Effectiveness of Empagliflozin in Treating Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review.

Sara Abou Al-Saud
Author Information
  1. Sara Abou Al-Saud: Department of Cardiac Sciences, College of Medicine, King Saud University, P.O. Box 7805, Riyadh 11472, Saudi Arabia.

Abstract

Aim: The goal of this systematic review is to determine the effectiveness of Empagliflozin in managing patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) as compared with a placebo.
Methods: Web of Science, Cochrane, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched for articles from 2000 to 2023. Reference lists of articles were manually screened. Trials that recruited patients with HFpEF and reported the effects of Empagliflozin were included. Endnote X9 software was used for the study screening process.
Results: 1029 non-duplicate articles were identified from the literature and 9 were selected for inclusion in this review. The included papers were all randomized controlled trials (RCTs). According to the findings, Empagliflozin reduces the risk of cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization for heart failure, and urgent heart failure visit to the hospital, as compared to placebo treatment. Empagliflozin was also associated with improved quality of life and lower occurrence of severe adverse events. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the treated and placebo groups, regarding the occurrence of adverse events or ability to exercise. The effect of Empagliflozin was found to be better in Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists (MRA) non-users and non-diabetic HFpEF patients. The effectiveness of Empagliflozin was unaffected by age or gender.
Conclusion: Empagliflozin treatment for HFpEF patients appears to be both safe and efficient when compared to a placebo, according to data of moderate quality.

Keywords

References

  1. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):184-193 [PMID: 34779658]
  2. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Apr 1;63(12):1123-1133 [PMID: 24491689]
  3. JAMA. 2020 Aug 04;324(5):488-504 [PMID: 32749493]
  4. Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 11;42(6):700-710 [PMID: 33351892]
  5. N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 24;381(17):1609-1620 [PMID: 31475794]
  6. Eur J Heart Fail. 2011 Jan;13(1):18-28 [PMID: 20685685]
  7. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Oct 12;10:1273781 [PMID: 37900570]
  8. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Oct 3;10:ED000142 [PMID: 31643080]
  9. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Feb 07;10:1046194 [PMID: 36824458]
  10. Eur J Heart Fail. 2020 Jun;22(6):1009-1018 [PMID: 32150314]
  11. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2014 Oct 16;9:26152 [PMID: 25326092]
  12. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Dec;108(12):1394-1405 [PMID: 30980205]
  13. BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928 [PMID: 22008217]
  14. Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):e254-e743 [PMID: 33501848]
  15. Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Jul;13(7):e006720 [PMID: 32580655]
  16. Lancet. 2019 Jan 5;393(10166):31-39 [PMID: 30424892]
  17. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 10;370(15):1383-92 [PMID: 24716680]
  18. Lancet. 2010 Jun 26;375(9733):2196-8 [PMID: 20609956]
  19. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Mar 29;79(12):1129-1137 [PMID: 35331406]
  20. JACC Heart Fail. 2019 Jun;7(6):505-515 [PMID: 31146874]
  21. Cardiovasc Res. 2023 Jan 18;118(17):3272-3287 [PMID: 35150240]
  22. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2011 Nov;26(6):562-8 [PMID: 21993357]
  23. Circulation. 2022 Oct 4;146(14):1046-1055 [PMID: 36098051]
  24. Circulation. 2021 Oct 19;144(16):1284-1294 [PMID: 34459213]
  25. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Sep;109(9):1079-1098 [PMID: 32236720]
  26. N Engl J Med. 2021 Oct 14;385(16):1451-1461 [PMID: 34449189]
  27. Circulation. 2022 Aug 30;146(9):676-686 [PMID: 35762322]
  28. Eur J Heart Fail. 2022 Aug;24(8):1400-1405 [PMID: 35604680]
  29. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 04;9:875327 [PMID: 35600478]
  30. Lancet. 2020 Jul 11;396(10244):121-128 [PMID: 32446323]
  31. Circulation. 2019 May 28;139(22):2528-2536 [PMID: 30882238]
  32. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Aug 11;42:101103 [PMID: 36032269]
  33. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Jul 5;80(1):1-18 [PMID: 35772911]
  34. Diabetes Care. 2022 Sep 1;45(9):2118-2126 [PMID: 35817022]
  35. Indian Heart J. 2023 Mar-Apr;75(2):122-127 [PMID: 36914068]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0empagliflozinpatientsfailureHFpEFplaceboEmpagliflozinheartcomparedarticlesrevieweffectivenessincludedtreatmentqualityoccurrenceadverseeventsHeartAim:goalsystematicdeterminemanagingpreservedejectionfractionMethods:WebScienceCochranePubMedScopusdatabasessearched20002023ReferencelistsmanuallyscreenedTrialsrecruitedreportedeffectsEndnoteX9softwareusedstudyscreeningprocessResults:1029non-duplicateidentifiedliterature9selectedinclusionpapersrandomizedcontrolledtrialsRCTsAccordingfindingsreducesriskcardiovascularmortalityhospitalizationurgentvisithospitalalsoassociatedimprovedlifelowersevereAdditionallysignificantdifferencestreatedgroupsregardingabilityexerciseeffectfoundbetterMineralocorticoidReceptorAntagonistsMRAnon-usersnon-diabeticunaffectedagegenderConclusion:appearssafeefficientaccordingdatamoderateEffectivenessTreatingPatientsFailurePreservedEjectionFraction:SystematicReviewClinicaltrialDiastolicdysfunctionSGLT2inhibitorsTreatmentoutcomes

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.