Evaluating the Predictive Value of the Dose-volume Parameters and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Expression on Rectal Toxicity in Prostate Cancer Patients.

Marziyeh Mirzaeiyan, Hossein Khanahmad, Simin Hemati, Mahnaz Etehadtavakol, Zahra Sharifonnasabi, Parvaneh Shokrani
Author Information
  1. Marziyeh Mirzaeiyan: Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.
  2. Hossein Khanahmad: Department of Genetics and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  3. Simin Hemati: Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  4. Mahnaz Etehadtavakol: Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
  5. Zahra Sharifonnasabi: Department of Statistics, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
  6. Parvaneh Shokrani: Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

Background: The response to radiation varies widely among people. Despite recent advances to conform the dose distribution to the tumor volume, it is still impossible to perform radiotherapy based on the biological characteristics of each individual. In this case, identifying a biomarker can be a step toward personalizing treatment. This research was carried out to evaluate the predictive value of dose-volume parameters and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression on rectal proctitis toxicity in prostate cancer patients.
Materials and Methods: Eighteen patients with prostate cancer who underwent helical tomotherapy were included in the study. VEGF serum level before and after treatment was obtained. Furthermore, dosimetric parameters, including rectal volume, maximum dose, V50, V60, V65, V70, and V75 were extracted. Spearman's correlation coefficient of VEGF-related and dosimetric parameters with the grade ���1 rectal proctitis was calculated.
Results: In the rectal toxicity group, the mean value of VEGF increased significantly after treatment compared to before ( = 0.008). Despite lower values of pre- and post-treatment VEGF in the toxicity group, this difference was not statistically significant ( > 0.05). Among the dosimetric parameters, only V65 had a significantly higher value in the toxicity group ( = 0.033). The highest correlation coefficients were obtained for pretreatment VEGF values and V65 (-0.446 and 0.450).
Conclusion: The results of the study confirm the correlation of VEGF expression with the pathobiology process of rectal radiation proctitis. However, the pathobiology process of radiation proctitis is complicated. More research is needed to prove the involvement of VEGF expression in the early detection of proctitis.

Keywords

References

  1. Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Jan;63(1):113-125 [PMID: 29080145]
  2. Hong Kong Med J. 2019 Dec;25(6):460-467 [PMID: 31796645]
  3. Acta Oncol. 2023 Jun;62(6):642-647 [PMID: 37345868]
  4. Radiother Oncol. 2012 Oct;105(1):79-85 [PMID: 22748390]
  5. PLoS One. 2016 May 12;11(5):e0154499 [PMID: 27171271]
  6. Med Dosim. 2011 Autumn;36(3):264-71 [PMID: 20634054]
  7. Radiother Oncol. 2014 Apr;111(1):100-5 [PMID: 24631144]
  8. Front Oncol. 2019 Apr 12;9:269 [PMID: 31032229]
  9. Radiother Oncol. 2012 Mar;102(3):347-51 [PMID: 22119373]
  10. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2017 Oct;27(4):358-369 [PMID: 28865519]
  11. J Med Radiat Sci. 2017 Sep;64(3):172-179 [PMID: 28145071]
  12. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2014 Mar;4(2):167-72 [PMID: 24761232]
  13. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:515048 [PMID: 23737650]
  14. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2023 Mar 27;8(5):101227 [PMID: 37216005]
  15. Radiat Oncol. 2021 Nov 14;16(1):220 [PMID: 34775975]
  16. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020 Jan-Feb;25(1):50-54 [PMID: 31889921]
  17. Acta Oncol. 2010 Oct;49(7):1040-4 [PMID: 20831493]
  18. Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Jun;7(3):297-307 [PMID: 30050791]
  19. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3):755-60 [PMID: 19464123]
  20. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3):747-54 [PMID: 19540054]
  21. Int J Radiat Biol. 2018 Jul;94(7):645-655 [PMID: 29855218]
  22. Int Braz J Urol. 2019 Nov-Dec;45(6):1105-1112 [PMID: 31808397]
  23. Colorectal Dis. 2018 Apr;20(4):321-330 [PMID: 28963746]
  24. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2015;16(3):1111-6 [PMID: 25735340]
  25. BMC Cancer. 2015 Nov 07;15:868 [PMID: 26547188]
  26. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2020 Jan-Feb;25(1):85-90 [PMID: 32042272]
  27. Phys Med. 2021 Sep;89:219-225 [PMID: 34425512]
  28. Front Oncol. 2023 Mar 21;13:1129918 [PMID: 37025592]
  29. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Mar 1;76(3 Suppl):S123-9 [PMID: 20171506]
  30. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022 Jan 1;112(1):247-259 [PMID: 34706278]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0VEGFproctitisrectalparameterstoxicity0radiationtreatmentvalueexpressiondosimetricV65correlationgroupDespitedosevolumeresearchvascularendothelialgrowthprostatecancerpatientsstudyobtainedsignificantly=valuespathobiologyprocessBackground:responsevarieswidelyamongpeoplerecentadvancesconformdistributiontumorstillimpossibleperformradiotherapybasedbiologicalcharacteristicsindividualcaseidentifyingbiomarkercansteptowardpersonalizingcarriedevaluatepredictivedose-volumefactorMaterialsMethods:EighteenunderwenthelicaltomotherapyincludedserumlevelFurthermoreincludingmaximumV50V60V70V75extractedSpearman'scoefficientVEGF-relatedgrade���1calculatedResults:meanincreasedcompared008lowerpre-post-treatmentdifferencestatisticallysignificant>05Amonghigher033highestcoefficientspretreatment-0446450Conclusion:resultsconfirmHowevercomplicatedneededproveinvolvementearlydetectionEvaluatingPredictiveValueDose-volumeParametersVascularEndothelialGrowthFactorExpressionRectalToxicityProstateCancerPatientsBiomarkersprostaticneoplasmsrectumfactors

Similar Articles

Cited By