Backside Irradiation of Ultraviolet-A for Correcting Nonuniformity Error of Gafchromic XR-QA2 Films.

Nobuyoshi Tanki, Sachiko Goto, Toshizo Katsuda, Rumi Gotanda, Tatsuhiro Gotanda, Tadao Kuwano
Author Information
  1. Nobuyoshi Tanki: Department of Radiological Technology, Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
  2. Sachiko Goto: Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
  3. Toshizo Katsuda: Department of Medical Radiation Technology, Shizuoka College of Medicalcare Science, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan.
  4. Rumi Gotanda: Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science and Technology, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Kurashiki, Japan.
  5. Tatsuhiro Gotanda: Department of Radiological Technology, Faculty of Health Science and Technology, Kawasaki University of Medical Welfare, Kurashiki, Japan.
  6. Tadao Kuwano: Department of Radiology, Osaka Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases Prevention, Osaka, Japan.

Abstract

Purpose: Radiochromic film is used for quality assurance and quality control of X-ray equipment in the diagnostic radiology. In addition, three-dimensional dose distribution of computed tomography (CT) is measured. To correct the nonuniformity and uncertainty of radiochromic films for dose measurement of CT, the films are preirradiated ultraviolet (UV)-A rays. There is a difference in the UV protection strength of radiochromic films. A concern exists about the effects of the UV-A irradiation intensity. We thus irradiated with UV-A rays from the backsides of the films to assess if backside irradiation was possible.
Materials and Methods: Gafchromic XR-QA2 and RTQA2 were used in this study. The UV-A rays were simultaneously irradiated on the front and backsides of each film for 12 h. The yellow layer of each film was scanned and imaged. The average pixel values �� standard deviations (SDs) were compared. In the statistical analysis, a paired t-test was performed. To compare, the active-layer densities engendered by the UV-A rays. Calibration curve was created with 48 h of preirradiation of UV-A.
Results: The mean pixel values �� SD for Gafchromic XR-QA2 on the front and backsides were 130.776 �� 0.812 and 81.015 �� 1.128, respectively. On the other hand, the mean pixel values �� SD for Gafchromic RTQA2 on the front and backsides were 62.299 �� 1.077 and 133.761 �� 1.365, respectively. The statistical results of the paired t-test were significantly different (P < 0.01) between both films. Fitting equation of the calibration curve is shown below. y = -390.47 �� 200 + (443.45 �� 10x80).5068 �� 0.0434.
Conclusion: Based on the relationship between the sensitivity of the active layer to UV-A rays and the strength of UV protection on the surface, we concluded that backside irradiation is recommended for Gafchromic XR-QA2, and frontside irradiation is recommended for Gafchromic RTQA2.

Keywords

References

  1. Med Phys. 2012 Feb;39(2):842-50 [PMID: 22320794]
  2. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Feb;24(2):e13897 [PMID: 36610053]
  3. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2011 Jun;34(2):213-22 [PMID: 21437731]
  4. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Sep 08;16(5):427���434 [PMID: 26699326]
  5. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2021 Jan 29;193(2):96-104 [PMID: 33786601]
  6. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2021 Aug 14;195(1):61-68 [PMID: 34341820]
  7. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med. 2013 Mar;36(1):59-63 [PMID: 23479183]
  8. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Nov 08;16(6):449���457 [PMID: 26699578]
  9. Med Phys. 1998 Nov;25(11):2093-115 [PMID: 9829234]
  10. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 May 08;17(3):41-51 [PMID: 27167258]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0��UV-AGafchromicfilmsraysirradiationfilmbacksidesXR-QA2radiochromicUVRTQA2frontpixelvalues01usedqualitydosecomputedtomographyCTultravioletprotectionstrengthirradiatedbacksidehlayerstatisticalpairedt-testcurvemeanSDrespectivelyrecommendedBacksidePurpose:RadiochromicassurancecontrolX-rayequipmentdiagnosticradiologyadditionthree-dimensionaldistributionmeasuredcorrectnonuniformityuncertaintymeasurementpreirradiated-AdifferenceconcernexistseffectsintensitythusassesspossibleMaterialsMethods:studysimultaneously12yellowscannedimagedaveragestandarddeviationsSDscomparedanalysisperformedcompareactive-layerdensitiesengenderedCalibrationcreated48preirradiationResults:13077681281015128hand62299077133761365resultssignificantlydifferentP<01Fittingequationcalibrationshowny=-39047200+4434510x8050680434Conclusion:BasedrelationshipsensitivityactivesurfaceconcludedfrontsideIrradiationUltraviolet-ACorrectingNonuniformityErrorFilmsreflectivetyperadiation

Similar Articles

Cited By