Perspectives on early health economic evaluations of RNA therapies targeted at lipoprotein(a).

Angela Burvill, Gerald F Watts, Zanfina Ademi
Author Information
  1. Angela Burvill: Internal Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue.
  2. Gerald F Watts: School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Nedlands.
  3. Zanfina Ademi: Health Economics and Policy Evaluation Research (HEPER) Group, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences.

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Early health economic evaluations of new medications are useful, as they consider the implications for health services.We reviewed recent literature on expected clinical outcomes of lowering of elevated plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in secondary prevention, which is essential information on effectiveness for economic evaluations.We reviewed a recent early economic evaluation of RNA therapies targeted at Lp(a).
RECENT FINDINGS: RNA-based therapies, if approved, would likely be used initially in adults with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and very high Lp(a). Adults with ASCVD have high absolute risk of recurrent events and elevated Lp(a) serves as a risk-enhancing factor.Potent lowering of Lp(a) in secondary prevention may be associated with significant relative risk reductions of coronary heart disease or ASCVD events; this needs confirmation in currently ongoing and future clinical trials.One economic evaluation has estimated the value of olpasiran and pelacarsen, at various willingness-to-pay thresholds, compared with standard-of-care secondary prevention.
SUMMARY: Early economic evaluations estimate longer-term clinical benefits and cost consequences associated with new medications.Existing casual evidence of Lp(a) and cardiovascular disease can be used in early economic evaluations as best available evidence, while awaiting results from major cardiovascular outcomes trials.

References

  1. Kronenberg F, Mora S, Stroes E, et al. Lipoprotein(a) in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and aortic stenosis: a European Atherosclerosis Society consensus statement. Eur Heart J 2022; 43:3925���3946.
  2. Chan D, Watts GF. The promise of PCSK9 and lipoprotein(a) as targets for gene silencing therapies. Clin Ther 2023; 45:1034���1046.
  3. Nicholls S. Therapeutic potential of lipoprotein(a) inhibitors. Drugs 2024; 84:637���643.
  4. ClinicalTrials.gov. Assessing the impact of lipoprotein(a) lowering with pelacarsen (TQJ230) on major cardiovascular events in patients with CVD (Lp(a)HORIZON). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04023552 . [Accessed 18 December 2024].
  5. ClinicalTrials.gov. Olpasiran trials of cardiovascular events and lipoprotein(a) reduction (OCEAN(a)) - outcomes trial. https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05581303 . [Accessed 18 December 2024].
  6. ClinicalTrials.gov. A study to investigate the effect of lepodisiran on the reduction of major adverse cardiovascular events in adults with elevated lipoprotein(a) - ACCLAIM-Lp(a). https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06292013?intr=lepodisiran&rank=1 . [Accessed 18 December 2024].
  7. Tsimikas S. Lipoprotein(a) in the year 2024: a look back and a look ahead. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2024; 44:1485���1490.
  8. Ademi Z, Morton J, Liew D, et al. Integrating the biology of cardiovascular disease into the epidemiology of economic decision modelling via Mendelian randomisation. PharmacoEconomics 2022; 40:1033���1042.
  9. Pham B, Tu H, Han D, et al. Early economic evaluation of emerging health technologies: protocol of a systematic review. Syst Rev 2014; 3:1���7.
  10. Burvill A, Watts G, Norman R, Ademi Z. Early health technology assessment of gene silencing therapies for lowering lipoprotein(a) in the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. J Clin Lipidol. (in press).
  11. Marquina C, Lacaze P, Tiller J, et al. Population genomic screening of young adults for familial hypercholesterolaemia: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Eur Heart J 2022; 43:3243���3254.
  12. Desai N, Campbell C, Electricwala B, et al. Cost effectiveness of inclisiran in atherosclerotic cardiovascular patients with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol despite statin use: a threshold analysis. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2022; 22:545���556.
  13. Kam N, Perera K, Zomer E, et al. Inclisiran as adjunct lipid-lowering therapy for patients with cardiovascular disease: a cost-effectiveness analysis. PharmacoEconomics 2020; 38:1007���1020.
  14. Perera K, Kam N, Ademi Z, et al. Bempedoic acid for high-risk patients with CVD as adjunct lipid-lowering therapy: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Clin Lipidol 2020; 14:772���783.
  15. Ademi Z, Norman R, Pang J, et al. Cost-effectiveness and return on investment of a nationwide case-finding program for familial hypercholesterolemia in children in the Netherlands. JAMA Pediatr 2023; 177:625���632.
  16. Ademi Z, Norman R, Pang J, et al. Health economic evaluation of screening and treating children with familial hypercholesterolemia early in life: many happy returns on investment? Atherosclerosis 2020; 304:1���8.
  17. Morton J, Liew D, Watts G, et al. Immediate versus 5-year risk-guided initiation of treatment for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease for Australians aged 40 years: a health economic analysis. PharmacoEconomics (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007 .
  18. Kronenberg F, Mora S, Stroes E, et al. Frequent questions and responses on the 2022 lipoprotein(a) consensus statement of the European Atherosclerosis Society. Atherosclerosis 2023; 374:107���120.
  19. Koschinsky M, Bajaj A, Boffa M, et al. A focused update to the 2019 NLA scientific statement on use of lipoprotein(a) in clinical practice. J Clin Lipidol. (in press).
  20. Berman A, Biery D, Besser S, et al. Lipoprotein(a) and major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with or without baseline atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2024; 9:873���886.
  21. Patel A, Wang M, Pirruccello J, et al. Lp(a) (lipoprotein[a]) concentrations and incident atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2021; 41:465���474.
  22. Welsh P, Welsh C, Celis-Morales C, et al. Lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular disease: prediction, attributable risk fraction, and estimating benefits from novel interventions. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2021; 28:1991���2000.
  23. Burgess S, Ference B, Staley J, et al. Association of LPA variants with risk of coronary disease and the implications for lipoprotein(a)-lowering therapies: a mendelian randomization analysis. JAMA Cardiol 2018; 3:619���627.
  24. Lamina C, Kronenberg F. Estimation of the required lipoprotein(a)-lowering therapeutic effect size for reduction in coronary heart disease outcomes: a Mendelian randomization analysis. JAMA Cardiol 2019; 4:575���579.
  25. Nissen S, Qang Q, Nicholls S, et al. Zerlasiran���a small-interfering RNA targeting lipoprotein(a): a phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2024; [Epub ahead of print].
  26. Nicholls S, Rhodes W, Nissen G, et al. Oral muvalaplin for lowering of lipoprotein(a): a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2024; [Epub ahead of print].
  27. IJzerman M, Koffijberg H, Fenwick E, Krahn M. Emerging use of early health technology assessment in medical product development: a scoping review of the literature. PharmacoEconomics 2017; 35:727���740.
  28. Morton J, Liew D, Ademi Z. A causal model for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: the health economic model for the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (article in press). Value Health . 2024.
  29. Madsen C, Kamstrup P, Langsted A, et al. Lipoprotein(a)-lowering by 50���mg/dL (105���nmol/L) may be needed to reduce cardiovascular disease 20% in secondary prevention: a population-based study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2020; 40:255���266.
  30. Keyes M, Westreich D. UK Biobank, big data, and the consequences of nonrepresentativeness. Lancet 2019; 393:1297.
  31. Lamina C. Mendelian randomization: principles and its usage in Lp(a) research. Atherosclerosis 2022; 349:36���41.
  32. Morton J, Marquina C, Lloyd M, et al. Lipid-lowering strategies for primary prevention of coronary heart disease in the UK: a cost-effectiveness analysis. PharmacoEconomics 2024; 42:91���107.
  33. Lamina C, Ward N. Lipoprotein(a) and diabetes mellitus. Atherosclerosis 2022; 347:63���71.
  34. Hartz S, John J. Contribution of economic evaluation to decision making in early phases of product development: a methodological and empirical review. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2008; 24:465���472.
  35. Tsimikas S. ���Lipoprotein(a) reduction in persons with cardiovascular disease���. N Engl J Med 2020; 382:244���255.
  36. O���Donoghue M, Rosenson R, Gencer B, et al. Small interfering RNA to reduce lipoprotein(a) in cardiovascular disease. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:1855���1864.
  37. Nissen S, Linnebjerg H, Shen X, et al. Lepodisiran, an extended-duration short interfering RNA targeting lipoprotein(a) a randomized dose-ascending clinical trial. JAMA 2023; 330:2075���2083.
  38. Verve Therapeutics. Verve Therapeutics announces pipeline progress and anticipated 2025 milestones. Published 13 January 2025. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/01/13/3008312/0/en/Verve-Therapeutics-Announces-Pipeline-Progress-and-Anticipated-2025-Milestones.html . [Accessed 15 January 2025].
  39. Doerfler A, Park S, Assini J, et al. LPA disruption with AAV-CRISPR potently lowers plasma apo(a) in transgenic mouse model: a proof of concept study. 2022. MTMCD; 27: 337���351.

MeSH Term

Humans
Lipoprotein(a)
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Secondary Prevention
Atherosclerosis
Oligonucleotides
Cardiovascular Diseases
Dicarboxylic Acids
Fatty Acids
RNA, Small Interfering

Chemicals

Lipoprotein(a)
ALN-PCS
Oligonucleotides
8-hydroxy-2,2,14,14-tetramethylpentadecanedioic acid
Dicarboxylic Acids
Fatty Acids
RNA, Small Interfering

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0economicevaluationsLphealthclinicalsecondarypreventionearlytherapiescardiovasculardiseaseASCVDEarlynewmedicationsWereviewedrecentoutcomesloweringelevatedlipoproteinevaluationRNAtargetedusedhighriskeventsassociatedtrialsevidencePURPOSEOFREVIEW:usefulconsiderimplicationsservicesliteratureexpectedplasma[Lp]essentialinformationeffectivenessRECENTFINDINGS:RNA-basedapprovedlikelyinitiallyadultsestablishedatheroscleroticAdultsabsoluterecurrentservesrisk-enhancingfactorPotentmaysignificantrelativereductionscoronaryheartneedsconfirmationcurrentlyongoingfutureOneestimatedvalueolpasiranpelacarsenvariouswillingness-to-paythresholdscomparedstandard-of-careSUMMARY:estimatelonger-termbenefitscostconsequencesExistingcasualcanbestavailableawaitingresultsmajorPerspectives

Similar Articles

Cited By