Aortomesenteric angle: A contrast-enhanced computed tomography analysis of respiratory phase and visceral fat impact.

Hirofumi Sekino, Shiro Ishii, Yumi Saito, Junko Hara, Ryo Yamakuni, Kenji Fukushima, Hiroshi Ito
Author Information
  1. Hirofumi Sekino: Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan. ORCID
  2. Shiro Ishii: Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan. ORCID
  3. Yumi Saito: Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
  4. Junko Hara: Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
  5. Ryo Yamakuni: Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan. ORCID
  6. Kenji Fukushima: Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan. ORCID
  7. Hiroshi Ito: Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan. ORCID

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between the aortomesenteric angle at end-inspiration and end-expiration and its variation rate with several anthropometric parameters.
Material and Methods: Sagittal reconstructed computed tomography (CT) images of 59 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced CT at end-inspiration and end-expiration between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed. All these patients underwent dynamic contrast CT during both inspiration and expiration for adrenal venous sampling purposes. Two experienced radiologists measured the aortomesenteric angle during both end-inspiration and end-expiration, and its variation rate. Pearson's or Spearman's correlation analysis was used to assess correlations between the angle or variation rate and height, weight, body mass index (BMI), visceral fat, subcutaneous fat, and diaphragm motion.
Results: The aortomesenteric angle was significantly larger at end-expiration (88.65 �� 25.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 82.09-95.20) compared to end-inspiration (62.22 �� 21.90, 95% CI 56.51-67.93, < 0.001). The aortomesenteric angles at both end-inspiration and end-expiration correlated significantly with weight, BMI, visceral fat, and subcutaneous fat. The strongest correlation was between aortomesenteric angle and visceral fat at both end-inspiration (r = 0.523, < 0.001) and end-expiration (r = 0.546, < 0.001). The variation rate correlated only with diaphragm motion (r = 0.550, < 0.001).
Conclusion: The aortomesenteric angle at end-expiration was significantly larger than at end-inspiration, with the strongest correlation found between the angle and visceral fat.

Keywords

References

  1. Insights Imaging. 2020 Mar 17;11(1):48 [PMID: 32185572]
  2. Sci Rep. 2022 Feb 16;12(1):2586 [PMID: 35173204]
  3. Radiother Oncol. 2005 May;75(2):149-56 [PMID: 16086906]
  4. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009 Oct;1790(10):1117-23 [PMID: 19364483]
  5. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Jul;24(7):1035-42 [PMID: 23796090]
  6. Int J Body Compos Res. 2010 Sep 1;8(3):103-108 [PMID: 24834015]
  7. Br J Radiol. 1995 Sep;68(813):1017-20 [PMID: 7496683]
  8. Radiology. 2003 Aug;228(2):437-42 [PMID: 12893901]
  9. Front Physiol. 2019 Dec 05;10:1486 [PMID: 31866877]
  10. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jun 1;65(2):554-60 [PMID: 16690437]
  11. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007 Oct;29(7):595-9 [PMID: 17646894]
  12. Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Aug;94:165-171 [PMID: 37023920]
  13. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 May;212(5):1024-1029 [PMID: 30835515]
  14. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2020 Jun;31(6):433-440 [PMID: 32721914]
  15. Ann Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;34:250-60 [PMID: 27116907]
  16. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 23;9(12):e114222 [PMID: 25536144]
  17. Physiol Res. 2009;58(3):383-392 [PMID: 18637703]
  18. Cureus. 2020 Aug 13;12(8):e9715 [PMID: 32821627]
  19. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jul 1;41(4):939-43 [PMID: 9652861]
  20. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997 Jul;17(7):1472-80 [PMID: 9261282]
  21. J Vasc Surg. 2018 Dec;68(6):1782-1787 [PMID: 29914831]
  22. Radiol Technol. 1997 Jul-Aug;68(6):487-90 [PMID: 9253058]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0anglefatend-inspirationend-expiration0aortomesentericvisceralvariationrate<001CTcorrelationsignificantlyr=computedtomographypatientsunderwentcontrast-enhancedanalysisweightmassindexBMIsubcutaneousdiaphragmmotionlarger��95%correlatedstrongestAortomesentericObjectives:objectivestudyevaluaterelationshipseveralanthropometricparametersMaterialMethods:Sagittalreconstructedimages5920152020revieweddynamiccontrastinspirationexpirationadrenalvenoussamplingpurposesTwoexperiencedradiologistsmeasuredPearson'sSpearman'susedassesscorrelationsheightbodyResults:88652515confidenceinterval[CI]8209-9520compared62222190CI5651-6793angles523546550Conclusion:foundangle:respiratoryphaseimpactBodyRespirationcycleVisceral

Similar Articles

Cited By