Ultrasound tissue characterization and function of Achilles tendon in psoriatic arthritis patients: a cross-sectional study.

Chiara Busso, Simone Parisi, Marta Andrighetti, Maria C Ditto, Giuseppe Massazza, Enrico Fusaro, Marco A Minetto
Author Information
  1. Chiara Busso: Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  2. Simone Parisi: Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citt�� della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
  3. Marta Andrighetti: Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  4. Maria C Ditto: Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citt�� della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
  5. Giuseppe Massazza: Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
  6. Enrico Fusaro: Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Citt�� della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
  7. Marco A Minetto: Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy - marco.minetto@unito.it.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Achilles tendon is one of the most frequent sites of tendinopathy in both healthy and pathological subjects. An innovative approach for the quantitative assessment of the Achilles tendon structure, named Ultrasound Tissue Characterization (UTC), has recently been developed. However, no previous study performed the UTC-based assessment of the tendon structure in rheumatologic patients affected by insertional Achilles tendinopathy.
AIM: To characterize the Achilles tendon structure and function in psoriatic arthritis patients with symptomatic insertional tendinopathy.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: University laboratory.
POPULATION: psoriatic arthritis patients (N.=17).
METHODS: Anthropometric measurements, administration of outcome and Pain questionnaires, and tendon function and structure assessments were performed in a single experimental session.
RESULTS: Pain intensity and interference and the perceived tendinopathy-related disability were moderate-severe. A relevant impairment of the strength (for both lower limbs) and walking performance was observed in all patients. In fact, the plantarflexion strength values (median values for the two sides: 10.0 and 11.5 kg) and fast walking speed (median value: 1.7 m/s) were lower than the normative values for healthy controls, respectively, in all patients for the strength values and in 14 out of 17 patients for the walking speed. The conventional ultrasound (i.e., the quantification of tendon thickness and the qualitative assessments of tendon structure and neovascularization) showed greater changes in the symptomatic (or more symptomatic) side compared with the asymptomatic (or less symptomatic) side of the insertional region of the Achilles tendon. The UTC imaging showed comparable impairment of the tendon structure between the symptomatic (or more symptomatic) side and the asymptomatic (or less symptomatic) side of the insertional region of the Achilles tendon (i.e., reduced echo-type I percentages in both tendons of all patients).
CONCLUSIONS: psoriatic arthritis patients with symptomatic insertional Achilles tendinopathy present moderate-severe Pain and perceived disability, physical function impairments, and bilateral deterioration of the tendon structure (also in case of unilateral symptoms) that can be documented through the UTC analysis.
CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The evaluation of the insertional Achilles tendinopathy through UTC imaging can be useful for the diagnostic and prognostic assessment of psoriatic arthritis patients in combination with the assessments of Pain, disability, and functional performance.

References

  1. J Rheumatol. 2022 Jun;49(6 Suppl 1):52-54 [PMID: 35293339]
  2. Am J Sports Med. 1998 May-Jun;26(3):360-6 [PMID: 9617396]
  3. J Sci Med Sport. 2015 Jul;18(4):383-7 [PMID: 25024134]
  4. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020 Aug 04;6(1):e000760 [PMID: 32818059]
  5. Age Ageing. 1997 Jan;26(1):15-9 [PMID: 9143432]
  6. Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug;54(8):2665-73 [PMID: 16871531]
  7. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Jan;84(1):1-8 [PMID: 11837811]
  8. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(20-22):1635-9 [PMID: 18608373]
  9. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jun;54(11):627-630 [PMID: 31519545]
  10. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;50(24):1516-1523 [PMID: 27633025]
  11. J Physiother. 2016 Jan;62(1):52 [PMID: 26303366]
  12. Br J Sports Med. 2010 Dec;44(16):1153-9 [PMID: 19666626]
  13. Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Sep;9(5):3546-3552 [PMID: 32787369]
  14. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Feb;49(3):183-7 [PMID: 24735840]
  15. PLoS One. 2018 Jun 21;13(6):e0199645 [PMID: 29928054]
  16. Clin J Sport Med. 2021 May 1;31(3):e161-e175 [PMID: 31241489]
  17. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82 [PMID: 23092060]
  18. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017 Apr;12(Suppl 2):S2122-S2126 [PMID: 27918676]
  19. Br J Sports Med. 2001 Oct;35(5):335-41 [PMID: 11579069]
  20. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Sep;98(9):806-810 [PMID: 31021822]
  21. Am J Sports Med. 2009 Mar;37(3):463-70 [PMID: 19088057]
  22. Am J Vet Res. 2003 Mar;64(3):366-75 [PMID: 12661879]
  23. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Apr;99(4):806-812 [PMID: 29233625]
  24. Sports Med. 2022 Jun;52(6):1219-1222 [PMID: 35084703]
  25. Neuropsychologia. 1998 Jan;36(1):37-43 [PMID: 9533385]
  26. Clin Anat. 2025 Jan;38(1):29-34 [PMID: 38860583]
  27. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017 Nov 21;13(12):731-741 [PMID: 29158573]
  28. Front Med (Lausanne). 2020 Aug 25;7:487 [PMID: 32984374]
  29. J Sports Sci Med. 2011 Jun 01;10(2):238-53 [PMID: 24149868]
  30. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1991 Mar;54(3):244-7 [PMID: 2030353]
  31. Pain. 1996 Apr;65(1):87-92 [PMID: 8826494]
  32. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91 [PMID: 17695343]
  33. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 11;11(16): [PMID: 37628466]
  34. Clin J Sport Med. 2004 Jan;14(1):40-4 [PMID: 14712165]
  35. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Jun;24(6):1988-96 [PMID: 25193569]
  36. Physiotherapy. 2017 Dec;103(4):446-452 [PMID: 28886865]
  37. Br J Sports Med. 2016 Feb;50(4):209-15 [PMID: 26407586]
  38. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020 Nov 13;10(11): [PMID: 33202763]
  39. Br J Sports Med. 2015 Aug;49(15):995-9 [PMID: 25586910]

MeSH Term

Humans
Achilles Tendon
Cross-Sectional Studies
Arthritis, Psoriatic
Male
Female
Middle Aged
Ultrasonography
Adult
Tendinopathy
Pain Measurement

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0tendonAchillespatientssymptomaticstructureinsertionaltendinopathyarthritisUTCfunctionvaluessideassessmentstudypsoriaticpainassessmentsdisabilitystrengthwalkinghealthyUltrasoundperformedPsoriaticperceivedmoderate-severeimpairmentlowerperformancemedianspeedieshowedasymptomaticlessregionimagingcanBACKGROUND:onefrequentsitespathologicalsubjectsinnovativeapproachquantitativenamedTissueCharacterizationrecentlydevelopedHoweverpreviousUTC-basedrheumatologicaffectedAIM:characterizeDESIGN:Cross-sectionalSETTING:UniversitylaboratoryPOPULATION:N=17METHODS:AnthropometricmeasurementsadministrationoutcomequestionnairessingleexperimentalsessionRESULTS:Painintensityinterferencetendinopathy-relatedrelevantlimbsobservedfactplantarflexiontwosides:100115kgfastvalue:17m/snormativecontrolsrespectively1417conventionalultrasoundquantificationthicknessqualitativeneovascularizationgreaterchangescomparedcomparablereducedecho-typepercentagestendonsCONCLUSIONS:presentphysicalimpairmentsbilateraldeteriorationalsocaseunilateralsymptomsdocumentedanalysisCLINICALREHABILITATIONIMPACT:evaluationusefuldiagnosticprognosticcombinationfunctionaltissuecharacterizationpatients:cross-sectional

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.