Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae) feeding responses to double virus infections in melon.

Rocio Gal��n-Cubero, Alberto Fereres, Ar��nzazu Moreno
Author Information
  1. Rocio Gal��n-Cubero: Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias (ICA-CSIC), Madrid, Spain. ORCID
  2. Alberto Fereres: Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias (ICA-CSIC), Madrid, Spain. ORCID
  3. Ar��nzazu Moreno: Instituto de Ciencias Agrarias (ICA-CSIC), Madrid, Spain. ORCID

Abstract

Virus infections cause economic losses in crops worldwide and their management and control present major challenges. In the field, double infections of two or more viruses are the rule, not the exception. The presence of several viruses in a plant makes it difficult to interpret virus-insect vector-plant interactions. Mixed infections can alter plant symptoms compared with single infections and may also impact their vectors. We describe plant-mediated indirect effects of virus double-infection on feeding behavior of an aphid vector (Aphis gossypii Glover) and virus transmission in melon (Cucumis melo L.). The viruses we used were a circulative cucurbit aphid-borne yellows virus (CABYV, Solemoviridae:Polerovirus) and a non-circulative cucumber mosaic virus (CMV, Bromoviridae:Cucumovirus). When melon plants were CMV-infected, indirect plant-mediated effects on A. gossypii feeding were like those reported on other plant species; specifically, intracellular punctures (pd) were more frequent and longer than on mock-inoculated plants, which enhanced CMV transmission. Similarly, when plants were CABYV-infected, we observed a statistically non-significant trend for increases in extended salivation (E1) and ingestion (E2) activities in phloem compared with mock-inoculated plants, which also enhanced CABYV transmission. When aphids fed on CMV-CABYV double-infected plants feeding behavior activities related to the transmission of both viruses were enhanced even more than when feeding on single-infected plants. Nevertheless, the virus transmission rate was the same on single-infected or double-infected plants. Thus, our results suggest that double infections do not modify viral dispersion compared with single infections since the indirect effect of CMV and CABYV in single infections is already optimized to favor virus transmission.

Keywords

References

  1. Plants (Basel). 2021 Jun 11;10(6): [PMID: 34207973]
  2. Phytopathology. 2020 Jan;110(1):29-48 [PMID: 31544593]
  3. J Gen Virol. 2005 Feb;86(Pt 2):469-472 [PMID: 15659767]
  4. Phytopathology. 2020 Jan;110(1):85-93 [PMID: 31609680]
  5. J Econ Entomol. 2007 Jun;100(3):646-55 [PMID: 17598521]
  6. Pathogens. 2023 Sep 01;12(9): [PMID: 37764927]
  7. Mol Plant Pathol. 2014 May;15(4):417-26 [PMID: 24341556]
  8. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2007 Jun;39(6):431-7 [PMID: 17558448]
  9. Phytopathology. 2020 Jan;110(1):174-186 [PMID: 31502517]
  10. J Insect Sci. 2024 May 1;24(3): [PMID: 38942050]
  11. Viruses. 2016 Nov 09;8(11): [PMID: 27834855]
  12. J Econ Entomol. 2015 Feb;108(1):11-9 [PMID: 26470098]
  13. Plants (Basel). 2020 Dec 14;9(12): [PMID: 33327457]
  14. J Gen Virol. 2012 Mar;93(Pt 3):662-667 [PMID: 22090212]
  15. Mol Ecol. 2010 Mar;19 Suppl 1:81-8 [PMID: 20331772]
  16. J Virol. 2018 Oct 12;92(21): [PMID: 30135123]
  17. Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 27;12(1):20355 [PMID: 36437281]
  18. Virology. 2016 Feb;489:179-91 [PMID: 26765969]
  19. Virus Res. 2014 Jun 24;186:38-46 [PMID: 24373951]
  20. Plant J. 2014 Feb;77(4):653-63 [PMID: 24372679]
  21. Elife. 2013 Jan 22;2:e00183 [PMID: 23358702]
  22. Plant Dis. 2017 Aug;101(8):1455-1462 [PMID: 30678589]
  23. Plant Sci. 2016 Nov;252:176-192 [PMID: 27717453]
  24. Plant Dis. 2003 Aug;87(8):960-964 [PMID: 30812803]
  25. Phytopathology. 2015 Jul;105(7):956-65 [PMID: 25822185]
  26. Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Mar 7;269(1490):455-60 [PMID: 11886636]
  27. Integr Comp Biol. 2014 Jul;54(2):193-209 [PMID: 24748599]
  28. Insects. 2022 Aug 31;13(9): [PMID: 36135492]
  29. Front Plant Sci. 2021 May 31;12:672400 [PMID: 34135928]
  30. Plant Dis. 2003 Apr;87(4):329-335 [PMID: 30831824]
  31. Phytopathology. 2023 Feb;113(2):117-141 [PMID: 36095333]
  32. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 22;11(12):e0167769 [PMID: 28005969]
  33. Mol Ecol. 2012 Mar;21(5):1294-304 [PMID: 22269032]
  34. Math Biosci. 2003 Jun;183(2):135-60 [PMID: 12711408]
  35. J Gen Virol. 1977 Mar;34(3):475-83 [PMID: 323416]
  36. J Chem Ecol. 1994 Mar;20(3):691-707 [PMID: 24242121]
  37. Sci Rep. 2012;2:578 [PMID: 22896811]
  38. Virus Res. 2011 Aug;159(2):201-5 [PMID: 21549769]
  39. Virol J. 2011 Mar 08;8:104 [PMID: 21385390]
  40. Ecol Lett. 2013 Mar;16(3):390-8 [PMID: 23279824]
  41. Plant J. 2024 Mar;117(6):1786-1799 [PMID: 37902568]
  42. Virus Res. 2009 May;141(2):158-68 [PMID: 19152819]
  43. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Feb 23;107(8):3600-5 [PMID: 20133719]
  44. Front Plant Sci. 2020 Jan 31;10:1811 [PMID: 32082355]
  45. J Gen Virol. 1997 Oct;78 ( Pt 10):2701-5 [PMID: 9349493]
  46. Viruses. 2016 Aug 11;8(8): [PMID: 27529271]
  47. Phytopathology. 2008 Dec;98(12):1340-5 [PMID: 19000010]
  48. Mol Plant Pathol. 2012 Feb;13(2):204-16 [PMID: 21726401]

Grants

  1. PID2020-117074RB-I00/Spain's Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  2. PRE2021-098416/INTERVIRAPHID

MeSH Term

Animals
Aphids
Cucumovirus
Feeding Behavior
Plant Diseases
Cucumis melo
Insect Vectors
Luteoviridae

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0virusinfectionstransmissionplantsfeedingvirusesdoubleplantcomparedsingleindirectgossypiimelonCABYVCMVenhancedalsoplant-mediatedeffectsbehavioraphidAphiscirculativenon-circulativemock-inoculatedactivitiesdouble-infectedsingle-infectedViruscauseeconomiclossescropsworldwidemanagementcontrolpresentmajorchallengesfieldtworuleexceptionpresenceseveralmakesdifficultinterpretvirus-insectvector-plantinteractionsMixedcanaltersymptomsmayimpactvectorsdescribedouble-infectionvectorGloverCucumismeloLusedcucurbitaphid-borneyellowsSolemoviridae:PoleroviruscucumbermosaicBromoviridae:CucumovirusCMV-infectedlikereportedspeciesspecificallyintracellularpuncturespdfrequentlongerSimilarlyCABYV-infectedobservedstatisticallynon-significanttrendincreasesextendedsalivationE1ingestionE2phloemaphidsfedCMV-CABYVrelatedevenNeverthelessrateThusresultssuggestmodifyviraldispersionsinceeffectalreadyoptimizedfavorHemiptera:Aphididaeresponseselectricalpenetrationgraphs

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.