Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
  7. Nikolay Pichshev: Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  8. Gary Slater: Australian Institute of Sport, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
  9. Louise M Burke: Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Abstract

Measurements of resting metabolic rate (RMR) may be undertaken for dietary planning purposes or to assess for low energy availability (LEA). This study investigated barriers and enablers to measuring RMR in real-world, high-performance sport environments. Twelve interviews were conducted with technicians (���=���6 dietitians, ���=���6 physiologists) employed across six National Institute Networks, two National Sporting Organisations and one professional sporting code. RMR was predominantly measured to screen for LEA with measurements only occurring in a few instances for dietary planning purposes. Data was thematically analysed with six main themes identified. Barriers included lack of confidence in measuring RMR, burden of measurement on athlete and technician, confusion over measurement responsibility, and scepticism in RMR measurements as an indicator of LEA. Subthemes that contributed to scepticism included: the RMR thresholds used to indicate LEA, unanswered research questions, and measurement errors introduced by athlete presentation, testing equipment and/or environment. Enablers to use of RMR measurements included perceived value of RMR measurements as a 'piece of the puzzle' when assessing for LEA and its use as a longitudinal measure. Best practice guidelines for RMR measurements in athletic cohorts must consider these barriers and enablers as they highlight unique characteristics of athletes and their environment.

Keywords

MeSH Term

Humans
Basal Metabolism
Qualitative Research
Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport
Athletic Performance
Sports
Sports Nutritional Physiological Phenomena

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0RMRLEAmeasurementsenablersmeasuringmeasurementathleterestingmetabolicratedietaryplanningpurposesstudybarriershigh-performance���=���6sixNationalsportingBarriersincludedscepticismresearchenvironmentusequalitativeMeasurementsmayundertakenassesslowenergyavailabilityinvestigatedreal-worldsportenvironmentsTwelveinterviewsconductedtechniciansdietitiansphysiologistsemployedacrossInstituteNetworkstwoSportingOrganisationsoneprofessionalcodepredominantlymeasuredscreenoccurringinstancesDatathematicallyanalysedmainthemesidentifiedlackconfidenceburdentechnicianconfusionresponsibilityindicatorSubthemescontributedincluded:thresholdsusedindicateunansweredquestionserrorsintroducedpresentationtestingequipmentand/orEnablersperceivedvalue'piecepuzzle'assessinglongitudinalmeasureBestpracticeguidelinesathleticcohortsmustconsiderhighlightuniquecharacteristicsathletessystem:exploratorysurrogateREDsrecommendationsthematicanalysis

Similar Articles

Cited By