Evaluation of underreporting occupational accidents among workers who handle laboratory animals.

Flávia Soares Lessa, Isabella Brasil Succi, Gilberto Marcelo Sperandio da Silva
Author Information
  1. Flávia Soares Lessa: Núcleo de Saúde do Trabalhador/Coordenação de Saúde do Trabalhador Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. ORCID
  2. Isabella Brasil Succi: Núcleo de Saúde do Trabalhador/Coordenação de Saúde do Trabalhador Fundação Oswaldo Cruz (Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. ORCID
  3. Gilberto Marcelo Sperandio da Silva: Instituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. ORCID

Abstract

Introduction: Occupational accidents pose a substantial health risk and represent a critical public health concern. While reporting occupational accidents is legally mandated, occupational accidents are significantly underreported, leading to institutional challenges and obstacles in planning and implementing preventive policies.
Objectives: To evaluate how often workers who handle laboratory animals report their occupational accidents at the Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biomodelos/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz and to correlate this rate with their possible causes.
Methods: This is an observational cohort study including workers who handle laboratory animals at the Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biomodelos/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Data were collected from questionnaires that these workers filled in and then compared to the accident records reported to the Núcleo de Saúde do Trabalhador (Brazil Workers' Health Center) between 2014 and 2019. We used the Research Electronic Data Capture for data entry and Stata 14 for statistical analysis.
Results: Occupational accidents were underreported by 44.8% of the workers who handle laboratory animals at the Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biomodelos/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. The characteristics of those who mostly underreported were women (63.6%), of mixed-race (55.6%), 35-44 years old (53.3%), with a doctorate degree (80%), and permanently employed (50%). The most common types of occupational accident reported in the questionnaires were scratches (17.2%) and bites (13.8%), while the most common injuries recorded were cuts (26.7%) and trips/falls (17.8%). Reasons for non-notification were apparent minor severity (57.2%), unwillingness to report (14.3%), no specific protocol to treat (14.3%), excessive bureaucracy (7.1%), and high occurrence (7.1%).
Conclusions: The underreporting rate of occupational accidents is 44.8% at the Instituto de Ciência e Tecnologia em Biomodelos/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Workers' awareness of the importance and compulsory nature of reporting should be raised to reduce this rate.

Keywords

References

  1. BMC Public Health. 2023 Mar 24;23(1):558 [PMID: 36959647]
  2. Rev Saude Publica. 2005 Apr;39(2):254-60 [PMID: 15895146]
  3. Rev Bras Enferm. 2019 Jun 27;72(3):737-743 [PMID: 31269140]
  4. Cien Saude Colet. 2020 May;25(5):1819-1828 [PMID: 32402017]
  5. Lab Anim Sci. 1996 Jun;46(3):298-304 [PMID: 8799936]
  6. Am J Ind Med. 2016 Mar;59(3):236-44 [PMID: 26681112]
  7. Rev Saude Publica. 2017 Dec 11;51:123 [PMID: 29236880]
  8. Work. 2018;61(1):113-123 [PMID: 30223420]
  9. J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Dec;229(6):609-620 [PMID: 31541698]
  10. Med Lav. 2022 Jun 28;113(3):e2022028 [PMID: 35766643]
  11. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 14;19(20): [PMID: 36293794]
  12. Vet World. 2020 Nov;13(11):2555-2564 [PMID: 33363354]
  13. Work. 2022;73(4):1393-1403 [PMID: 36093658]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0accidentsoccupationalworkerslaboratoryanimalsdehandleInstitutoCiênciaeTecnologiaemBiomodelos/FundaçãoOswaldoCruz8%underreportedrate143%OccupationalhealthreportingreportDataquestionnairesaccidentreportedWorkers'446%common172%71%underreportingIntroduction:posesubstantialriskrepresentcriticalpublicconcernlegallymandatedsignificantlyleadinginstitutionalchallengesobstaclesplanningimplementingpreventivepoliciesObjectives:evaluateoftencorrelatepossiblecausesMethods:observationalcohortstudyincludingcollectedfilledcomparedrecordsNúcleoSaúdeTrabalhadorBrazilHealthCenter20142019usedResearchElectronicCapturedataentryStatastatisticalanalysisResults:characteristicsmostlywomen63mixed-race5535-44yearsold53doctoratedegree80%permanentlyemployed50%typesscratchesbites13injuriesrecordedcuts267%trips/fallsReasonsnon-notificationapparentminorseverity57unwillingnessspecificprotocoltreatexcessivebureaucracyhighoccurrenceConclusions:awarenessimportancecompulsorynatureraisedreduceEvaluationamonganimaltechniciansregistryunderregistration

Similar Articles

Cited By