A scoping review of visual communication of written patient health information preferences including a M��ori perspective.

A Caisip, L Kremer, L Edmonds, A Young
Author Information
  1. A Caisip: School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, 18 Frederick Street, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
  2. L Kremer: School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, 18 Frederick Street, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.
  3. L Edmonds: Te T��tai Hauora o Hine, Center for Women's Health Research, Victoria University of Wellington, 44 Kelburn Parade, Wellington 6140, New Zealand.
  4. A Young: School of Pharmacy, University of Otago, 18 Frederick Street, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand.

Abstract

This scoping review examines the visual design elements of written patient information (WPI), specifically focusing on imagery, colour, layout and content presentation, and their impact on health information communication, understanding, behaviour and preferences among patients. Understanding patient preferences allows for patient-informed WPI design, which is important for M��ori (Indigenous peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand) living in a colonial society. Nine studies were analysed, primarily investigating the integration of visual illustrations within WPI. Participants generally favoured the inclusion of images alongside text, finding them instrumental in enhancing comprehension and making health information more approachable. The preference for simpler and less detailed visuals, such as cartoons, was highlighted, although there was variability depending on literacy levels and cultural backgrounds. The use of colour, layout features (e.g. font type and white space) and content framing (e.g. positive versus negative framing of risk information) were explored for their effects on information reception and behavioural outcomes. Currently, there is a paucity of literature on M��ori preferences and requires further research. Overall, this scoping review highlights the importance of designing WPIs with visual elements that cater to diverse literacy levels and cultural preferences to optimize communication effectiveness and patient engagement.

References

  1. BMJ Glob Health. 2022 Jun;7(6): [PMID: 35760437]
  2. J Asthma. 2012 Jun;49(5):542-51 [PMID: 22715910]
  3. Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):531-542 [PMID: 27669682]
  4. Psychol Health. 2018 Jul;33(7):941-954 [PMID: 29667448]
  5. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2024 Feb;20(2):75-85 [PMID: 38030546]
  6. J Health Commun. 2014;19 Suppl 2:77-88 [PMID: 25315585]
  7. Implement Sci. 2015 Nov 04;10:156 [PMID: 26537589]
  8. J Health Commun. 2012;17 Suppl 3:109-21 [PMID: 23030565]
  9. Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Dec 20;: [PMID: 38117299]
  10. Science. 2009 Feb 27;323(5918):1226-9 [PMID: 19197022]
  11. J Cancer Educ. 2011 Mar;26(1):12-21 [PMID: 21161465]
  12. Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Feb;98(2):226-33 [PMID: 25468391]
  13. Patient Educ Couns. 2021 May;104(5):998-1017 [PMID: 33339657]
  14. Front Pharmacol. 2021 Nov 10;12:740334 [PMID: 34858174]
  15. Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Oct;103(10):1935-1960 [PMID: 32466864]
  16. J Natl Med Assoc. 2021 Feb;113(1):88-94 [PMID: 32753112]
  17. N Z Med J. 2024 Jul 5;137(1598):33-43 [PMID: 38963929]
  18. Risk Anal. 2017 Mar;37(3):546-556 [PMID: 27089046]
  19. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2012 Mar;74(2):174-8 [PMID: 23326002]
  20. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 Nov;13(6):1186-1190 [PMID: 27818214]
  21. Inj Prev. 2014 Feb;20(1):16-20 [PMID: 23793910]
  22. Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473 [PMID: 30178033]
  23. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018 Jun;40(3):676-685 [PMID: 29675683]
  24. Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Mar;78(3):275-81 [PMID: 20189746]
  25. Patient Educ Couns. 2006 May;61(2):173-90 [PMID: 16122896]
  26. Cureus. 2022 Jul 27;14(7):e27336 [PMID: 36043002]
  27. Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Mar;103(3):556-562 [PMID: 31601448]
  28. J Prim Health Care. 2015 Mar 01;7(1):24-33 [PMID: 25770713]
  29. J Vis Commun Med. 2013 Jun;36(1-2):38-43 [PMID: 23641765]
  30. Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Dec;38(6):1372-1379 [PMID: 27655308]

Grants

  1. Honors Scholarship, 2024/Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago
  2. Honors Scholarship, 2024/Division of Health Sciences, University of Otago

MeSH Term

Humans
Communication
Health Literacy
Maori People
New Zealand
Patient Education as Topic
Patient Preference

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0informationpreferencesvisualpatientscopingreviewWPIhealthcommunicationM��oridesignelementswrittencolourlayoutcontentliteracylevelsculturalegframingexaminesspecificallyfocusingimagerypresentationimpactunderstandingbehaviouramongpatientsUnderstandingallowspatient-informedimportantIndigenouspeoplesAotearoaNewZealandlivingcolonialsocietyNinestudiesanalysedprimarilyinvestigatingintegrationillustrationswithinParticipantsgenerallyfavouredinclusionimagesalongsidetextfindinginstrumentalenhancingcomprehensionmakingapproachablepreferencesimplerlessdetailedvisualscartoonshighlightedalthoughvariabilitydependingbackgroundsusefeaturesfonttypewhitespacepositiveversusnegativeriskexploredeffectsreceptionbehaviouraloutcomesCurrentlypaucityliteraturerequiresresearchOverallhighlightsimportancedesigningWPIscaterdiverseoptimizeeffectivenessengagementincludingperspective

Similar Articles

Cited By

No available data.