Amanda Hu: Dr. Hu: Associate Professor, Attending Surgeon, Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Dr. Deane: Resident Physician, Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Ms. Gill: PhD candidate, Division of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Dr. Lynn: Associate Dean, Continuing Professional Development, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. ORCID
INTRODUCTION: The rapid legalization of cannabis has led to a knowledge gap among health care practitioners (HCPs). This study aimed to evaluate a novel online webinar for HCP education on the health effects of smoking cannabis. METHODS: An educational activity was developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts. The webinar was recorded for on-demand viewing. A 10-item knowledge test was created by the multidisciplinary panel with content validity and was administered pre- and posteducational activity. RESULTS: Six hundred seven HCPs participated. Pre- to posttest scores increased from 56.9% ± 23.9% to 63.5% ± 24.7% (P < .0001). The live group had a significantly higher improvement in scores (10.5% [7.1-13.8% 95% CI] (P < .0001)) than the on-demand group. In multivariable regression model, the following factors were associated with a greater improvement in scores: older age (P = .0074), physician occupation (P = .026), live mode of learning interacted with lower pretest score (P < .0001), and live mode of learning interacted with female gender (P = .001). Approximately three-quarters of participants rated the webinar as above average (44.8%) or outstanding (29.8%). DISCUSSION: This novel online educational activity increased knowledge and awareness of the health effects of smoking cannabis in the airway among HCPs and engaged learners virtually during the COVID-19 pandemic.
References
Government of Canada. Canadian cannabis survey 2021: summary. Updated December 23, 2021. Available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/drugs-medication/cannabis/research-data/canadian-cannabis-survey-2021-summary.html. Accessed September 10, 2022.
Compton WM, Han B, Jones CM, et al. Marijuana use and use disorders in adults in the USA, 2002–14: analysis of annual cross-sectional surveys. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:954–964.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine. The Health Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids: The Current State of Evidence and Recommendations for Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2017.
Gardiner KM, Singleton JA, Sheridan J, et al. Health professional beliefs, knowledge, and concerns surrounding medicinal cannabis–a systematic review. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0216556.
Kansagara D, Morasco BJ, Iacocca MO, et al. Clinician knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding cannabis: results from a National Veterans Health Administration Survey. Pain Med. 2020;21:3180–3186.
Worster B, Ashare RL, Hajjar E, et al. Clinician attitudes, training, and beliefs about cannabis: an interprofessional assessment. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2023;8:547–556.
Klein TA, Bindler R. Ask your provider about cannabis: increasing nurse practitioner knowledge and confidence. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2022;7:700–705.
Takakuwa KM, Mistretta A, Pazdernik VK, et al. Education, knowledge, and practice characteristics of cannabis physicians: a survey of the Society of Cannabis Clinicians. Cannabis Cannabinoid Res. 2021;6:58–65.
Phulka JS, Howlett JW, Hu A. Cannabis related side effects in otolaryngology: a scoping review. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2021;50:56.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada. TriCouncil Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, 2022.
Moore JrDE, Green JS, Gallis HA. Achieving desired results and improved outcomes: integrating planning and assessment throughout learning activities. JCEHP. 2009;29:1–5.
Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, et al. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care. 2001;39:II2-45.
Heart & Stroke Foundation. Ceiling effect; 2022. Available at: https://strokengine.ca/en/glossary/ceiling-effect/. Accessed July 10, 2022.
Korlat S, Kollmayer M, Holzer J, et al. Gender differences in digital learning during COVID-19: competence beliefs, intrinsic value, learning engagement, and perceived teacher support. Front Psychol. 2021;12:637776.
Lowe MM, Bennett N, Aparicio A; American College of Chest Physicians Health and Science Policy Committee. The role of audience characteristics and external factors in continuing medical education and physician change: effectiveness of continuing medical education: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Educational Guidelines. Chest. 2009;135:56S–61S.
