Health Economic Evaluations of Obesity Interventions: Expert Views on How We Can Identify, Interpret, Analyse and Translate Effects.

Samira B Jabakhanji, Gintare Valentelyte, Fabian Manke-Reimers, Vidar Halsteinli, R��nnaug ��deg��rd, Adam Martin, Grace O'Malley, Jan Sorensen, Emilia Hagman, COBWEB network
Author Information
  1. Samira B Jabakhanji: Centre for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Baden-W��rttemberg, Germany.
  2. Gintare Valentelyte: School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
  3. Fabian Manke-Reimers: Centre for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Baden-W��rttemberg, Germany.
  4. Vidar Halsteinli: Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  5. R��nnaug ��deg��rd: Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
  6. Adam Martin: Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  7. Grace O'Malley: School of Physiotherapy, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
  8. Jan Sorensen: School of Population Health, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
  9. Emilia Hagman: Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. emilia.hagman@ki.se. ORCID

Abstract

Economic evaluations of obesity interventions are critical to informing policymakers and clinical practitioners about best-value prevention and treatment interventions. However, existing studies often fail to measure appropriate outcomes over sufficient time periods and to adequately address the complexity of data, environments and outcomes. An international, multidisciplinary workshop in Ireland (May 2023) addressed these issues through scientific presentations on obesity modelling, group discussions and interactive small-group exercises. Nineteen presenters and participants co-created a list of research needs, priorities and strategies for the long-term study of obesity and its complications. To support availability of relevant outcome and cost data for health economic analyses, participants highlighted a need to define standards for data collection, data sharing, modelling, and integrating a systems perspective. For example, regarding data collection, careful consideration must be given to selecting valid and relevant health-related outcomes for determining future health risk. Although these issues have been previously highlighted, they remain critical barriers to comprehensive economic obesity studies. To identify best-value obesity interventions, researchers should prioritise strategies to overcome these barriers. This includes early engagement with multidisciplinary stakeholders to integrate diverse perspectives. Developing infrastructure to support international collaborations between researchers, policymakers and patient representatives was also recommended. Additionally, establishing best-practice guidelines could help researchers navigate the complexities of obesity data, environments and outcomes, particularly in data-scarce research environments. The creation of a core outcomes set for obesity would standardise measures for economic evaluations, thereby facilitating more robust cross-country comparisons of intervention effects and improving the evidence base and overall quality of future obesity research.

References

  1. Swinburn BA, Kraak VI, Allender S, Atkins VJ, Baker PI, Bogard JR, et al. The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: the Lancet Commission report. The Lancet. 2019;393(10173):791���846. [DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32822-8]
  2. Griffiths C, Radley D, Gately P, South J, Sanders G, Morris MA, et al. A complex systems approach to obesity: a transdisciplinary framework for action. Perspect Public Health. 2023:17579139231180761.
  3. Jebeile H, Kelly AS, O���Malley G, Baur LA. Obesity in children and adolescents: epidemiology, causes, assessment, and management. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2022;10(5):351���65. [DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(22)00047-X]
  4. Balogun B, Powell T, Baker C, Conway L, Long R. Obesity policy in England���research briefing: House of Commons library; 2023.
  5. Chong B, Jayabaskaran J, Kong G, Chan YH, Chin YH, Goh R, et al. Trends and predictions of malnutrition and obesity in 204 countries and territories: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. eClinicalMedicine. 2023;57.
  6. World Obesity Federation. World Obesity Atlas 2023. 2023.
  7. Schell RC, Just DR, Levitsky DA. Methodological challenges in estimating the lifetime medical care cost externality of obesity. J Benefit Cost Anal. 2021;12(3):441���65. [DOI: 10.1017/bca.2021.6]
  8. Health Information and Quality Authority. HTA of metabolic surgery for comorbid T2D and obesity. 2022.
  9. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Obesity: identification, assessment and management. 2023.
  10. Levy DT, Mabry PL, Wang YC, Gortmaker S, Huang TT-K, Marsh T, et al. Simulation models of obesity: a review of the literature and implications for research and policy. Obes Rev. 2011;12(5):378���94. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00804.x]
  11. Husereau D, Drummond M, Augustovski F, de Bekker-Grob E, Briggs AH, Carswell C, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) statement: updated reporting guidance for health economic evaluations. BMC Med. 2022;20(1):23.
  12. Frew E, Ng SW, Coast J, Hollingsworth B, Smith R. How can economics help tackle obesity? Obesity. 2018;26(7):1112���3. [DOI: 10.1002/oby.22211]
  13. Collaboration in health economic modelling of overweight and obesity. Study event May 2023���how do we measure success of obesity interventions? 2023 [cited 2023 20-7-2023]. https://obesitycobweb.wordpress.com/rcsi-event/
  14. Bilde L, S��rensen J. European models for purchasing strategies: EuroPurse Series���final report. Copenhagen: DSI; 1999 October 1999.
  15. OECD, Union E. Hip and knee surgery; 2022.
  16. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Overweight and obesity management. 2024 [cited 17/05/2024]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/indevelopment/gid-ng10182 .
  17. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Overweight and obesity management: diet interventions���economic model report. Draft for consultation; 2023.
  18. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Weight management: preventing, assessing and managing overweight and obesity���inequality analysis of health outcomes of different diets in achieving and maintaining weight loss. Draft for consultation; 2023.
  19. Degtiar I, Rose S. A review of generalizability and transportability. Annu Rev Stat Appl. 2023;10(1):501���24. [DOI: 10.1146/annurev-statistics-042522-103837]
  20. ICF Research Branch. ICF-based documentation tool���ICF core sets in clinical practice. 2023 [cited 2023 20-7-2023]. https://www.icf-core-sets.org/ .
  21. Smith V, Warty R, Nair A, Krishnan S, Sursas JA, da Silva Costa F, et al. Defining the clinician���s role in early health technology assessment during medical device innovation���a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19(1):514. [DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4305-9]
  22. Wang Y, Rattanavipapong W, Teerawattananon Y. Using health technology assessment to set priority, inform target product profiles, and design clinical study for health innovation. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2021;172: 121000. [DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121000]
  23. Grutters JPC, Kluytmans A, van der Wilt GJ, Tummers M. Methods for early assessment of the societal value of health technologies: a scoping review and proposal for classification. Value Health. 2022;25(7):1227���34. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.12.003]
  24. Kokosi T, De Stavola B, Mitra R, Frayling L, Doherty A, Dove I, et al. An overview of synthetic administrative data for research. Int J Popul Data Sci. 2022;7(1):1727. [PMID: 37650026]
  25. Dahabreh IJ, Robertson SE, Steingrimsson JA, Stuart EA, Hern��n MA. Extending inferences from a randomized trial to a new target population. Stat Med. 2020;39(14):1999���2014. [DOI: 10.1002/sim.8426]
  26. Josey KP, Yang F, Ghosh D, Raghavan S. A calibration approach to transportability and data-fusion with observational data. Stat Med. 2022;41(23):4511���31. [DOI: 10.1002/sim.9523]
  27. Peters DH. The application of systems thinking in health: why use systems thinking? Health Res Policy Syst. 2014;12(1):51. [DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-12-51]
  28. Damschroder LJ, Reardon CM, Widerquist MAO, Lowery J. The updated consolidated framework for implementation research based on user feedback. Implement Sci. 2022;17(1):75. [DOI: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0]

MeSH Term

Humans
Obesity
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Ireland

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0obesitydataoutcomesinterventionsenvironmentsresearcheconomicresearchersEconomicevaluationscriticalpolicymakersbest-valuestudiesinternationalmultidisciplinaryissuesmodellingparticipantsstrategiessupportrelevanthealthhighlightedcollectionfuturebarriersinformingclinicalpractitionerspreventiontreatmentHoweverexistingoftenfailmeasureappropriatesufficienttimeperiodsadequatelyaddresscomplexityworkshopIrelandMay2023addressedscientificpresentationsgroupdiscussionsinteractivesmall-groupexercisesNineteenpresentersco-createdlistneedsprioritieslong-termstudycomplicationsavailabilityoutcomecostanalysesneeddefinestandardssharingintegratingsystemsperspectiveexampleregardingcarefulconsiderationmustgivenselectingvalidhealth-relateddeterminingriskAlthoughpreviouslyremaincomprehensiveidentifyprioritiseovercomeincludesearlyengagementstakeholdersintegratediverseperspectivesDevelopinginfrastructurecollaborationspatientrepresentativesalsorecommendedAdditionallyestablishingbest-practiceguidelineshelpnavigatecomplexitiesparticularlydata-scarcecreationcoresetstandardisemeasurestherebyfacilitatingrobustcross-countrycomparisonsinterventioneffectsimprovingevidencebaseoverallqualityHealthEvaluationsObesityInterventions:ExpertViewsCanIdentifyInterpretAnalyseTranslateEffects

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.