Bacterial resistance profile and its association with poor outcome among cirrhosis patients attending a tertiary care referral center in northern India.

Gerlin Varghese, Ashima Jamwal, Deepika Sarawat, Surender Singh, Nidhi Tejan, Sangram Singh Patel, Chinmoy Sahu
Author Information
  1. Gerlin Varghese: Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226 014, India.
  2. Ashima Jamwal: Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226 014, India.
  3. Deepika Sarawat: Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226 014, India.
  4. Surender Singh: Department of Hepatology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226 014, India. surmmcian2k6@gmail.com.
  5. Nidhi Tejan: Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226 014, India.
  6. Sangram Singh Patel: Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226 014, India.
  7. Chinmoy Sahu: Department of Microbiology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, 226 014, India. chinmoyresearch@gmail.com. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The epidemiological connections, predisposing factors and clinical outcomes of infections by drug-resistant bacteria in cirrhosis are poorly documented. Thus, this study was conducted to assess the risk factors, complications and patterns of bacterial resistance among these patients.
METHODS: This retrospective observational study was conducted from March 1, 2021, to July 31, 2023, at a tertiary care centre in Uttar Pradesh. patients of cirrhosis aged ≥ 18 years with microbial infection were included in the study. Samples, as indicated, were sent to the microbiology lab for culture and sensitivity. The patient's clinical history, details regarding bacterial culture and antibiotic sensitivity results were extracted from the hospital information system (HIS) and entered into an excel sheet. Univariate analysis of the variables was done and the statistical significance of these variables was determined using the p-value. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant.
RESULTS: During the study period, 765 patients were diagnosed with cirrhosis, of which 248 (32%) had a positive bacterial culture report. Among them, 206 (83.1%) patients recovered and were discharged in stable condition. Among the cirrhotic patients, the most common infection was spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (49.5%), followed by bacteremia (39.1%), lower respiratory tract infections (6.4%), urinary tract infections (2.9%) and skin and soft tissue infections (2%). Escherichia coli (28%) was the most common gram-negative bacteria. Multidrug-resistant organism infections were seen in 134 (54%) patients. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) infection (31.4%) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) infection (22.6%) were significantly associated with poor outcomes among these patients. Carbapenem-resistant organisms (22.6%) were the predominant resistant patterns seen among the gram-negative isolates in cirrhosis patients. The mortality rate among these cirrhotic patients with bacterial infection was 16.9%.
CONCLUSIONS: MDR and XDR bacterial infections in cirrhotic patients are an emerging threat that has a detrimental effect on prognosis. Thus, it is critical to assess strategies to prevent the development of antibiotic resistance in cirrhosis.

Keywords

References

  1. Piano S, Tonon M, Angeli P. Changes in the epidemiology and management of bacterial infections in cirrhosis. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2021;27:437–45. https://doi.org/10.3350/cmh.2020.0329 . [DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2020.0329]
  2. Ekpanyapong S, Reddy KR. Infections in cirrhosis. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol. 2019;17:254–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11938-019-00229-2 . [DOI: 10.1007/s11938-019-00229-2]
  3. Bruns T, Zimmermann HW, Stallmach A. Risk factors and outcome of bacterial infections in cirrhosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:2542–54. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i10.2542 . [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i10.2542]
  4. Piano S, Brocca A, Mareso S, Angeli P. Infections complicating cirrhosis. Liver Int. 2018;38 Suppl 1:126–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.13645 . [DOI: 10.1111/liv.13645]
  5. Garg P, Verma N, Angrup A, et al. Exploring the prevalence, predictors, and impact of bacterial infections to guide empiric antimicrobial decisions in cirrhosis (EPIC-AD). J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024;5:101352. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101352]
  6. Fernández J, Prado V, Trebicka J, et al. Multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and with acute-on-chronic liver failure in Europe. J Hepatol. 2019;70:398–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.10.027 .
  7. Fernández J, Acevedo J, Castro M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of infections by multiresistant bacteria in cirrhosis: a prospective study. Hepatology. 2012;55:1551–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.25532 . [DOI: 10.1002/hep.25532]
  8. Fernández J, Piano S, Bartoletti M, Wey EQ. Management of bacterial and fungal infections in cirrhosis: the MDRO challenge. J Hepatol. 2021;75 Suppl 1:S101–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.010 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.010]
  9. Tariq T, Irfan FB, Farishta M, et al. Spontaneous fungal peritonitis: micro-organisms, management and mortality in liver cirrhosis-a systematic review. World J Hepatol. 2019;11:596–606. https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v11.i7.596 .
  10. Verma N, Singh S, Syal A, et al. Invasive aspergillosis is a critical determinant of mortality in cirrhosis: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Med Mycol. 2021;59:1092–100. https://doi.org/10.1093/mmy/myab044 .
  11. European Association for the Study of the Liver. Electronic address: easloffice@easloffice.eu; European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2018;69:406–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.024 . Erratum in: J Hepatol. 2018;69:1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.08.009 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.024]
  12. Glossary of terms related to antibiotic resistance; National Antimicrobial Resistance monitoring system for enteric bacteria (NARMS); Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). https://www.cdc.gov/narms/resources/glossary . Accessed 24 September 2024
  13. Biggins SW, Angeli P, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of ascites, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatorenal syndrome: 2021 practice guidance by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology. 2021;74:1014–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.31884 . [DOI: 10.1002/hep.31884]
  14. Prah JK, Amoah S, Ocansey DW, et al. Evaluation of urinalysis parameters and antimicrobial susceptibility of uropathogens among out-patients at University of Cape Coast Hospital. Ghana Med J. 2019;53:44–51. https://doi.org/10.4314/gmj.v53i1.7 . [DOI: 10.4314/gmj.v53i1.7]
  15. Garrec H, Drieux-Rouzet L, Golmard JL, et al. Comparison of nine phenotypic methods for detecting extended-spectrum beta-lactamase production by Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:1048–57. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.02130-10 . [DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02130-10]
  16. CLSI, editor. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. 33rd ed. CLSI Supplement M100. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2023.
  17. Kaur P, Verma N, Valsan A, et al. Prevalence, risk factors, and impact of bacterial or fungal infections in acute liver failure patients from India. Dig Dis Sci. 2023;68:4022–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-023-07971-9 . [DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-07971-9]
  18. Fasolato S, Angeli P, Dallagnese L, et al. Renal failure and bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis: epidemiology and clinical features. Hepatology. 2007;45:223–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21443 . [DOI: 10.1002/hep.21443]
  19. de Mattos AA, Coral GP, Menti E, et al. Bacterial infection in cirrhotic patient. Arq Gastroenterol. 2003;40:11–5. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-28032003000100003 . [DOI: 10.1590/s0004-28032003000100003]
  20. Piano S, Singh V, Caraceni P, et al. International Club of Ascites Global Study Group 2019 Epidemiology and effects of bacterial infections in patients with cirrhosis worldwide. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:1368–80.e10. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.005 . [DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.12.005]
  21. Taneja S, Kumar P, Gautam V, et al. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis by Burkholderia cepacia complex: a rare, difficult to treat infection in decompensated cirrhotic patients. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2017;7:102–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2016.08.008 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2016.08.008]
  22. Lameirão Gomes C, Violante Silva R, Carrola P, Presa J. Bacterial infections in patients with liver cirrhosis in an internal medicine department. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2019;26:324–32. https://doi.org/10.1159/000494568 . [DOI: 10.1159/000494568]
  23. Verma N, Divakar Reddy PV, Vig S, et al. Burden, risk factors, and outcomes of multidrug-resistant bacterial colonization at multiple sites in patients with cirrhosis. JHEP Rep. 2023;5:100788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100788 . [DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100788]
  24. ESBL-producing Enterobacterales; Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs); Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). https://www.cdc.gov/hai/organisms/ESBL . Accessed 24 September 2024

MeSH Term

Humans
Liver Cirrhosis
Retrospective Studies
Male
India
Female
Tertiary Care Centers
Middle Aged
Drug Resistance, Bacterial
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Risk Factors
Adult
Bacterial Infections
Aged
Peritonitis
Microbial Sensitivity Tests

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientsinfectionscirrhosisbacterialinfectionresistanceamongstudyculturecirrhoticfactorsclinicaloutcomesdrug-resistantbacteriaThusconductedassesspatterns31tertiarycaresensitivityantibioticvariablesp-valueAmong1%commontract4%9%Escherichiacoligram-negativeMultidrug-resistantseenMDRXDR226%poorBacterialBACKGROUNDANDOBJECTIVE:epidemiologicalconnectionspredisposingpoorlydocumentedriskcomplicationsMETHODS:retrospectiveobservationalMarch12021July2023centreUttarPradeshPatientsaged ≥ 18 yearsmicrobialincludedSamplesindicatedsentmicrobiologylabpatient'shistorydetailsregardingresultsextractedhospitalinformationsystemHISenteredexcelsheetUnivariateanalysisdonestatisticalsignificancedeterminedusingof < 005consideredsignificantRESULTS:period765diagnosed24832%positivereport20683recovereddischargedstableconditionspontaneousperitonitis495%followedbacteremia39lowerrespiratory6urinary2skinsofttissue2%28%organism13454%extensivelysignificantlyassociatedCarbapenem-resistantorganismspredominantresistantisolatesmortalityrate16CONCLUSIONS:emergingthreatdetrimentaleffectprognosiscriticalstrategiespreventdevelopmentprofileassociationoutcomeattendingreferralcenternorthernIndiaCarbapenemCirrhosisDrugEnterobacterales

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.