The relationship between a simulated glaucoma impairment and postural threat on quiet stance.

Lisa K Lavalle, Nora Pourhashemi, Taylor W Cleworth
Author Information
  1. Lisa K Lavalle: School of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, ON Canada.
  2. Nora Pourhashemi: School of Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON Canada.
  3. Taylor W Cleworth: School of Kinesiology and Health Science, Faculty of Health, York University, Toronto, ON Canada.

Abstract

Peripheral visual field deficits developed through glaucoma have been shown to contribute to balance deficits and a fear of falling. Currently, there is no work that examines the relationship between fear of falling and quiet stance among glaucoma patients. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the impact of a virtual height-induced postural threat on balance control among healthy individuals exposed to a simulated glaucoma impairment. Participants stood on a force plate to measure kinetic responses while wearing a virtual reality (VR) head-mounted display (HMD) which also tracked head position. Surface electromyography (EMG) was also used to measure muscle activity from ankle stabilizing muscles. Trials were 60 s, with two at ground level and two at 7 virtual meters above ground, each exposing participants to normal vision and a VR-simulated glaucoma impairment. Electrodermal activity was collected, and questionnaires were completed following each trial to evaluate psychological aspects of the postural threat. Overall, while experiencing height-induced fear with normal vision, participants developed a tighter control of upright stance (decreased amplitude and increased frequency of balance-related movement); however, this was not observed for the simulated glaucoma conditions. Therefore, balance deficits among glaucoma patients may be mediated by fear of falling contributing to an unexpected postural strategy.

Keywords

References

  1. Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Feb;57:442-450 [PMID: 29074307]
  2. Handb Clin Neurol. 2018;159:27-42 [PMID: 30482320]
  3. Gait Posture. 2000 Oct;12(2):87-93 [PMID: 10998604]
  4. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1984 Feb;57(2):134-42 [PMID: 6198154]
  5. J Neurophysiol. 2002 Sep;88(3):1097-118 [PMID: 12205132]
  6. Exp Brain Res. 2002 Mar;143(2):160-70 [PMID: 11880892]
  7. Ophthalmology. 2015 Jun;122(6):1131-8 [PMID: 25892017]
  8. JAMA. 2014 May 14;311(18):1901-11 [PMID: 24825645]
  9. J Anxiety Disord. 2001 Jan-Apr;15(1-2):81-94 [PMID: 11388359]
  10. Hum Mov Sci. 2007 Feb;26(1):103-12 [PMID: 17137663]
  11. Exp Brain Res. 2006 Sep;174(2):256-69 [PMID: 16685508]
  12. PLoS One. 2017 Dec 6;12(12):e0187220 [PMID: 29211742]
  13. Neurosci Lett. 2022 Apr 23;777:136586 [PMID: 35331814]
  14. Physiother Theory Pract. 2023 May;39(5):895-911 [PMID: 35180834]
  15. Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;227:275-283 [PMID: 33626364]
  16. Encephale. 1983;9(4 Suppl 2):205B-210B [PMID: 6144515]
  17. Sci Rep. 2019 Aug 28;9(1):12449 [PMID: 31462652]
  18. Optom Vis Sci. 2008 Jun;85(6):489-97 [PMID: 18521027]
  19. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2000 Jun;278(6):H2039-49 [PMID: 10843903]
  20. Front Neurol. 2023 Jun 05;14:1179237 [PMID: 37342783]
  21. Exp Brain Res. 1997 Feb;113(2):243-8 [PMID: 9063710]
  22. Exp Brain Res. 2017 Nov;235(11):3261-3270 [PMID: 28765993]
  23. PLoS One. 2020 Oct 29;15(10):e0241479 [PMID: 33119679]
  24. PLoS One. 2017 Oct 9;12(10):e0184552 [PMID: 28991916]
  25. CMAJ. 2015 Sep 8;187(12):E398-9 [PMID: 25421984]
  26. Hum Mov Sci. 2011 Apr;30(2):203-12 [PMID: 20542347]
  27. Gait Posture. 2012 Jun;36(2):172-6 [PMID: 22464634]
  28. NPJ Digit Med. 2020 Mar 10;3:32 [PMID: 32195367]
  29. Exp Brain Res. 2020 Nov;238(11):2653-2663 [PMID: 32944785]
  30. Brain Inj. 2021 Apr 16;35(5):587-595 [PMID: 33734923]
  31. Neurosci Lett. 2023 Feb 16;797:137068 [PMID: 36641046]
  32. J Neurol. 2021 Apr;268(4):1374-1384 [PMID: 33141249]
  33. Gait Posture. 2009 Feb;29(2):275-9 [PMID: 18963992]
  34. Ophthalmology. 2012 Jul;119(7):1352-8 [PMID: 22480738]
  35. Clin Neurophysiol. 2016 Jun;127(6):2463-71 [PMID: 27178866]
  36. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2020 May 1;138(5):536-543 [PMID: 32239185]
  37. Gait Posture. 2009 Nov;30(4):528-32 [PMID: 19729308]
  38. Exp Brain Res. 2001 May;138(2):210-8 [PMID: 11417462]
  39. J Vestib Res. 1999;9(4):277-86 [PMID: 10472040]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0glaucomafearposturalthreatdeficitsbalancefallingstanceamongvirtualcontrolsimulatedimpairmentdevelopedrelationshipquietpatientsThereforeheight-inducedmeasurerealityalsoactivitytwogroundparticipantsnormalvisionPosturalPeripheralvisualfieldshowncontributeCurrentlyworkexaminesstudyaimedexamineimpacthealthyindividualsexposedParticipantsstoodforceplatekineticresponseswearingVRhead-mounteddisplayHMDtrackedheadpositionSurfaceelectromyographyEMGusedmuscleanklestabilizingmusclesTrials60 slevel7metersexposingVR-simulatedElectrodermalcollectedquestionnairescompletedfollowingtrialevaluatepsychologicalaspectsOverallexperiencingtighteruprightdecreasedamplitudeincreasedfrequencybalance-relatedmovementhoweverobservedconditionsmaymediatedcontributingunexpectedstrategyGlaucomaVirtual

Similar Articles

Cited By