Behavior, behavioral syndromes, and metabolism: the effects of artificial selection for death-feigning on metabolic rate.

Kentarou Matsumura, David J Hosken, Tomohito Noda, Takahisa Miyatake, Manmohan D Sharma
Author Information
  1. Kentarou Matsumura: Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan.
  2. David J Hosken: Centre for Ecology and Conservation, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK.
  3. Tomohito Noda: Centre for Ecology and Conservation, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK.
  4. Takahisa Miyatake: Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan. ORCID
  5. Manmohan D Sharma: Centre for Ecology and Conservation, Faculty of Environment, Science and Economy, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK.

Abstract

Death-feigning, or thanatosis, is an anti-predator behavioral strategy in many animals. Because individuals remain immobile while feigning Death, individuals with longer durations of Death feigning often show lower locomotor activity. Thus, metabolic rate, which is closely related to locomotor activity, may also be related to the intensity of Death feigning. If there is a genetic correlation between Death feigning and metabolism, metabolic rate may respond to selection on Death-feigning behavior. Here, we tested for a relationship between metabolic rate and Death-feigning using replicated populations of the red flour beetle (Tribolium castaneum) subjected to artificial bidirectional selection on the duration of Death-feigning behavior. The results indicated that metabolic rate did not differ between populations selected for increased or decreased Death feigning, although locomotor activity was significantly different between these treatments; populations selected for reduced Death-feigning durations tended to be more active. These results suggest that Death-feigning behavior is not genetically correlated with metabolic rate in T. castaneum.

Keywords

References

  1. NMR Biomed. 2010 Feb;23(2):123-32 [PMID: 19691132]
  2. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2007 May;82(2):291-318 [PMID: 17437562]
  3. Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jan 7;271(1534):65-73 [PMID: 15002773]
  4. J Exp Biol. 1999 Sep;202(Pt 18):2513-20 [PMID: 10460738]
  5. Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2011 Mar;158(3):265-75 [PMID: 21134483]
  6. Behav Genet. 1979 Nov;9(6):543-53 [PMID: 122270]
  7. Behav Genet. 1979 Nov;9(6):555-61 [PMID: 122271]
  8. Evolution. 2010 Dec;64(12):3354-63 [PMID: 20874734]
  9. Behav Genet. 1998 May;28(3):227-37 [PMID: 9670598]
  10. J Exp Biol. 2003 Dec;206(Pt 23):4309-15 [PMID: 14581600]
  11. Heredity (Edinb). 1987 Oct;59 ( Pt 2):181-97 [PMID: 3316130]
  12. Oecologia. 2014 Sep;176(1):57-68 [PMID: 25012598]
  13. Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Nov 7;271(1554):2293-6 [PMID: 15539355]
  14. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 7;270 Suppl 2:S220-2 [PMID: 14667388]
  15. J Evol Biol. 2011 Oct;24(10):2153-63 [PMID: 21696480]
  16. Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Apr;21(4):178-85 [PMID: 16701083]
  17. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010 Nov;25(11):653-9 [PMID: 20832898]
  18. Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 5;8(1):8599 [PMID: 29872133]
  19. Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Mar 29;284(1851): [PMID: 28330918]
  20. Sci Rep. 2019 Sep 30;9(1):14001 [PMID: 31570743]
  21. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Nov;97(5):1915-22 [PMID: 15234957]
  22. Oecologia. 1997 Jul;111(3):318-324 [PMID: 28308125]
  23. J Insect Physiol. 2004 May;50(5):445-53 [PMID: 15121458]
  24. J Ethol. 2016;34(2):97-105 [PMID: 27829699]
  25. Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Aug 7;276(1668):2763-7 [PMID: 19403540]
  26. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Dec 7;278(1724):3465-73 [PMID: 21957133]
  27. Physiol Genomics. 2001 Feb 07;5(1):45-52 [PMID: 11161005]
  28. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2018;72(2):22 [PMID: 29386702]
  29. Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jul 7;273(1594):1631-6 [PMID: 16769634]
  30. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Jan 7;270(1510):45-51 [PMID: 12590770]
  31. Respir Physiol. 1984 Jan;55(1):1-9 [PMID: 6709979]
  32. Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 22;274(1609):555-60 [PMID: 17476776]
  33. Behav Genet. 2017 Jul;47(4):459-467 [PMID: 28421346]
  34. J Exp Biol. 2004 Jun;207(Pt 13):2267-76 [PMID: 15159431]
  35. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Dec 27;365(1560):3937-46 [PMID: 21078646]

Grants

  1. 18H02510/Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

MeSH Term

Animals
Tribolium
Locomotion
Selection, Genetic
Behavior, Animal
Basal Metabolism
Energy Metabolism

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0metabolicratedeath-feigningfeigningdeathselectionbehaviorlocomotoractivitypopulationsartificialanti-predatorbehavioralindividualsdurationsrelatedmayTriboliumcastaneumresultsselectedDeath-feigningthanatosisstrategymanyanimalsremainimmobilelongeroftenshowlowerThuscloselyalsointensitygeneticcorrelationmetabolismrespondtestedrelationshipusingreplicatedredflourbeetlesubjectedbidirectionaldurationindicateddifferincreaseddecreasedalthoughsignificantlydifferenttreatmentsreducedtendedactivesuggestgeneticallycorrelatedTBehaviorsyndromesmetabolism:effectspersonality

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.