Comparison of Graft Uptake in Perforated Eardrums with and without Myringosclerosis: A Prospective Case-control Study in a Tertiary Centre.

Ayaz Rehman, Faizah Ashfah Latief Deva, Asef Ahmad Wani, Majid Masoodi, Bashir Malik, Owais Makhdoomi
Author Information
  1. Ayaz Rehman: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, SKIMS Medical College and Hospital, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
  2. Faizah Ashfah Latief Deva: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, SKIMS Medical College and Hospital, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. ORCID
  3. Asef Ahmad Wani: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, SKIMS Medical College and Hospital, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
  4. Majid Masoodi: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, SKIMS Medical College and Hospital, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
  5. Bashir Malik: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, SKIMS Medical College and Hospital, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
  6. Owais Makhdoomi: Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, SKIMS Medical College and Hospital, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India.

Abstract

���Various factors have been reported to affect the rates of success after tympanoplasty, among them, myringosclerosis. However, there are few studies focusing only on the effect of myringosclerotic plaque removal on tympanoplasty outcomes. ���To compare the outcome of tympanoplasty in perforated eardrums with and without myringosclerosis. ���The study included patients aged between 21 and 53 years diagnosed at the outpatient department with inactive mucosal chronic otitis media. The sample was divided into the case group, which included subjects with tympanic membrane perforation and myringosclerosis, and the control group, which included subjects with tympanic membrane perforation only, without myringosclerosis. We assessed the audiological findings of the patients before and after surgery, as well as hearing gain, graft uptake, and residual perforation/reperforation. ���No significant relationships were observed involving the age or sex of the patient and the closure rate or hearing gain, neither between the location of the perforation and graft uptake. Graft uptake was higher in patients with perforation size���<���50%. The graft uptake and hearing gain were higher in the case group. ���The removal of sclerotic plaques increases the surface of the raw area created by subepithelial excision of the myringosclerotic plaques, leading to a high rate of surgical success for the closure of tympanic membrane defects with coexisting myringosclerosis.

Keywords

References

  1. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990 Jan;116(1):35-40 [PMID: 2294938]
  2. Laryngoscope. 1987 Sep;97(9):1012-6 [PMID: 3626722]
  3. Int J Dermatol. 2011 Sep;50(9):1058-66 [PMID: 22126865]
  4. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998 May;118(5):709-13 [PMID: 9591879]
  5. Laryngoscope. 1999 Jan;109(1):47-51 [PMID: 9917039]
  6. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005 Aug;69(8):1071-6 [PMID: 16005349]
  7. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2015 Feb;42(1):20-3 [PMID: 25183404]
  8. Am J Otol. 1998 Mar;19(2):136-40 [PMID: 9520047]
  9. J Laryngol Otol. 2001 May;115(5):369-73 [PMID: 11410126]
  10. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jun;280(6):2639-2652 [PMID: 36811654]
  11. Laryngoscope. 1973 Nov;83(11):1754-8 [PMID: 4202224]
  12. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003 Oct;28(5):396-8 [PMID: 12969339]
  13. Am J Otol. 1985 Jan;6(1):85-8 [PMID: 3976866]
  14. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Mar-Apr;77(2):229-36 [PMID: 21537625]
  15. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2002 Oct;27(5):331-4 [PMID: 12383291]
  16. Am J Otol. 1995 Nov;16(6):811-4 [PMID: 8572148]
  17. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Nov;276(11):3081-3087 [PMID: 31482334]
  18. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Feb;136(2):189-92 [PMID: 17275537]
  19. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2006 Dec;115(12):875-9 [PMID: 17214259]
  20. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 Jun;264(6):595-9 [PMID: 17235531]
  21. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003 Oct;129(10):1053-5 [PMID: 14568786]
  22. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Feb;16(1):64-8 [PMID: 18197025]
  23. Laryngoscope. 1984 Jul;94(7):916-8 [PMID: 6738270]
  24. Otol Neurotol. 2007 Apr;28(3):353-5 [PMID: 17414041]
  25. Saudi Med J. 2003 Jan;24(1):58-61 [PMID: 12590277]
  26. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Mar;28(85):99-104 [PMID: 27280095]
  27. J Laryngol Otol. 2009 Sep;123(9):973-7 [PMID: 19134245]
  28. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005 Apr;30(2):115-20 [PMID: 15839862]
  29. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008 Sep;139(3):386-90 [PMID: 18722218]
  30. J Laryngol Otol. 2009 Sep;123(9):969-72 [PMID: 19454135]
  31. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 1998 Jan;42(3):207-23 [PMID: 9466224]
  32. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2007 Oct-Dec;46(168):180-4 [PMID: 18340370]
  33. Physiol Rev. 2003 Jul;83(3):835-70 [PMID: 12843410]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0myringosclerosisperforationuptaketympanoplastytympanicmembranewithoutincludedpatientsgrouphearinggaingraftsuccessmyringoscleroticremovaloutcome���TheotitismediacasesubjectsclosurerateGrafthigherplaques���VariousfactorsreportedaffectratesamongHoweverstudiesfocusingeffectplaqueoutcomes���Tocompareperforatedeardrumsstudyaged2153yearsdiagnosedoutpatientdepartmentinactivemucosalchronicsampledividedcontrolassessedaudiologicalfindingssurgerywellresidualperforation/reperforation���Nosignificantrelationshipsobservedinvolvingagesexpatientneitherlocationsize���<���50%scleroticincreasessurfacerawareacreatedsubepithelialexcisionleadinghighsurgicaldefectscoexistingComparisonUptakePerforatedEardrumsMyringosclerosis:ProspectiveCase-controlStudyTertiaryCentresclerosis

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.