Differences between barley and maize revealed in limitations of photosystems I and II under high temperature and low air humidity.

Eugene A Lysenko
Author Information
  1. Eugene A Lysenko: Institute of Plant Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, ul. Botanicheskaya 35, 127276, Moscow, Russia.

Abstract

Non-photochemical quenching and limitations of the photosystem I and photosystem II activities were studied in C3 -plant barley and C4 -plant maize. Plants were exposed to prolonged heat stress under high and low air humidity. Both species decreased non-photochemical quenching at 37-42��C, which increased at 46��C. A decrease of photosystem II activity at 46��C in lower air humidity was achieved through different mechanisms. In barley, photosystem II was downregulated by the increase of non-photochemical quenching. In maize, photosystem II was downregulated by the increase of acceptor-side limitation. Analysis of transients also revealed differences between species. One second after a light induction, limitations flashes at the acceptor sides of both photosystems. Elevating the temperature decreased these flashes; acceptor-side limitations of both photosystems decreased proportional to each other. In maize, the size of flashes slightly diminished at 37��C and decreased more at 42-46��C. In barley, the size of flashes greatly decreased at 37��C and gradually returned to the control level under higher temperatures. Around photosystem II, the flash was quenched by a burst of non-photochemical quenching. In barley, the transient peaks of acceptor-side limitation and non-photochemical quenching were very similar at any temperature. This was not observed in maize.

MeSH Term

Hordeum
Zea mays
Photosystem II Protein Complex
Photosystem I Protein Complex
Humidity
Hot Temperature
Chlorophyll
Light
Species Specificity
Temperature

Chemicals

Photosystem II Protein Complex
Photosystem I Protein Complex
Chlorophyll

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0photosystemIIquenchingbarleymaizedecreasedlimitationsnon-photochemicalflashesairhumidityacceptor-sidephotosystemstemperature-planthighlowspecies46��Cdownregulatedincreaselimitationrevealedsize37��CNon-photochemicalactivitiesstudiedC3C4Plantsexposedprolongedheatstress37-42��CincreaseddecreaseactivitylowerachieveddifferentmechanismsAnalysistransientsalsodifferencesOnesecondlightinductionacceptorsidesElevatingproportionalslightlydiminished42-46��CgreatlygraduallyreturnedcontrollevelhighertemperaturesAroundflashquenchedbursttransientpeakssimilarobservedDifferences

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.