Failed labral reconstruction of the hip can be successfully revised to another labral reconstruction: improved patient-reported outcomes at a minimum of 2-year follow-up.

Brian J White, R Presley Swann, Hannah Spears, Anna Shafer, Shannon M Constantinides
Author Information
  1. Brian J White: Western Orthopaedics, 1830 Franklin Street, Denver, CO 80218, United States.
  2. R Presley Swann: Colorado Knee & Hip, 799 East Hampden Ave, Englewood, CO 80113, United States.
  3. Hannah Spears: Western Orthopaedics, 1830 Franklin Street, Denver, CO 80218, United States.
  4. Anna Shafer: Western Orthopaedics, 1830 Franklin Street, Denver, CO 80218, United States.
  5. Shannon M Constantinides: Rock Harbor Research Institute, Key Largo, FL 33037, United States. ORCID

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to validate the success of revision arthroscopic circumferential allograft labral reconstruction (CLR) in nonarthritic hips, which, in the rare case of failure, had previously undergone labral reconstruction by the same surgeon. Using a minimum of 24-month follow-up, data from 24 hips having undergone revision CLR were analyzed to determine improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs). All included cases completed a minimum of 24 months follow-up, with a success rate of 96%. All PROs improved significantly, with exceptionally strong measures of effect. Modified Harris Hip Scores improved by a mean of 26.68 points, with 88% of patients meeting the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (+6.49,  ≤ .001,  = 1.32). Lower Extremity Functional Scale scores improved by a mean of 21.88 points, with 78% of patients meeting the MCID (+7.79,  ≤ .001,  = 1.32). pain as rated by the Visual Analog Scale, including at rest, during activities of daily living, and with sports, was significantly improved with strong measures of effect, with >75% of patients having met the MCID. This study validated that a failed labral reconstruction of the hip can be revised safely and effectively to another labral reconstruction of the hip. While labral reconstruction has broadly been shown to result in highly favorable outcomes, this study demonstrated that in the rare case of failure, revision CLR is not only feasible but results in improved pain and functionality.

References

  1. Arthroscopy. 2018 Feb;34(2):433-440 [PMID: 29100774]
  2. Front Surg. 2020 Oct 16;7:61 [PMID: 33195381]
  3. Am J Sports Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):612-619 [PMID: 27765733]
  4. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Feb 16;9(2):2325967120977088 [PMID: 33644246]
  5. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2019 Jun;12(2):156-165 [PMID: 30919325]
  6. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Feb 05;8(2):2325967119900767 [PMID: 32076628]
  7. Arthrosc Tech. 2016 Feb 01;5(1):e89-97 [PMID: 27073784]
  8. Hip Int. 2021 Nov;31(6):704-713 [PMID: 33090881]
  9. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Feb;473(2):602-7 [PMID: 24989124]
  10. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 Jun 03;17:143 [PMID: 26036334]
  11. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Jan;43(1):98-104 [PMID: 25361860]
  12. Arthroscopy. 2019 Jul;35(7):2175-2186 [PMID: 31272640]
  13. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Apr;22(4):730-6 [PMID: 24509878]
  14. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):812-9 [PMID: 24557859]
  15. Arthroscopy. 2020 Oct;36(10):2598-2610 [PMID: 32389774]
  16. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010 Feb;92(2):296-303 [PMID: 20124055]
  17. Arthroscopy. 2016 Sep;32(9):1877-86 [PMID: 27324968]
  18. Spine J. 2007 Sep-Oct;7(5):541-6 [PMID: 17448732]
  19. Arthroscopy. 2023 Jan;39(1):41-50 [PMID: 35724802]
  20. Arthroscopy. 2020 Aug;36(8):2137-2144 [PMID: 32360267]
  21. Am J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1844-9 [PMID: 26078452]
  22. Arthroscopy. 2016 Dec;32(12):2513-2520 [PMID: 27720304]
  23. Front Surg. 2015 Jul 02;2:27 [PMID: 26217668]
  24. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Oct;161(4):551-560 [PMID: 31159641]
  25. Am J Sports Med. 2022 May;50(6):1571-1581 [PMID: 35438028]
  26. Arthroscopy. 2016 Jan;32(1):26-32 [PMID: 26422708]
  27. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2022 Apr;15(2):27-37 [PMID: 35141846]
  28. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2023 Jul-Aug;26(4):334-343 [PMID: 37970301]
  29. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;48(7):1748-1755 [PMID: 31634004]
  30. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jun 3;10(6):23259671221100861 [PMID: 35677021]
  31. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014 Apr;22(4):722-9 [PMID: 24519614]
  32. Am J Sports Med. 2020 Sep;48(11):2726-2732 [PMID: 32762634]
  33. Arthroscopy. 2020 Jul;36(7):1811-1812 [PMID: 32624118]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0labralreconstructionimprovedstudyrevisionCLRminimumfollow-upoutcomespatientsMCIDhipsuccesshipsrarecasefailureundergonepatient-reportedPROssignificantlystrongmeasureseffectmeanpointsmeeting ≤ 001 = 132ScalecanrevisedanotherpurposevalidatearthroscopiccircumferentialallograftnonarthriticpreviouslysurgeonUsing24-monthdata24analyzeddetermineimprovementsincludedcasescompleted24 monthsrate96%exceptionallyModifiedHarrisHipScores266888%minimalclinicallyimportantdifference+649LowerExtremityFunctionalscores218878%+779PainratedVisualAnalogincludingrestactivitiesdailylivingsports>75%metvalidatedfailedsafelyeffectivelybroadlyshownresulthighlyfavorabledemonstratedfeasibleresultspainfunctionalityFailedsuccessfullyreconstruction:2-year

Similar Articles

Cited By